Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
متون فقهی وکالت و ارشد
@motonefeghi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,245subscribers
+517 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001855983400 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @motonefeghi |
| Description | 🛑 تبلیغات پذیرفته می شود جهت هماهنگی به آیدی زیر پیام دهید : @jurist4544 لینک کانال ها و گروه ها: @motonefeghvekalat1401 @civillawir @groupmotonefeghvekalat1401 @motonefeghi @madanibayatvatavakkoly |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/motonefeghi |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 20:44 | 10,245 | +74 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:01 | 10,171 | +80 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:07 | 10,091 | -3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:46 | 10,094 | -2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 23:12 | 10,096 | +3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:30 | 10,093 | -8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:38 | 10,101 | +25 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 21:31 | 10,076 | +31 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:31 | 10,045 | -6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 23:30 | 10,051 | -9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 19:58 | 10,060 | -4 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 17:30 | 10,064 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:37 | 10,068 | -6 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:55 | 10,074 | -8 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 10,082 | +146 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:39 | 9,936 | +12 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:21 | 9,924 | -1 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 03:05 | 9,925 | +19 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 23:34 | 9,906 | +31 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 23:14 | 9,875 | first reading |
Engagement
302 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.56%
- avg views ÷ 10,245 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 263
- 28 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.692%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 28
- of 302 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 302 (6 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 7,356 |
| Reactions total | 23 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 22:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 313
- Videos
- 493
- Links
- 69
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
38 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 97.4% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 302 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 302 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🪴 دوره جدید ضربتی مشاهیر ۱۴۰۵ در چنل vip بارگزاری شد.
⭕️ برای دسترسی به جدیدترین فایل های تصویری و صوتی حقوقی (سال ۱۴۰۴ و ۱۴۰۵ ،) نکته و تست ، برنامه ، رفع اشکال، نکات مشاوره ای موجود در کانال خصوصی ( Vip ) به آیدی زیر کلمه « عضویت » را ارسال کنید : @jurist4544 @jurist4544 💳 هزینه برای همه دروس و دوره ها فقط مبلغ 《 یک میلیون تومان 》 می باشد. 🥎کانال اعتماد و نمونه دوره ها:👇 @khariddore 🌹🌹🌹 🦜 مزیت های کانال خصوصی : 📌دوره های جدید ۱۴۰۵ شامل : 🟢 …
🦋رضایت و قبولی قطعی در آزمون وکالت توسط یکی از ممبر های ویژه چنل VIP مون پیش از اعلام نتایج و با کلید پیشنهادی 💐
🔥 کاملترین و جامعترین پاسخنامه تشریحی سؤالات آزمون وکالت کانون وکلا دادگستری ۱۴۰۵منتشر شد ✅ پاسخ دقیق و تشریحی تمامی سؤالات ✅ بررسی گزینهها و تحلیل نکات مهم ✅ توضیح کامل راهحلها، مرحلهبهمرحله ✅ نکات کلیدی و آموزشی برای یادگیری عمیقتر ✅ مناسب برای رفع اشکال و مرور حرفهای 💎کاری از گروه آموزشی قلمداد
دفترچه پاسخنامه کانون وکلای 1405.pdf @motonefeghvekalat1401 @civillawir @motonefeghi
دفترچه سوالات آزمون وکالت کانون وکلای دادگستری ۱۴۰۵ @motonefeghvekalat1401 @civillawir @motonefeghi
🖌اقلام مورد نیاز جلسه آزمون وکالت: 🛑چند مداد مشکی نرم 🛑پاکن 🛑مداد تراش 🛑کارت ورود به جلسه 🛑کارت ملی یا شناسنامه 🛑ساعت مچی 🛑دستمال کاغذی یا پارچه ای 🛑بطری آب کوچک در بسته (پلاستیکی و شفاف باشد) 🛑مواد قندی مثل شکلات ، خرما یا مویز (بسته بندی شفاف داشته باشد) ✅این وسایل رو از روز یا شب قبل آزمون آماده کنید و یه جا قرار بدید که همه رو صبح با خودتون ببرید. تاکید می کنیم صبح آزمون تازه یادتون نیفته که بخواهید دنبال این و…
کارت ورود به جلسه پروانه کارآموزی کانون وکلا 1405منتشر شد👇👇 https://sanjesh.org 🔅🔅🔅 @motonefeghvekalat1401 @civillawir @motonefeghi
❤1
⭕️ دوره رتبه یک موسسه وکیلشو ۱۴۰۶ به چنل vip اضافه شده ✅
⭕️ برای دسترسی به جدیدترین فایل های تصویری و صوتی حقوقی (سال ۱۴۰۴ و ۱۴۰۵ ،) نکته و تست ، برنامه ، رفع اشکال، نکات مشاوره ای موجود در کانال خصوصی ( Vip ) به آیدی زیر کلمه « عضویت » را ارسال کنید : @jurist4544 @jurist4544 💳 هزینه برای همه دروس و دوره ها فقط مبلغ 《 یک میلیون تومان 》 می باشد. 🥎کانال اعتماد و نمونه دوره ها:👇 @khariddore 🌹🌹🌹 🦜 مزیت های کانال خصوصی : 📌دوره های جدید ۱۴۰۵ شامل : 🟢 …
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 302 posts we hold for @motonefeghi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 11 posts on @motonefeghi as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 7 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 21 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Polls
The 6 most recent of 103 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
15_《لو ادعى الزوج الانفاق مع اجتماعهما و يساره و انکرته....!》 《سراسری ۸۲》
- 1)فمعه الظاهر ومعها الاصل.47%
- 2)فمعها الظاهر و معه الاصل.20%
- 3)فمعها الظاهر و معه الظاهر ايضا.23%
- 4)فمعه الاصل ومعها الاصل ايضا.10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
14_با توجه به عبارت زیر منکر چه کسی است؟ 《المدعى هو الذي يترك لو ترك الخصومة و هو المعبر عنه بانه الذي يخلى و سكوته وقيل هو من يخالف قوله الاصل او الظاهر و المنكر مقابله فی الجميع》 《دکتری سراسری ۹۴- عمومی》
- 1)قولش موافق با اصل یا ظاهر است و اگر دعوی را رها کند به حال خود رها نمی شود.52%
- 2)قولش مخالف اصل است.17%
- 3)اگر سکوت کند؛ به حال خود رها می شود.22%
- 4)قولش موافق اصل عملی است ولی مخالف ظاهر است.9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
13_کدام مورد بر قاضی حرام است؟ (سراسری ۹۴)
- 1)الشفاعة الى المستحق فى اسقاط حق او الى المدعى في ابطال دعوى.12%
- 2)القضاوة مع اشتغال القلب بنعاس او هم او غضب.35%
- 3)تلقین احد الخصمين حجته.46%
- 4)ترغيب الخصمين في الصلح.8%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
12_ما هي الرشوة؟ (سراسری ۹۵)
- 1)ما اخذ من احد الخصمين بازاء الحكم.21%
- 2)ما اخذ من المدعى بازاء الحكم لو حكم له بباطل.16%
- 3)ما اخذ من احد الخصمين او من غيرهما بازاء الحكم.53%
- 4)ما اخذ من احد الخصمين بازاء الحكم لو حكم لهما بباطل.11%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
11_معنى صحيح《كما تحرم الرشوة على المرتشى تحرم على المعطى لاعانته على الاثم》 در کدام گزینه آمده است؟ 《دکتری سراسری ۹۳_ جزا》
- 1)همان طوری که دریافت رشوه حرام است راشی هم چون معاون جرم است مرتکب حرام شده است.16%
- 2)همان گونه که دادن رشوه حرام است معاونت در آن هم حرام و معاونت در گناه است.16%
- 3)همان گونه که گرفتن رشوه حرام است دادن آن نیز به دلیل کمک بر گناه حرام است.58%
- 4)همان طوری که دادن رشوه حرام است گرفتن آن هم حتی توسط واسطه حرام و کمک به جرم است.11%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
7_بنابر نظر شهید اول حکم قبول در عقد ضمان کدام است؟ 《فقه و حقوق ١٤٠٢》
- 1)تنها رضایت مضمون له کفایت میکند و قبول لازم نیست.29%
- 2)قبول مضمون له و مضمون عنه مجتمعاً لازم است.43%
- 3)قبول مضمون عنه کافی است.14%
- 4)قبول مضمون له کافی است.14%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 302 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@jazaghafoori · 59,824
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
@HOUSEBOOKLAW · 31,810
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 6 September 2026
@Ketabkhanehoghughi · 22,511
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 September 2026
@hoqoq99 · 35,603
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
@drseyedjafari · 58,385
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“متون فقهی وکالت و ارشد” (@motonefeghi), 10,245 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/motonefeghi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.