دم تاملند گرم امسال حسابی ترکونده 😍❤️

Channel
فیزیک نوکنده 1406
@moghariorg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
51,560subscribers
-1,781 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001685519307 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @moghariorg |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/moghariorg |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 51,560 | +47 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 51,513 | +148 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:42 | 51,365 | +110 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:15 | 51,255 | +66 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 51,189 | +59 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 51,130 | +105 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 51,025 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:26 | 51,024 | -47 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 51,071 | -20 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 51,091 | +55 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 51,036 | +44 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 50,992 | +71 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 50,921 | +13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 50,908 | -66 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 50,974 | +85 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 50,889 | +115 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 50,774 | -335 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 51,109 | -903 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 52,012 | -875 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 52,887 | first reading |
Engagement
137 posts held, back to 26 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.101%
- avg views ÷ 51,560 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 52.3
- 79 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.069%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 79
- of 137 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 79 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 137 (26 February 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,133 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 04:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 28
- Links
- 36
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 18s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 92.3% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 137 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 137 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
😱تخفیف تکرار نشدنی 40% تاملند به مناسبت بازگشت به مدارس 💪 Back to School🎒 ✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️ 😎 یه فرصت ویژه برای اینکه سر کلاس استاد مورد علاقهت بشینی! ❤️ تخفیف 40% بگیر و سر کلاس بهترین اساتید ایران حاضر شو! ❤️ دریافت کد تخفیف از بات تلگرام تاملند⬇️⬇️ ➡️ @tamland_official_bot ➡️ @tamland_official_bot
ناموصا چنل خود معین کرمیه؟؟؟؟
غیرت داشته باش با همین برنامه ببند پرونده کنکورو☝🏼
بچه هایی که واسه شروع نیاز به برنامه دارید اینجا واستون رایگان میزاریم : 👉@barname نیاز داشتید استفاده کنید❤️
💛دکتر مرادی، والتر وایت شیمی منتظرته💛 💚 برای ثبت نام رایگان در کارگاه👇👇 🟢 @Nikmanesh_academybot 🟢
💛دکتر مرادی، والتر وایت شیمی منتظرته💛 💚 برای ثبت نام رایگان در کارگاه👇👇 🟢 @Nikmanesh_academybot 🟢
💛دکتر مرادی، والتر وایت شیمی منتظرته💛 💚 برای ثبت نام رایگان در کارگاه👇👇 🟢 @Nikmanesh_academybot 🟢
💚کارگاه رایگان روش مطالعه شیمی💚 📝یکشنبه 29 شهریور 📝 ➕ساعت 21:00➕ 💚نیک منش،مشاوره تخصصی کنکور💚 💛 دکتر محمد مرادی 💛 💛والتر وایت شیمی ایران💛 برای ثبت نام رایگان در کارگاه روی ربات بزنید👇👇👇👇👇👇 🟢@Nikmanesh_academybot ✔️ 🟢@Nikmanesh_academybot ✔️
تاثیر رل زدن بر کنکور از زبان معین کرمی :))))))))
💛دکتر مرادی، والتر وایت شیمی منتظرته💛 💚 برای ثبت نام رایگان در کارگاه👇👇 🟢 @Nikmanesh_academybot 🟢
💚کارگاه رایگان روش مطالعه شیمی💚 📝یکشنبه 29 شهریور 📝 ➕ساعت 21:00➕ 💚نیک منش،مشاوره تخصصی کنکور💚 💛 دکتر محمد مرادی 💛 💛والتر وایت شیمی ایران💛 برای ثبت نام رایگان در کارگاه روی ربات بزنید👇👇👇👇👇👇 🟢@Nikmanesh_academybot ✔️ 🟢@Nikmanesh_academybot ✔️
Showing the 12 most recent of 137 posts we hold for @moghariorg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@moghariorg edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 16 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 10 September 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@nokande_fizick · 62,4789 postsTamland | تاملند
@tamland · 92,9106 postsشکل_زیست💯
@Shekl_Zist · 64 postsکلاسینو
@clasino · 433 postsTamland_official
@Tamland_official_bot · 14,6653 postsادبیات یکتا 1406
@adabiat_ostadyekta · 93,9381 postفیزیک قضاتی 1406
@amirghozaty · 123,5791 postریاضی حیدری 1406
@arianheedari · 61,7451 postAtrina *
@atrina · 1971 postDark | دارک کنکور
@dark_kunkor · 44,0971 postدینی فکری 1406
@dinifekri_cls · 89,6691 postفرناز
@Farnaz · 961 postزیست فرزام فرهمندنیا 1406
@farzam_jon · 95,0011 postزیست عظیمی 1406
@haniifazimi · 100,9471 postفیزیک براتی 1406
@mehti_barati · 65,8631 postفیزیک یحیوی 1406
@mehti_yahyavi · 77,9871 postعربی میثم فلاح 1406
@meiysam_fallah · 85,1081 postریاضی کرمی 1406
@ryazimoeen5776 · 139,5771 postعربی واعظی 1406
@vaezijoooooon · 52,6231 postzaban_ghooreishi
@zaban_ghooreishi · 1551 postزبان کیاسالار و قریشی 1405
@zabankiasalarr · 49,1351 postزبان زینعلی و قیومی 1405
@zabannzeynali · 45,9431 postزیست عمارلو 1406
@zistaamarloo · 67,7881 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@moghariorg named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 22 posts, 8 August 2026 – 14 August 2026 · confirmed gone 20 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 5 posts, 1 September 2026 – 14 September 2026
named in 1 post, 10 September 2026 – 10 September 2026
named in 1 post, 2 September 2026 – 2 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@amirlotfichemist · 162#1
@nokande_fizick · 62,478#2
@zistamarloooe · 3,474#3
@canaltala · 197#4
@babaksadatorg · 12,368#5
@mirhosseeinii · 60,057#6
@zistaamarloo · 67,788#7
@riaziimalakpor · 8,842#8
@Farahani_shiimi · 32,579#9
@Etminan_Educational · 64#10
@S3Mars · 595 (as read 25 August 2026)#11
@CRtranslation · 203#12
@tiam_aj · 3,677#13
@fysickdelta · 650#14
@goodarzicounseling · 1,173 (as read 25 August 2026)#15
@therealtiredpotato · 9,777#16
@ShortNews_Persian · 258#17
@jookandsargarmii · 504#18
@Starse_org · 1,725#19
@maahshahrFile · 669 (as read 25 August 2026)#20
@HydroKhuzestan · 1,392 (as read 25 August 2026)#21
@Comentive · 203,579#22
@Noto_Chord · 424#23
@medicalSciences403 · 3,692#24
@zistshenasiparvin · 1,629#25
@parsajoooooooon · 89,270#26
@bookiaas · 232 (as read 25 August 2026)#27
@T1261T · 1,108 (as read 25 August 2026)#28
@drinksoftea · 65#29
@mehran_noviiiiin · 478#30
@biology10question · 3,468#31
@amarlohamedani · 1,194#32
@ZistaseMaze · 2,444#33
@dollarestann · 284#34
@TelUniversity · 6,520#35
@photolugy · 59#36
@Helli59 · 219#37
@BankEnsani_En · 1,040 (as read 25 August 2026)#38
@mamaniniya · 6,778#39
@NursingAcademy2016 · 6,757#40
@PDFNURSEE · 5,352#41
@Nejjadi · 262#42
@fizikmirhosini · 10,093#43
@jozvehadernalin · 4,620#44
@javaz_dini_arabi · 1,028#45
@gately_vpn · 1,720#46
@medicalwebfiles · 12,821#47
@wsgyg · 28,940#48
@physics_by_pdk · 620 (as read 25 August 2026)#49
@konkur_ario · 361#50
@moallemannews · 325,090#51
@maraghehac · 3,742#52
@Konkur_Promotion · 232#53
@Memwe_land · 23,830#54
@konkurnights · 2,243#55
@lisztomniaa · 284 (as read 25 August 2026)#56
@dinosbullshitwords · 176 (as read 25 August 2026)#57
@faraacoin · 146#58
@clasiinooorg · 57,584#59
@TurkUygarligi · 1,295#60
@turkdiledebiyat · 1,237#61
@ScrollBaz · 26,299#62
@turktarikhi20 · 1,633#63
@maraghehunisport · 851#64
@PargarOfficial · 1,813#65
@bilgulush · 1,061#66
@diagnos_academy · 2,928#67
@MohammadKhanQajar · 1,279#68
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nokande_fizick · 62,478
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
@mirhosseeinii · 60,057
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
@Asheghaneha11 · 26,453
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 September 2026
@clasiinooorg · 57,584
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@wsgyg · 28,940
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
@parsajoooooooon · 89,270
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فیزیک نوکنده 1406” (@moghariorg), 51,560 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moghariorg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.