Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мог бы догадаться

Channel

Мог бы догадаться

@mogbydog

Not marked by Telegram, checked 22 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,119subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002237963067
TypeChannel
Username@mogbydog
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mogbydog

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1191,1411,13021 August 2026 — 1,138 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,139 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,141 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,139 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,137 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,135 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,128 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,125 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,119 subscribers21 August 202618 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 28 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,116–1,144 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 09:011,119-6
13 Sept 2026, 22:191,125-3
10 Sept 2026, 10:361,128-7
5 Sept 2026, 04:421,135-2
1 Sept 2026, 03:161,137-2
28 Aug 2026, 20:551,139-2
25 Aug 2026, 22:331,141+2
22 Aug 2026, 12:461,139+1
21 Aug 2026, 12:451,138first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 28 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
28s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

690 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁20229.3%
custom 578757887214905363717525.4%
🤣16824.3%
537.68%
😭395.65%
🔥202.90%
💯91.30%
💅81.16%
🌚60.87%
🤡60.87%
🙏20.29%
👍10.145%
🥰10.145%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 690 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2025 to 8 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Sept 2025, 17:18 UTC≈1,800 views43 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣14custom 578757887214905363713😭10😁51

8 Sept 2025, 11:59 UTC≈1,680 views31 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁149custom 57875788721490536377🤣1

5 Sept 2025, 17:49 UTC≈1,500 views46 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Надеемся, что Егор скинул это Мизулиной Иначе зачем это всё...

😁18🤣12custom 5787578872149053637122🤡2

5 Sept 2025, 10:55 UTC≈1,430 views34 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭13😁9custom 578757887214905363773🤣2

4 Sept 2025, 19:15 UTC≈1,170 views39 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Forwarded from @dbgnaVideo

этот рилс сделал мне вечер, пусть и вам сделает АААААААААА 🤣🤣🤣🤣

custom 578757887214905363715🔥11😁8💅41

4 Sept 2025, 14:20 UTC963 views32 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣13custom 57875788721490536379😁5🔥31🥰1

4 Sept 2025, 13:02 UTC≈1,010 views55 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

так и представляю себя бабкой в кресле-качалке, ко мне подбегают внуки и кричат: «Ба, нам какую-то херню по истории задали», а я им: «Цыц, блохоносы, сейчас я вам всё расскажу»

🤣29😁12custom 5787578872149053637112🌚1

3 Sept 2025, 14:44 UTC908 views39 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Моя мама рассказывает про меня подружкам

😁16🤣14custom 578757887214905363762👍1

2 Sept 2025, 10:33 UTC916 views39 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁15🤣107custom 57875788721490536374🔥3

1 Sept 2025, 19:05 UTC961 views20 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Мальчик: духи, кольцо, айфон Мужчина: книга

🤣8custom 57875788721490536377😁5

1 Sept 2025, 14:37 UTC826 views37 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭16😁9custom 57875788721490536378🤣4

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mogbydog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Aug 2025, 06:40 UTCAnonymous Poll202 voters

Ваша любимая каша?

  1. Овсяная24%
  2. Гречневая31%
  3. Манная21%
  4. Рисовая25%
  5. Ячневая4%
  6. Пшеничная14%
  7. Перловая6%
  8. Тоже непростой вопрос21%

The shares total 146%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2025 to 8 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ору, мисс!
@miss_oru · 63,958
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Девичник 💍
@girl_humor · 54,349
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
бабские записки ✨
@girl_notess · 26,380
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 September 2026
Милые котики😻
@koticatsme · 55,873
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
Бывшие 🎭
@buvchiy · 40,020
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
Баба Зоя
@babazoyka · 87,450
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мог бы догадаться” (@mogbydog), 1,119 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mogbydog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.