Channel
@quotex_official
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
373,951subscribers
+12,281 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001259661344 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @quotex_official |
| Description | Welcome to Quotex — an innovative platform for smart investments 👉 https://qxbroker.com/en/ Android App https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=io.quotex.x PWA https://qxbroker.com/en/pwa |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/quotex_official |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 373,951 | -76 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:56 | 374,027 | -4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 374,031 | +191 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 373,840 | +429 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:20 | 373,411 | +573 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:15 | 372,838 | +955 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 371,883 | +640 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 371,243 | +434 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 370,809 | +154 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:48 | 370,655 | +196 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 370,459 | +457 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 370,002 | +251 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 369,751 | +402 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 369,349 | +204 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 369,145 | +270 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 368,875 | +390 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 368,485 | +69 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 368,416 | +913 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 367,503 | +558 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 366,945 | first reading |
57 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 57 (10 July 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,559,560 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 19:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
📘 Blog Selection: What Is Hedging? Remember: hedging between two or more accounts is not allowed on Quotex. Hedging can only be used within a single account and must follow the platform’s rules. But how does hedging actually work, what types are there, and when can it help with risk management? We’ve covered the key points, pros and cons, and practical examples in our article. 📖 Read the full guide to hedging
🆘 Having an issue? Our team is here to help! Follow the link below to find answers to the most frequently asked questions. If you can’t find what you’re looking for, create a support ticket and our team will assist you online! 👉 Help starts here.
🎯 How to Set Up a Pending Trade With Quotex, you can prepare your setup in advance and automate execution based on selected conditions. Pending trades are executed only when the specified price or time conditions are met - otherwise, the order will remain inactive. 📌 To create a pending trade: ✅ Select an asset ✅ Set the desired price or execution time ✅ Choose the amount and duration Once the conditions are met, …
🔎 Can you find all the Promo Codes hidden in our Blog? We’re launching a new giveaway! 🎁 We’ve hidden 5 different promo codes in articles published on our blog. Your challenge is simple: find them all and claim your rewards! 👀 Each promo code has a limited number of activations, so don’t wait too long. Someone else might find them first. 👉 Start your search
Step Into the $1,000 Challenge ⚡️ Join our weekly Free Friday tournament with free entry and compete for your share of the prize pool. How to participate: ✍️ Register for the tournament and maintain at least $100 in your account balance. 📈 Trade and achieve the best results. 🏆 The top 5 traders will share the $1,000 prize pool. Registration is now open in the Tournaments section.
📱 Quick access to Quotex on your iPhone Learn how to install the Quotex PWA app and access the platform directly from your home screen. 👉 Check out our step-by-step guide
Crazy Wednesday is almost here ✨ Join the tournament tomorrow and get a guaranteed gift 🎁 just for participating. 💵 Entry: $10 💰 Balance: $100 🏆 Prize pool: $7,500 (Top 5) 👉 Register now in the Tournaments section.
Week Start Boost — 90% Bonus on Your Deposit 👉 Deposit $60 or more using promo code QXWEEKB90ST and get a 90% bonus on your deposit. 🕛 Hurry! The number of promo code activations is limited.
The market always offers another opportunity. ⭐️ Trader of the Week — Renan C. from Brazil A standout performance. Congratulations! 👏
🎉 Your Knowledge Deserves a Reward! Thank you to everyone who took part in our poll! We didn't reach 20k answers, but we’re really happy to see that you’re reading our articles and putting your knowledge into practice. To show our appreciation, we’ve prepared a 10% Cashback promo code for you. It’s available to the fastest traders. Good luck! 👇 upoDpVmiCy
Posted without readable text
📊 How well do you know your Markets? We recently shared a blog article explaining how to choose the right asset to trade and what makes Forex, crypto, and commodities different from one another. Now let’s see how well you remember the key points 👀 If we reach 20K answers, we’ve already got a surprise prepared for you 🎁
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @quotex_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Quotex Official Channel” (@quotex_official), 373,951 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quotex_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.