سوالی اگر داشتید به تلگرام پشتیبانیمون پیام بدید ثبتنام هم از همین ایدی پایین انجام میشه👇🎀✨ @mimshgraph

Channel
محدثه شجاع پور | ادمینی و آموزش اینستاگرام
@mimshgraphy_admin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
36,034subscribers
-1,965 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002004865517 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mimshgraphy_admin |
| Description | رزرو ادمینی، آموزش و مشاوره 👈@MIMSHGRAPH | از طریق لینک زیر پیامت ناشناس میاد برام | https://telegram.me/BChatsBot?start=sc-Is5WKCH0RD |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 38 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mimshgraphy_admin |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 36,034 | -36 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:50 | 36,070 | -60 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 01:01 | 36,130 | -34 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:11 | 36,164 | -6 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 01:19 | 36,170 | -9 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 22:37 | 36,179 | -23 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 01:08 | 36,202 | -19 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 23:18 | 36,221 | -35 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 17:20 | 36,256 | -51 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 00:19 | 36,307 | -211 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 36,518 | -186 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 36,704 | -411 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 37,115 | -71 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 37,186 | -51 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 37,237 | -35 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 37,272 | -29 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 37,301 | +301 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 37,000 | -85 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 37,085 | -35 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 37,120 | first reading |
Engagement
112 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 129 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.77%
- avg views ÷ 36,034 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,720
- 46 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.533%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 46
- of 112 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 46 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 112 (5 July 2026 – 22 October 2026) |
| Views total | 78,995 |
| Reactions total | 373 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Oct 2026, 23:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈132
- Videos
- ≈32
- Links
- ≈92
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 10m 38s
- Average length
- 1m 31s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,063 reactions across 92 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 546 | 51.4% | |
| 💔 | 128 | 12.0% | |
| 👍 | 91 | 8.56% | |
| 😍 | 64 | 6.02% | |
| 😁 | 56 | 5.27% | |
| 👏 | 39 | 3.67% | |
| 😢 | 30 | 2.82% | |
| 😭 | 30 | 2.82% | |
| 🤩 | 16 | 1.51% | |
| 🎉 | 15 | 1.41% | |
| 👀 | 13 | 1.22% | |
| 💯 | 13 | 1.22% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 1.03% | |
| 🍓 | 8 | 0.753% | |
| 👾 | 2 | 0.188% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.094% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 112 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,063 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 112 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Voice message, posted without a caption
سلام عزیزم وقتتون بخیر من میخوام برا پیجم ادمین بگیرم ولی در جریان تعرفه ها نیستم؛ خواستم بدونم چجوری با ادمین حساب میکنین دقیقا؟ پیج من فعلا ۱۶۰ تا فالور داره و هیچ فعالیتی نداشته تالان و قراره از صفر شروع بشه
Voice message, posted without a caption
سلام وقتتون بخیر من یه دانشجو هستم هیچ شغلی هم ندارم اما در مورد ادمینی شنیدم دوست دارم پول دربیارم شرایط اینو ندارم برم بیرون کار کنم میشه کمکم کنید این دوره ای که گذاشتید برای شرایط من اوکیه ثبت نام کنم من هیچی از ادمینی نمیدونم اصلا بعد اینکه دوره ثبت نام کردم میتونم کار کنم
کد تخفیف اعمال شد برای اکانت شما تا ۲۴ ساعت! یعنی فقط با ۱،۹۰۰ میتونید ثبتنام کنید ✅ در کنار تمام سرفصلهای تخصصی بالا شما یک هدیه به ارزش ۵میلیون دریافت میکنید! ( دسترسی به دوره ی پــولــســـاز که تمام تکنیک های فروش از فضای آنلاین داخلش هست ) 📌لطفا قبل واریزی هایلایت ( سوالات شما ) رو چک کنید تمام توضیحات تکمیلی رو دادیم . ( مثلا دوره در تلگرام برای راحتی شماست، بصورت ویدیو، ویس، عکس و تمرین و پرسش پاسخ طراحی شد…
❤2
بیداااارید..؟🦉
👍1
نصف شبی کد تخفیف بذارم براتون ؟!
آخ قربونت برم ایشالا برکت داشته باشه برات و همیشه پر روزی باشی ✨👏🏻
❤3
محدثه جون من ویساتونو گوش کردم وخیلی باهاتون موافقم امروز جمع درامدم شد ۱۲ میلیون شاید از نظر خیلیا کم باشه اما من هیچ درامدی از پیجم نداشتم حتی هزارتومن و همشو مدیون شمام❤️❤️❤️
❤2
اینم از ایدی پشتیبانی برای ثبت نام @mimshgraph
ببخشید طولانی شد چون سوالاتتون زیاد بود خواستم خیلی کامل توضیح بدم 🥹❤️
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 112 posts we hold for @mimshgraphy_admin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mimshgraphy_admin edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 23 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 10 October 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
👆کدوم استوری بنظرتون بهتره ؟
- استوری سمت راست95%
- استوری سمت چپ7%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 112 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 22 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@mimshgraphy_admin named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 23 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@abzarstoryAsma · 97,447#1
@paari_edit · 65,069#2
@nesa_piruzi · 120,877#3
@mary_anill · 22,609#4
@vahidisho · 1,926#5
@dore_mohadese · 22,383#6
@saharmoradkhani70 · 24,653#7
@txt_nabat11 · 11,989#8
@a_yasamingram · 5,987#9
@motaharesadeghii · 12,361#10
@arezooedit2 · 24,026#11
@khanemohtavaa · 21,210#12
@nahalkhodaei · 38,207#13
@karentteam · 90,052#14
@GandomAura · 6,270#15
@editor_mahdieh · 17,376#16
@iiaida_p · 1,642#17
@barkav_designer · 20,567#18
@lana_radmhr · 29,696#19
@Haamii_abzar · 1,745#20
@tarangraphy · 6,427#21
@saedcurly · 67,317#22
@unigram_plus · 3,801#23
@izan_edit · 22,276#24
@esmailedit · 12,082#25
@pichakedit · 22,754#26
@marjan_amini1 · 5,705#27
@Atiyephotography · 1,392#28
@radioliaa · 10,593#29
@edit_sarino · 1,636#30
@fontoapp · 9,513#31
@editparisaa · 5,057#32
@banafshak1 · 9,370#33
@yasi_desiign · 4,236#34
@tosofir · 13,901#35
@w3bniko · 1,942#36
@hania_sarmad · 28,165#37
@editor_mitraa · 20,788#38
@daminparvari · 4,636#39
@editlearn_ir · 5,736#40
@textstori15 · 25,725#41
@lonispy · 921#42
@banka_contenta · 2,485#43
@faezehjafari_ideas · 8,109#44
@admi_n_raz · 33,393#45
@editorelnaaz · 14,508#46
@bndcoffeee · 1,304#47
@faatemeeam · 10,397#48
@mahshyd_textbox_admin · 4,388#49
@panahe_nabat · 44,261#50
@Sharifi_marketing · 12,326#51
@accademisaraezty · 7,243#52
@fereshtesocialmedia · 35,111#53
@sogoli_asrar · 7,239#54
@Pleindeviee · 2#55
@ideastory_tara · 10,047#56
@toibastaar · 7,347#57
@neginfarhangi · 32,225#58
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@paari_edit · 65,069
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
@matinehrouhii · 19,916
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 September 2026
@nesa_piruzi · 120,877
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
@mary_anill · 22,609
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
@saedcurly · 67,317
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 August 2026
@dore_mohadese · 22,383
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 19 September 2026
@arezooedit2 · 24,026
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 15 September 2026
@textstori15 · 25,725
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 14 September 2026
@abzarstoryAsma · 97,447
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
@khanemohtavaa · 21,210
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 September 2026
@neginfarhangi · 32,225
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 3 September 2026
@samaedit · 134,590
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 August 2026
@panahe_nabat · 44,261
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 27 August 2026
@fereshtesocialmedia · 35,111
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محدثه شجاع پور | ادمینی و آموزش اینستاگرام” (@mimshgraphy_admin), 36,034 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mimshgraphy_admin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.