Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Milan Jain Official

Channel

Milan Jain Official

@milanjainofficial

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

146,381subscribers

+2,329 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001211898673
TypeChannel
Username@milanjainofficial
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/milanjainofficial

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

144,052158,258151,1556 August 2026 — 144,052 subscribers7 August 2026 — 144,249 subscribers8 August 2026 — 144,330 subscribers9 August 2026 — 144,405 subscribers10 August 2026 — 144,447 subscribers11 August 2026 — 144,433 subscribers12 August 2026 — 144,437 subscribers14 August 2026 — 144,718 subscribers16 August 2026 — 145,003 subscribers17 August 2026 — 145,292 subscribers18 August 2026 — 151,180 subscribers19 August 2026 — 151,202 subscribers20 August 2026 — 151,805 subscribers21 August 2026 — 151,960 subscribers22 August 2026 — 152,176 subscribers24 August 2026 — 152,594 subscribers25 August 2026 — 152,266 subscribers26 August 2026 — 152,229 subscribers27 August 2026 — 156,114 subscribers28 August 2026 — 151,107 subscribers29 August 2026 — 150,042 subscribers30 August 2026 — 148,976 subscribers31 August 2026 — 152,089 subscribers1 September 2026 — 154,349 subscribers2 September 2026 — 153,562 subscribers3 September 2026 — 152,407 subscribers5 September 2026 — 150,161 subscribers8 September 2026 — 147,365 subscribers11 September 2026 — 158,258 subscribers13 September 2026 — 157,233 subscribers15 September 2026 — 156,734 subscribers17 September 2026 — 156,270 subscribers25 September 2026 — 146,381 subscribers146,3816 August 202625 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 49 days, net +2,329. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 141,921–160,389 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 00:17146,381-9,889
17 Sept 2026, 05:19156,270-464
15 Sept 2026, 05:21156,734-499
13 Sept 2026, 13:00157,233-1,025
11 Sept 2026, 14:38158,258+10,893
8 Sept 2026, 20:59147,365-2,796
5 Sept 2026, 11:01150,161-2,246
3 Sept 2026, 16:17152,407-1,155
2 Sept 2026, 07:13153,562-787
1 Sept 2026, 04:34154,349+2,260
31 Aug 2026, 03:42152,089+3,113
30 Aug 2026, 04:35148,976-1,066
29 Aug 2026, 02:15150,042-1,065
28 Aug 2026, 02:29151,107-5,007
27 Aug 2026, 05:35156,114+3,885
26 Aug 2026, 03:33152,229-37
25 Aug 2026, 05:48152,266-328
24 Aug 2026, 06:46152,594+418
22 Aug 2026, 17:39152,176+216
21 Aug 2026, 04:44151,960first reading

Engagement

1,795 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 103 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.93%
avg views ÷ 146,381 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,290
1,036 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1,042
of 1,795 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1,032 of 1,036 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held1,795 (6 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total4,447,945
Reactions total166,437
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 21:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
31m 36s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 119 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

161,512 reactions across 988 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤27,04016.7%
👍22,96714.2%
🔥22,45613.9%
🤩22,24913.8%
🎉22,16613.7%
🥰11,9287.39%
❤‍🔥10,8386.71%
😍10,7136.63%
💯10,5016.50%
🏆3370.209%
👏1840.114%
👌360.022%
⚡320.02%
😎240.015%
🤝160.01%
🎄140.009%
😘60.004%
🤗50.003%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 990 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161,512 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
138
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 994 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
Most on one post
86
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @milanjainofficial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 20:14 UTC≈3,090 views3 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Dm Here To Possible Solutions ➡️➡️➡️➡️ https://www.instagram.com/milanjaintrader?stkn=bTBibmRvb2dzNnZj

❤1👏1🥰1

24 Sept 2026, 20:12 UTC≈3,080 views14 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❤9🎄2👏2👍1

24 Sept 2026, 20:12 UTC≈3,080 views6 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Chalo sab hata de ya aap ka

❤3👍1🥰1😍1

24 Sept 2026, 08:15 UTC≈3,890 views142 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Milan jain mobile no. - +971 58 925 3911

❤47🔥32🤩24🎉22👍16🥰1

24 Sept 2026, 08:15 UTC≈5,230 views81 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤30👍17🔥13🎉11🤩10

24 Sept 2026, 08:13 UTC≈5,180 views85 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤35🤩20🔥13👍11🎉5🥰1

24 Sept 2026, 08:11 UTC≈3,850 views74 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤32👍13🎉11🤩10🔥8

24 Sept 2026, 07:47 UTC≈4,180 views226 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😍41❤33👍29🔥26🎉24🥰22💯19🤩19

24 Sept 2026, 07:47 UTC≈3,990 views116 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤27💯16👍15🔥13❤‍🔥11🥰11🤩9🎉8

24 Sept 2026, 07:47 UTC≈3,980 views115 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤22🥰18❤‍🔥16😍15👍13🤩10🎉9💯6

24 Sept 2026, 07:46 UTC≈3,950 views120 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤27💯16❤‍🔥15😍13🎉12🤩12🔥10🥰10

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,795 posts we hold for @milanjainofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTCAnonymous Poll82 voters

Are you satisfied with my chart analysis!?

  1. Noo bro,35%
  2. You explained the trade very well✅✅78%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTCAnonymous Poll118 voters

What is your Today's status.

  1. Yes - I want to register➡️31%
  2. Deposit kr rahe hai aaj🤑💸17%
  3. I'm Interested, but not 😏registered yet.52%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 20:22 UTCAnonymous Poll62 voters

Are you happy with the giveaway?

  1. Yes Thankss✅✅37%
  2. Waitinggg🥲69%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTCAnonymous Poll80 voters

who all are watching live giveaway on youtube?

  1. Yes we are watching83%
  2. No Im not watching24%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Trader Milan Jain Official
@tradermilanjainofficial · 16,078
#1
TRADING LEGEND QTX
@realdeepwinner · 131,615
#2
QUOTEX BUG SURESHOT
@quotexprofit_hub · 51,004
#3
Modern Trading 🧿
@ModernTradingReal · 126,773
#4
Quotex Guru🎯
@binarygurujii · 35,441
#5
Aashi Professional Trader
@Ashipower123 · 18,283
#6
A2 Trader
@A2_Trader1 · 77,235
#7
SK SURE SHOTS EXPERT
@sksureshoot · 10,427
#8
Quotex Trading
@quoteX · 1,422,434
#9
Quotex OTC HACK Trading 🧿
@QuotexOTCHACK · 34,607
#10
TECHNICAL HARSH🤑
@sureshotskingharsh · 10,472
#11
Quotex Trader Lucky 🔱
@quotextraderlucky19 · 11,860
#12
Laxmi Trader Official
@Laxmi_trader_official · 10,259
#13
𝐅𝐔𝐋𝐋 𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐄 𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐑😈
@ftt21 · 39,373 (as read 13 August 2026)
#14
Quotex compounding signal 💸💸💸
@viccmac · 6,502
#15
Udaan Official
@Udaantradrr · 13,474
#16
PROFITABLE TRADER binary signals quotex binomo IQ option pocket option olymp trade
@PROFITABLETRADEREVER · 13,516
#17
TRADING WARRIORS
@warrior12g · 12,324
#18
DAISY TRADER
@daisytraderofficial · 3,634
#19
Ly Trader
@ly_trader_yt · 13,687
#20
TRADING LEGEND F&O
@legend_of_trading · 160,815
#21
Rani Quotex
@Rani_Quotex · 27,995
#22
VISION TRADING | FX
@VisionTradingYT · 8,242
#23
𝐃𝐌𝐅 𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐒
@M1Rtrading · 26,793
#24
Trading Stations
@trading_stations · 7,618
#25
𝐄𝐀𝐆𝐋𝐄 𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐆
@eagletradingg08 · 16,333
#26
Trader J
@jomeir · 13,372
#27
NON MTG BOT (QUOTEX)
@nonmtgbotsignals · 25,116
#28
QUOTEX NON MTG BOT
@quotexnomtgbot · 19,492
#29
Forex
@quotexbugsureshott · 9
#30
A2 Trader Binolla
@a2traderbinollaofficial · 61,761
#31
𝐇𝐄𝐋𝐋𝐎 𝐐𝐔𝐎𝐓𝐄𝐗
@Hello_Quotex · 12,747
#32
MADMAX📈TRADING💸
@madmaxorwot · 3,195
#33
Logical Trading
@LogicalTradingofficial · 4,830
#34
📊LOSS RECOVER LEGENT📊
@bugcompundgrup · 12,325
#35
TANMAY TRADING
@tanmayoption · 10,141
#36
Nicks Trader
@nickstrader · 22,969
#37
KING🤴 ɴᴏ1🔥ᴄᴏᴍᴩᴀɴy🔥ᴏꜰ📱TRADING🏆
@lovetrade43 · 3,030
#38
ELITE TRADING BANGLADESH ♤
@Legendary_Trading_Bangladesh · 10,937
#39
Quotex Professor Trading
@professortradings · 40,525
#40
Trade with Raj
@Tradewithrajjjj · 6,669
#41
Yuvraj Tech
@yuvrajtek · 4,718
#42
TR Trader 🔵
@trtrader2020 · 3,159
#43
⚔️ MAFIA TRADER ⚔️
@mafia1trader · 4,107
#44
TRADING TRUST
@TradingTrustOfficial · 2,963
#45
Tradearn academy❤️
@tradearnoriginal · 16,731
#46
COCO Trading
@CocoTrading · 4,167
#47
Indian B Trader
@indianbinarytraders · 3,176
#48
QUOTEX BUG SIGNALS🤯🚀🗽
@quotexLiveSignalsOTC · 41,801
#49
𝗤𝗨𝗢𝗧𝗘𝗫 𝗕𝗨𝗚 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟
@QuotexBugSignal0 · 11,568
#50
𝐇𝐄𝐋𝐏𝐈𝐍𝐆𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐑®™
@helpingtraderofficial · 7,394
#51
Rock Trade
@RockTrade01 · 3,650
#52
Rakshit Trader
@Rakshit_trader · 30,660
#53
Quotex Compounding Signal 🤯
@quotexcompounding0 · 2,802
#54
NON MTG LIVE SIGNAL'S (QUOTEX)
@nonmtglive · 12,407
#55
TRADER || YASHIKA💖
@TraderYashika00 · 1,885
#56
👑BINARY KING👑
@binarykingquotex01 · 4,530
#57
KING OF QUOTEX
@kingtrader4342 · 3,940 (as read 13 August 2026)
#58
𝐍𝐀𝐕𝐘𝐀 𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐆
@NavyaTrading0 · 2,748
#59
Trade With Harry 💸📈
@tradewithharryyyy · 2,526
#60
𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗧𝗮𝗵𝘀𝗶𝗻
@QUOTEXNONMTGBOTS · 19,112 (as read 13 August 2026)
#61
QUOTEX VIP SIGNAL
@QUOTEXVIPSIGNAL0082 · 6,407
#62
Thrust Trader
@thrusttrader · 3,045
#63
༗ 𝐕𝐀𝐈𝐒𝐇𝐔 𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐆 | 𝐕𝐀𝐈𝐒𝐇𝐔
@powerprincetraderr · 2,490
#64
Quotex Official Channel
@quotex_official · 373,951
#65
Quotex Pro Signals
@Quotex_Signalsx · 14,639 (as read 13 August 2026)
#66
🚀 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗦𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝗹 🔮
@QuantumSignalNet · 12,577
#67
QUOTEX Live SIGNALS 🤖📊
@QuotexSignalsBot_M1 · 59,890
#68
Quotex_SuperBot
@Quotex_SuperBot · 43,080
#69

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

A2 Trader Binolla
@a2traderbinollaofficial · 61,761
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 11 September 2026
A2 Trader
@A2_Trader1 · 77,235
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
Nicks Trader
@nickstrader · 22,969
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026
Scott Reyes | Trade your future📈
@scotttrad · 207,815
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
Amit Trader | Trading Tips
@Amit_Trader_Trading_Tips · 214,388
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
Quotex Guru🎯
@binarygurujii · 35,441
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 3 September 2026
Technical Mind Trade
@tecnicalmindtrade · 29,613
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 7 September 2026
TRADING LEGEND QTX
@realdeepwinner · 131,615
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 August 2026
QUOTEX BUG SURESHOT
@quotexprofit_hub · 51,004
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 25 August 2026
TRADING LEGEND F&O
@legend_of_trading · 160,815
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 12 August 2026
Rani Quotex
@Rani_Quotex · 27,995
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 9 September 2026
Modern Trading 🧿
@ModernTradingReal · 126,773
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 13 August 2026
𝐃𝐌𝐅 𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐒
@M1Rtrading · 26,793
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 8 September 2026
Quotex Professor Trading
@professortradings · 40,525
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 24 August 2026
Earn with Rashid
@EarnwithRashidChannel · 184,753
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 August 2026
Olymp Trade Binary Free Signals
@Olymp_Trade_Signals_Free_Binary · 41,247
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 September 2026
Quotex Trading
@quoteX · 1,422,434
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
Trading Quotex Signals
@Trading_Forex_Signals_Quotex · 40,147
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 30 August 2026
Amit Trader | Trading Signals
@Amit_Trading_Signals · 56,567
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 23 August 2026
Quotex Official Channel
@quotex_official · 373,951
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 August 2026
Rakshit Trader
@Rakshit_trader · 30,660
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 5 September 2026
Ale Trader - Signals FREE 📊💰
@aletrading · 128,100
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
Quotex Thomas Trading Signals🧿💸
@quotexbug07 · 117,936
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 24 August 2026
BatMan Trader
@BatmanTraders · 202,350
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 44 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Milan Jain Official” (@milanjainofficial), 146,381 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/milanjainofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.