Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MiniDraft Plays

Channel

MiniDraft Plays

@minidraftgamble

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20,283subscribers

+7,170 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002425312735
TypeChannel
Username@minidraftgamble
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/minidraftgamble

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,45127,17219,811.57 August 2026 — 13,113 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,888 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,748 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,531 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,494 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,439 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,257 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,080 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,706 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,570 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,311 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,446 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,106 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,733 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,451 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,395 subscribers25 August 2026 — 27,172 subscribers27 August 2026 — 27,122 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,961 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,546 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,101 subscribers31 August 2026 — 25,769 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,585 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,377 subscribers3 September 2026 — 24,978 subscribers5 September 2026 — 24,698 subscribers8 September 2026 — 23,964 subscribers11 September 2026 — 23,192 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,603 subscribers14 September 2026 — 20,948 subscribers16 September 2026 — 20,436 subscribers18 September 2026 — 20,283 subscribers20,2837 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net +7,170. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,243–29,380 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 14:3620,283-153
16 Sept 2026, 04:4020,436-512
14 Sept 2026, 13:1720,948+1,345
13 Sept 2026, 02:5819,603-3,589
11 Sept 2026, 07:5823,192-772
8 Sept 2026, 12:3623,964-734
5 Sept 2026, 04:4124,698-280
3 Sept 2026, 13:0024,978-399
2 Sept 2026, 04:1325,377-208
1 Sept 2026, 07:1525,585-184
31 Aug 2026, 08:5725,769-332
30 Aug 2026, 05:3726,101-445
29 Aug 2026, 01:5726,546-415
28 Aug 2026, 01:2326,961-161
27 Aug 2026, 02:2827,122-50
25 Aug 2026, 23:0227,172+2,777
25 Aug 2026, 01:3624,395+11,944
23 Aug 2026, 15:1212,451-282
22 Aug 2026, 00:1812,733-373
20 Aug 2026, 16:2213,106first reading

Engagement

199 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.10%
avg views ÷ 20,283 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,840
75 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
75
of 199 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 64 of 75 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held199 (31 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total138,365
Reactions total3,037
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9,020 reactions across 180 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,00322.2%
1,95021.6%
🔥1,94921.6%
🎉1,88020.8%
😁8619.55%
👏2733.03%
🐳300.333%
200.222%
🏆120.133%
👎110.122%
🤮80.089%
❤‍🔥70.078%
💯70.078%
😢70.078%
💩20.022%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 181 of the 199 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,020 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 199 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 08:11 UTC≈1,340 views50 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

I’ve grabbed a bag of $CACHE Would i suggest blasting here, prolly not (Im mentally challenged, so i did.) find an entry you like. But here’s my thesis/though process on taking the trade: SNDK 1 preforming stock this year in the s&p 500. Yet no runner for it? Cache cow, word play for cashcow a famous term in the finance sector. The whole play of these paired tokens are to essentially you being long on the pair.

🔥1413👍13🎉10

2 Sept 2026, 16:30 UTC≈2,440 views32 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

$WHAT 🔥 Let's take a gamble on this, guys. It has the potential to take off because the team behind it seems really strong 0x3a540c0B458476EBDf6Cb3e1F2585c9724077fa0 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x070265bd025c7ab872e9561076d6fc3cabc340b9f50dfa1c4d6406f93d8ed85c

👏108👍8🔥6

2 Sept 2026, 13:39 UTC≈1,330 views29 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

3X⬆️ on $BITTY The thesis is simple. Hold $BITTY, Earn $BTC. $BTC rewards is tokenized by Coinbase on Robinhood Chain, narrative involving two of the biggest companies in crypto. 0xb37Fa83d973038e35d06F98A711328A762B7d5f7

👏10🎉8👍6🔥5

2 Sept 2026, 12:50 UTC≈2,440 views40 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

$KITTY, moving well claimed the ath of 2.4M which is 4x call from the entry of 600k and i think this is just the starting IT HAS WAY MORE POTENTIAN THAN WHERE ITS STANDING RN Letme quickly sumup the narrative for you its holders receiving $GME rewards. If AI cat coins can run past $200M, imagine what a Roaring Kitty with real GME yield can do. The narrative is obvious. The path is there. Morever the efforts fro

🎉13🔥13👍95

2 Sept 2026, 12:49 UTC7 views49 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

We still haven’t seen the real beta to $CASHCAT. I think $SWOLE might finally be it. Vlad originally tweeted the meme back in 2021 — this is literally where the whole $CASHCAT lore comes from. If $CASHCAT eventually reaches $1B+, the beta trade could get absolutely insane. And a lot of the top $CASHCAT holders are already here. The meme stands on its own, the connection is real, and the setup looks too clean to

🎉15👍1311👏10

2 Sept 2026, 12:05 UTC≈2,500 views47 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

$KITTY sending hard and tapped new ath now ...around 2x from call 💥 $600k ➡️ $1.3M Keep printing 🤪 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x338c837eefacebd7f007acf689e3553b047f9a33820986845ed03950d4bb5037

👍1712🎉10🔥8

2 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,430 views39 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Bought some $ROBLOXIANS here on RH at 240k The cult of Roblox paired with the Roblox stock on Robinhood Aiming to have everyone change their pfp to the Roblox version of themself Could be the first stock cult runner, never seen that before Fresh launch so watch for your entries 0xB528a38eA684eD26ea0Eee9de5d222DA6228c10D https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x3280b21b63df584e8d4afb8cabd0e031eca1b4f13d64fb06456867b3

13👏11👍8🎉7

2 Sept 2026, 09:53 UTC≈2,440 views34 reactionsread 3 September 2026

$KITTY Bought a bag in here cause i like this narrative on Robinhood + holders receive $GME rewards. If AI cat coins can run over 200 million, a Roaring Kitty with real GME yield has an obvious path. Many big buyers are getting into it which tells me they know something.... 600k Dyor 0x96F10D7A43639B9c7e09aee5304C406670289aB4 https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x338c837eefacebd7f007acf689e3553b047f9a33820986845ed

👏11🎉8👍87

2 Sept 2026, 08:40 UTC≈1,350 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

I bought some $BITTY - The Bitcoin Mascot. 0xb37Fa83d973038e35d06F98A711328A762B7d5f7 You get paid in $BTC for holding $BITTY Almost every major internet culture platform eventually gets some kind of recognizable character or mascot. Linux has Tux. Reddit has Snoo. Microsoft has Clippy SpaceX has Shrub the hedgehog Likewise the backbone of crypto - Bitcoin, has $Bitty. The character dates back to about 2015

🎉13👍1312🔥10

2 Sept 2026, 08:11 UTC≈2,490 views41 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#BTC is now building a falling wedge pattern, but price is still inside the interval with mixed sentiment in the market. Waiting for the price to break the highs/lows or for a pattern break.

👍13🎉109🔥9

2 Sept 2026, 07:51 UTC≈1,340 views44 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Still in $FONE. Everyone is busy writing off Solana while $FONE is quietly setting up for a higher timeframe cook. Robinhood is MOGGING right now, no question. But markets don’t need every chain to run. $FONE just needs to be the one Solana runner that catches attention. One narrative ignition → liquidity rotates → everything changes.

🔥15👍1311🎉5

1 Sept 2026, 20:27 UTC≈2,450 viewsread 3 September 2026

🔥 stock [7.6x] ├ TheMiniDraft └ 20.3K → 154.5K (10m) 0xb68188ae4f8bd7fabbf9de25ed6a27c82c1d2be0

Showing the 12 most recent of 199 posts we hold for @minidraftgamble. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MiniDraft Plays” (@minidraftgamble), 20,283 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minidraftgamble.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.