Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for المُهَنَّد

Channel

المُهَنَّد

@mmxxlllmm

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,253subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002591197463
TypeChannel
Username@mmxxlllmm
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mmxxlllmm

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (4 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@mmxxlllmm/1571 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 20:31 UTC@mhmatalden/34130 Jul 2026, 20:32 UTC1.0072 seconds
@mmxxlllmm/1572 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 21:10 UTC@mhmatalden/34230 Jul 2026, 21:15 UTC1.004 minutes
@mmxxlllmm/1574 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC@mhmatalden/3482 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC1.002.1 hours
@mmxxlllmm/1583 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC@mhmatalden/3574 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@mhmatalden5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004 minutesthis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @mmxxlllmm — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2,2272,2702,248.56 August 2026 — 2,270 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,270 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,267 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,269 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,261 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,251 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,246 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,242 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,239 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,235 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,239 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,244 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,230 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,227 subscribers19 September 2026 — 2,253 subscribers2,2536 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 45 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,221–2,276 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:212,253+26
14 Sept 2026, 23:162,227-3
11 Sept 2026, 07:192,230-14
6 Sept 2026, 14:172,244+5
1 Sept 2026, 18:242,239+4
29 Aug 2026, 17:042,235-4
26 Aug 2026, 20:122,239-3
23 Aug 2026, 11:462,242-4
19 Aug 2026, 20:022,246-5
16 Aug 2026, 15:062,251-10
12 Aug 2026, 11:552,261-8
9 Aug 2026, 17:022,269+2
6 Aug 2026, 18:102,267-3
6 Aug 2026, 05:522,270no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:322,270first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 22s
Average length
1m 11s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

339 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤22466.1%
👍7020.6%
💔3610.6%
❤‍🔥51.47%
🔥41.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 339 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC389 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

[ الحشيش سبب في التخنث والدياثة ] قال الإمام ابن تيمية - رحمه الله -: " الحشيشة أخبث من الخمر من جهة أنها تفسد العقل والمزاج حتى أنه يصير في الرجل تخنث ودياثة وغير ذلك من المفاسد" «الفتاوى ١٧٧/٥» اترك هذا النجس قبل أن تصل لنهايات مُخزية .. #النشر_على_أوسع_نطاق

❤16👍4

4 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC484 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"من عرفَ التاريخ عاش الزمان كله " معنى هذه المقولة: أي يربط الماضي بالحاضر ، فالتاريخ يُعيد نفسه . وهذا يوسع عقلك ، ويقوي نظرك في الأحداث والوقائع .

❤13👍6

3 Aug 2026, 23:12 UTC≈1,870 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

المؤمن يفرح لفرح أخيه المؤمن ويحزن لحزنه .. قال النبيﷺ "وَالَّذِي نَفْسُ مُحَمَّدٍ بِيَدِهِ لَا يُؤْمِنُ أَحَدُكُمْ حَتَّى يُحِبَّ لِأَخِيهِ مَا يُحِبُّ لِنَفْسِهِ " متفق عليه. مبارك النجاح للجميع .. ومن لم ينجح هذه السنة فتذكر : ●هي دنيا●.. فالنجاح الحقيقي : النجاح بالدين والجنة.. نسأل الله أن يُنجحنا بالفردوس الأعلى من الجنة..

❤21👍4🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC518 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

انتهينا-بفضل الله- من دراسة العقيدة الحموية... وسنبدأ-بإذن الله-بالكتاب الثالث من دراسة الرد : وهو " العقيدة التدمرية " نسأل الله التوفيق والسداد ..

❤7👍2🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC589 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

الليلة-بإذن الله- بعد صلاة العشاء الدرس الأخير من القراءة و التعليق على : (الفتوى الحموية) نسأل الله العلم النافع والعمل الصالح.. المجلس سيكون على البث : https://t.me/mmxxlllmm

❤7👍4❤‍🔥3

2 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC≈1,430 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

الـسَّـاحِـل الـسُّـورِي 🍃 200 جوهرة من بناتنا في اللَّاذقيَّة يتحلَّينَ بالخمار الشَّرعيِّ، و قد تعهَّدنَ علىٰ الالتزام به مع غِطاء الوجه طاعةً للّٰهِ و لرسولهِ ﷺ . [ شَرَّفَنَا في هـٰذا الملتقىٰ عدد من أخوَاتنا المُثقَّفات اللَّواتي اهتدَينَ - بفضل اللّٰه - للإسلام ] و قد تخلَّل المُلتقىٰ: - مُحاضرة تَوعويَّة. - مُسابقة تفاعليَّة - توزيع كتُب دينيَّة - جوائز تحفيزيَّة نسألُ اللّٰهَ لهُنَّ الثَّبات و الزِّيادة ف…

❤22👍3🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 19:57 UTC913 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

المسلمات في مخيم الروج يتعرضنَ لإبتلاء عظيم من أعداء الله .. حسبنا الله ونعم الوكيل .. اللهم كن لهم عوناً ونصيراً .. قدم ما تستطيع ( انصرهم بلسانك ..بمالك ..بنفسك .. ، اثارة قضيتهم في وسائل التواصل ..والخطب ..والدروس ) لا تتفرج وكأن الأمر لا يعنيك .. لابد أن يزيد مستوى اهتمامنا بقضايا الأمة .. وصاحب الهم يوفقه الله للعمل ..

❤14💔12👍2

30 Jul 2026, 21:10 UTC870 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

انتفاضة في مدينة حماة بإنكار ظاهرة الكفر المنتشرة .. [ من أسباب هذه الغضبة ما حصل أن بعض سائقي المكاري تجرأ على سب الله-والعياذ بالله- وعندما انكر عليهم أحد الموجودين قاموا بضربه بحديدة على رأسه دخل بسببها العناية المُركزة ] #إنكار_الكفر_واجب_على_كل_مسلم #عظّم_ربك_ولا_تكفر_به

❤30👍7🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mmxxlllmm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“المُهَنَّد” (@mmxxlllmm), 2,253 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mmxxlllmm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.