Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 41 days, net -14,727. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 13:17
3
-17,485
15 Sept 2026, 13:19
17,488
+674
13 Sept 2026, 18:58
16,814
+106
12 Sept 2026, 00:36
16,708
+133
9 Sept 2026, 12:40
16,575
+637
6 Sept 2026, 08:39
15,938
+512
4 Sept 2026, 03:00
15,426
+93
2 Sept 2026, 20:15
15,333
+178
1 Sept 2026, 19:34
15,155
+11
31 Aug 2026, 22:16
15,144
+95
30 Aug 2026, 20:17
15,049
+75
29 Aug 2026, 21:14
14,974
-15
28 Aug 2026, 22:48
14,989
+34
27 Aug 2026, 21:43
14,955
+27
26 Aug 2026, 20:02
14,928
+12
25 Aug 2026, 21:13
14,916
+38
24 Aug 2026, 18:53
14,878
-39
23 Aug 2026, 03:41
14,917
+22
21 Aug 2026, 13:07
14,895
+8
20 Aug 2026, 15:34
14,887
first reading
Engagement
133 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31707.5%
avg views ÷ 3 subscribers
Avg views / post
951
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.445%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
67
of 133 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 65 of 67 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
133 (3 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
63,732
Reactions total
276
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
19m 25s
Average length
3m 14s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
507 reactions across 126 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
175
34.5%
🔥
87
17.2%
👌
56
11.0%
😍
36
7.10%
💔
29
5.72%
🤩
27
5.33%
😁
25
4.93%
👍
21
4.14%
🗿
20
3.94%
🤯
11
2.17%
❤🔥
6
1.18%
😢
6
1.18%
💯
3
0.592%
🦄
3
0.592%
🏆
1
0.197%
💊
1
0.197%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 126 of the 133 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 507 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💰⛏️ اثبات برداشت ۴۳۰ هزار تومنی از سایت ماینری تتری! 🔥
بالاخره برداشت رو انجام دادم و نتیجه رو داخل ویدیو گذاشتم! 😍💵
توی این ویدیو اثبات برداشت ۴۳۰ هزار تومان از یک سایت ماینری تتری رو نشون میدم و مراحل برداشت رو قدمبهقدم بررسی میکنم.
📱 اگه میخوای ببینی این سایت چطور کار میکنه، چطور درآمد جمع میشه و روند برداشت چطوریه، حتماً ویدیو رو کامل ببین! 👀
🎥 ویدیو + اثبات برداشت:
👇
🔗 [https://youtu.be/t0b-TkDOUbM?si…
🎣🪙 ایردراپ جدید ماهیگیری؛ فقط ۲ روز تا شروع! 🔥
یک ایردراپ جدید با موضوع ماهیگیری پیدا کردم که فقط ۲ روز تا شروعش باقی مونده! 👀🎣
⭐️ نکته مهم این پروژه اینه که وایتلیست (Whitelist) خودش رو هم مشخص کرده و به نظر میرسه قبل از شروع، فرصت مناسبی برای بررسی و آماده شدن داشته باشیم.
📱 توی این ویدیو پروژه رو کامل معرفی کردم و درباره نحوه شرکت، شرایط وایتلیست و کارهایی که باید قبل از شروع انجام بدید توضیح دادم.
⏰ ۲ روز …
📢 این ویدیو تبلیغاتیه
🔥💰 یک پروژه ماینری جدید برای کسب درآمد دلاری! ⛏️📱
اگه دنبال یه پروژه جدید برای کسب درآمد دلاری با گوشی هستی، این ویدیو رو حتماً ببین! 👀
من خودم این پروژه رو بررسی کردم و برداشت درآمد رو هم انجام دادم و اثباتش رو داخل ویدیو گذاشتم 💵✅
📱 نکته جالب اینه که میتونی با چند فعالیت ساده، شروع به کسب درآمد کنی و روند کار و برداشت رو از نزدیک ببینی.
🚨 اگه میخوای قبل از اینکه دیر بشه با این پروژه آشنا…
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
⛏️💰 کسب درآمد ماینری از یک پروژه جدید و نقد مثل ATF! 🔥
یه پروژه جدید ماینری پیدا کردم که میتونه برای علاقهمندان به پروژههای استخراجی جذاب باشه! 🚀
توی این ویدیو نحوه شروع کار، ماین کردن، جمعآوری توکن و روند نقد کردن درآمد رو بررسی کردم و نشون دادم این پروژه چطور کار میکنه. 💵📱
👀 اگه دنبال پروژههای جدید ماینری هستی و میخوای بدونی این پروژه چه امکاناتی داره و چطور میشه درآمدش رو نقد کرد، حتماً ویدیو رو ببین!
…
🐦🎮 کسب درآمد از بازی پرندگان با اثبات برداشت ۵۰۰ هزار تومنی! 💰🔥
این بار یک بازی متفاوت رو بررسی کردم که با بازی کردن و انجام فعالیتهای داخل بازی میتونید درآمد کسب کنید! 📱💵
💸 مهمتر از همه، در این ویدیو اثبات برداشت ۵۰۰ هزار تومنی رو هم بهتون نشون دادم تا ببینید روند برداشت چطور انجام میشه.
👀 میخوای بدونی این بازی چطور کار میکنه و چطور میتونی درآمدت رو برداشت کنی؟
🎥 آموزش کامل + اثبات برداشت:
👇
🔗 [https://yo…
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤑🖐🏻 کسب درآمد و برداشت امروز از سایت ارز دیجیتال [ لینک ثبت نام]
🗿1🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 133 posts we hold for @mgdpie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mgdpie edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
خنده بازار 💯 @khandbazar20 · 92,401 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 12 August 2026
اوکی دیجیتال @okdigital · 30,039 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 7 September 2026
دانیال اکبری | تحلیلگر بازار مالی @danialtimes · 61,202 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MGDPIE DEAD” (@mgdpie), 3 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mgdpie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.