Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آیین دادرسی مدنی دکتر سیدجعفری

Channel

آیین دادرسی مدنی دکتر سیدجعفری

@drseyedjafari

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

54,840subscribers

+58 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001118538814
TypeChannel
Username@drseyedjafari
Descriptionمدرس تخصصی آیین دادرسی مدنی وکیل پایه یک دادگستری رتبه ۴ اختبار کانون مرکز فارغ التحصیل دانشگاه شهید بهشتی و دانشگاه تهران 📌پیج اینستاگرام: instagram.com/drseyedjafari 🌏لینک کانال قوانین خلقت: https://t.me/rules_of_creation @mashahiredanesh
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 30 November 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/drseyedjafari

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

54,70554,86554,7857 August 2026 — 54,782 subscribers7 August 2026 — 54,782 subscribers7 August 2026 — 54,781 subscribers9 August 2026 — 54,798 subscribers10 August 2026 — 54,809 subscribers11 August 2026 — 54,827 subscribers12 August 2026 — 54,834 subscribers14 August 2026 — 54,840 subscribers15 August 2026 — 54,864 subscribers16 August 2026 — 54,865 subscribers17 August 2026 — 54,860 subscribers18 August 2026 — 54,856 subscribers19 August 2026 — 54,839 subscribers21 August 2026 — 54,822 subscribers22 August 2026 — 54,808 subscribers24 August 2026 — 54,799 subscribers25 August 2026 — 54,771 subscribers26 August 2026 — 54,751 subscribers27 August 2026 — 54,737 subscribers28 August 2026 — 54,727 subscribers29 August 2026 — 54,720 subscribers31 August 2026 — 54,715 subscribers1 September 2026 — 54,722 subscribers2 September 2026 — 54,723 subscribers3 September 2026 — 54,705 subscribers5 September 2026 — 54,711 subscribers8 September 2026 — 54,746 subscribers11 September 2026 — 54,784 subscribers13 September 2026 — 54,755 subscribers15 September 2026 — 54,767 subscribers16 September 2026 — 54,764 subscribers19 September 2026 — 54,840 subscribers54,8407 August 202619 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net +58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54,681–54,889 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 08:5654,840+76
16 Sept 2026, 23:5754,764-3
15 Sept 2026, 04:1954,767+12
13 Sept 2026, 11:1654,755-29
11 Sept 2026, 14:1754,784+38
8 Sept 2026, 21:0154,746+35
5 Sept 2026, 14:2054,711+6
3 Sept 2026, 14:0154,705-18
2 Sept 2026, 09:4354,723+1
1 Sept 2026, 12:2554,722+7
31 Aug 2026, 11:5754,715-5
29 Aug 2026, 08:2654,720-7
28 Aug 2026, 08:4454,727-10
27 Aug 2026, 08:1754,737-14
26 Aug 2026, 05:0654,751-20
25 Aug 2026, 05:5854,771-28
24 Aug 2026, 06:4654,799-9
22 Aug 2026, 11:3454,808-14
21 Aug 2026, 00:3454,822-17
19 Aug 2026, 21:0254,839first reading

Engagement

139 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 54,840 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,760
96 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
96
of 139 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held139 (27 July 202623 September 2026)
Views total744,740
Reactions total7,830
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 16:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,250
Videos
178
Links
610

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 21s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10,449 reactions across 139 posts, in 50 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6,24759.8%
😐8988.59%
😁5765.51%
👍4324.13%
😍4013.84%
🤡3543.39%
👏3153.01%
🌭1871.79%
🥰1731.66%
🗿1040.995%
🤪840.804%
😭720.689%
🙏590.565%
🥴580.555%
❤‍🔥540.517%
🔥510.488%
🤨450.431%
💘420.402%
💯400.383%
🤔350.335%
30 further kinds2222.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 139 of the 139 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,449 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 07:24 UTC≈2,960 views74 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Voice message

پاسخ تحلیلی تست بالا👆 سطح تست: دشوار بیش از شصت و پنج درصد از داوطلبان، پاسخ اشتباه دادند❗️ #تست #اسناد #واخواهی

56🙏10🗿3👍2💘2🥰1

23 Sept 2026, 05:10 UTC≈3,720 views50 reactionsread 23 September 2026

سلام و درود حق بر عاشق ترین خالص ترین و دلسوز ترین استاد دنیا که نفسشم حق هست،استاد بزرگوارم فعل شما رو کار قلمداد کردن جفای در حق کلمه عشق هست،شما درحال عاشقانه عارفانه زندگی کردن هستید واسمون دعا کنید قبول بشیم وتبدیل شیم به یدالله و مثل شما عاشقانه عارفانه زندگی کنیم،هیچ لذتی بالاتر از بخشیدن به خلق الله نیست هیچ لذتی بالاتر از مفید بودن واسه خلق الله نیست من عاشقانه زندگی کردن شما و پدرم رو دیدم و با تمام و ج

31🤡10😐5🥰2💘1🆒1

22 Sept 2026, 17:50 UTC≈5,480 views61 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Poll

اصولا مهلت اظهار انکار و تردید…

  1. 1️⃣ تا اولین جلسه مرحله واخواهی است حتی اگر واخواهی خارج از مهلت باشد37%
  2. 2️⃣ تا اولین جلسه مرحله تجدیدنظرخواهی است17%
  3. 3️⃣ تا تا اولین جلسه مرحله واخواهی است فقط در صورتی که واخواهی در مهلت باشد18%
  4. 4️⃣ همه موارد31%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

48🥰7👍6

22 Sept 2026, 09:03 UTC≈7,010 views40 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

دوستانی که تجربه شنیدن ویس‌های این کانال رو داشتن کامنت بذارن ☺️🎧 حتما ویس‌های این کانال رو گوش کنید 🎙️ نشانی کانال انگیزشی و معنوی قوانین خلقت 👇 https://t.me/rules_of_creation

26👍14

22 Sept 2026, 05:15 UTC≈7,320 views205 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Voice message

پاسخ تحلیلی تست بالا👆 سطح تست: دشوار بیش از هشتاد و پنج درصد از داوطلبان، پاسخ اشتباه دادند❗️ #تست #کارشناسی

139🙏22👍17🥴10😍8💯4😁3💋1

21 Sept 2026, 10:39 UTC≈8,640 views112 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Poll

کدام گزینه صحیح است؟

  1. 1️⃣14%
  2. 2️⃣29%
  3. 3️⃣3%
  4. 4️⃣56%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

79🫡14👍10🔥4😍3💘2

21 Sept 2026, 10:38 UTC≈8,560 views152 reactionsread 23 September 2026

در صورتی که دادگاه پس از پایان مذاکرات طرفین، متوجه شود که پرونده آمادۀ صدور رأی است اما نیاز به محاسبات دقیق ریاضی توسط یک متخصص دارد، کدام اقدام صحیح است؟ ۱)دادگاه ملزم است ابتدا حکم قاطع صادر کرده و تعیین مبلغ را به مرحلۀ اجرای احکام واگذار کند. ۲)دادگاه باید قرار اعدادی (کارشناسی) صادر نماید و این قرار نشان‌دهنده پیروزی خواهان در دعوا است. ۳)دادگاه باید قرار ابطال دادخواست صادر کند زیرا خواهان ادلۀ کافی ارائه

103😐16👍9👌7🔥6💘5🤔5💯1

21 Sept 2026, 06:42 UTC≈8,680 views197 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Voice message

پاسخ تحلیلی تست بالا👆 سطح تست: دشوار بیش از نیمی از داوطلبان، پاسخ اشتباه دادند❗️ #تست #وکالت

147😍21👍18💘4🔥3🥰2😁2

20 Sept 2026, 09:33 UTC≈9,740 views87 reactionsread 23 September 2026

بله با کتاب جامع آدم این تستای سخت جزو آسون‌ترینا میشه برامون🤤🤲🏻😍😁

👍3624🤨9😐8🤪4🌭2🤡2😁2

20 Sept 2026, 08:50 UTC≈9,760 views95 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Poll

کدام گزینه صحیح است؟

  1. 1️⃣17%
  2. 2️⃣48%
  3. 3️⃣13%
  4. 4️⃣23%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🥰4129💯18🎃3🌭2😱2

20 Sept 2026, 08:49 UTC≈9,570 views90 reactionsread 23 September 2026

تست سخت 📝 خواهان دعوایی با خواسته «اثبات مالکیت یک قطعه زمین» مطرح می‌کند. او بهای خواسته را از نظر هزینه دادرسی بر اساس ارزش منطقه‌ای ملک تقویم کرده است. خوانده قصد دارد به بهای خواسته اعتراض کند تا پرونده را از قابلیت تجدیدنظر خارج کند. وضعیت این اعتراض چگونه است؟ الف) چون بهای خواسته بر اساس قیمت منطقه‌ای ملک تقویم شده، قابل اعتراض نیست ب) بهای خواسته حتی اگر بر اساس قیمت منطقه‌ای ملک تقویم شده باشد، قابل اعترا

72🙏7💔6👍5

20 Sept 2026, 02:52 UTC≈9,120 views39 reactionsread 23 September 2026

سلام و عرض ادب استاد عزیزم شبتون خوش💫🌹 خدارو صد هزار مرتبه شکر میکنم بابت اینکه سره راهه من قرار گرفتید من امروز این سعادت نصیبم شد با قانون زمان و توصیه های شما پیش برم 🥹🤲 و بعد مدتها به همه درسام رسیدم بدون خستگی و احساس خواب آلودگی شدید و مطالعه مفید منی که اکثر موقع ها یا شب نمیتونستم تا دیر وقت بمونم یا هم صبح نمیتونستم مثلا ۵ بیدارشم عالی بود جالب اینجاس من سمینار قانون زمان که تو اسپات پلیرم بود چندین بار باز

36💘3

Showing the 12 most recent of 139 posts we hold for @drseyedjafari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Sept 2026, 17:50 UTCAnonymous Poll2,280 voters approx.

اصولا مهلت اظهار انکار و تردید…

  1. 1️⃣ تا اولین جلسه مرحله واخواهی است حتی اگر واخواهی خارج از مهلت باشد37%
  2. 2️⃣ تا اولین جلسه مرحله تجدیدنظرخواهی است17%
  3. 3️⃣ تا تا اولین جلسه مرحله واخواهی است فقط در صورتی که واخواهی در مهلت باشد18%
  4. 4️⃣ همه موارد31%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Sept 2026, 10:39 UTCAnonymous Poll3,310 voters approx.

کدام گزینه صحیح است؟

  1. 1️⃣14%
  2. 2️⃣29%
  3. 3️⃣3%
  4. 4️⃣56%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Sept 2026, 08:50 UTCAnonymous Poll4,240 voters approx.

کدام گزینه صحیح است؟

  1. 1️⃣17%
  2. 2️⃣48%
  3. 3️⃣13%
  4. 4️⃣23%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTCAnonymous Poll1,310 voters approx.

📌مایلید سمینار قانون زمان رو به ضربتی ها هم هدیه بدیم؟

  1. ✅بله87%
  2. ❌خیر13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

موسسه مشاهیردانش
@mashahiredanesh · 80,822
#1
لذات مدنی - مهدی زارعی
@lazzatemadani · 66,330
#2
قوانین خلقت
@rules_of_creation · 26,426
#3
✳️ پایگاه خبری اختبار
@ekhtebar · 107,363
#4
️فایل حقوقی رابین هود️
@lawvoicee · 152,329
#5
باشگاه وکلای مشاهیر
@mashahirlawyers · 31,217
#6
🔵 وکلاپرس
@vokalapress · 28,554
#7
فایل حقوقی بیستون
@Bisootoonlaw · 115,936
#8
آرشیو زری و باران حق و عدالت ⚖
@baran_voicelaw_file · 72,032
#9
متون فقه - اصول فقه آزمون وکالت
@motoon_osool · 10,539
#10
حقوقی تایمز
@hoghooghitimes · 45,491
#11
دکتر ندا سیدجعفری
@drnedaseyedjafari · 5,652
#12
كانال حقوقی داداِستان⚖
@mydadestan · 39,341
#13
نکات و فایل آزمون وکالت
@lexcollege · 38,112
#14
نکته و تست قوانین خاص
@ghavaninekhas · 14,165
#15
🇮🇷اخبار حقوقی ایران 🇮🇷
@mosahebevekalat · 10,230
#16
چکیده ی آرای وحدت رویه
@arayevahdat · 11,560
#17
آکادمی جزا وکیفری سهامی
@jazakefari · 18,729
#18
فایل حقوقی زاگرس
@zagroslaww · 28,212
#19
تدریس ‌تخصصی‌ فقه ‌و‌‌ اصول ‌البچاری
@osoul_motoun · 4,991
#20
آکادمی وکیل سحر کرباسی
@academy_karbasi · 8,465
#21
کانال حقوقی امیرعلی آذری
@amiraliazarichanel · 3,727
#22
دوره های کاربردی🎀زری وباران☔️ ۱۴۰۲
@carbordi_karamooz · 39,759
#23
🌎همایش ها و رویدادهای حقوقی و صنفی(در پیوند با وکلای دادگستری)
@LAWCONFERENCES · 10,428
#24
آموزش حقوق/ الهام دلفانی
@delfanilaw · 11,437
#25
موسسه آموزش عالی آزادچتردانش
@chatredanesh · 13,739
#26
Droit channel
@droit_ir · 3,462
#27
مدرسه آنلاین حقوق | Lawcenter
@lawcenter_ir · 5,790
#28
چتردانش اهواز
@chatreahvaz · 17,785
#29
بنیاد حقوقی دادگو
@dadgoo_law · 301
#30
خبر رسان دادآفرین
@dadafarin_news · 14,664
#31
تست اساسی
@asasitest · 9,486
#32
محمد فرامرزی | مولف کتب آزمون وکالت ومصاحبه مرکزوکلا
@mohammad_faramarzi · 15,994
#33
کتابخانه حقوقی زری و باران📚
@Ketabkhanehoghughi · 21,763
#34
فایل حقوقی رابین هود
@voicelaw5040 · 13,219
#35
اصول‌ فقه تحلیلی (استاد بنی صدر)
@osool583 · 6,294
#36
موسسه مطالعات حقوقی دکتر محمدحسین شهبازی
@dr_shahbazi · 4,984
#37
آسان حقوق/دکتر کریمی منفرد
@asanhoghoghh · 7,228
#38
حقوق مدنی دادرس
@lawdadras · 15,931
#39
دپارتمان حقوق کاربردی چتردانش
@chatredanesh_vakil · 2,707
#40
مشاهیردانش تبریز
@mashahir_danesh_tabriz · 1,224
#41
رحا (رسانه حقوقی ایران)
@rahahoquqi · 8,688
#42
کانال حقوقی فاطمه صوفی آباد
@law_boook · 20,511
#43
مرکزوکلای قوه قضائیه استان اصفهان
@markazvokalaisfahan · 2,599
#44
آیین دادرسی مدنی | استاد شرقی
@ayin_dadrasi_madani · 13,730
#45
کانال جامع آزمون وکالت 1405
@hoqoq99 · 35,623
#46
پایگاه خبری پیشنیاز
@vokalaye_markazevokala · 4,336
#47
گروه حقوق موسسه آسیا
@Asia_hoghogh1 · 13,911
#48
انجمن علمی دانشجویی دانشگاه علوم قضایی و خدمات اداری
@anjomanelmi_ujsas · 5,877
#49
گروه تخصصی کاربردی وکالت/دادگستریار(ویژه وکلا،کارآموزان)
@karaamoz · 21,994
#50
⚖️ آوای قانون ⚖️
@hogogkhan_vekalat · 9,425
#51
🏆چتردانش ارومیه🏆
@chatre_uromie · 941
#52
آکادمی حقوق | دکتر علی فلاح
@dralifallah_lawacademy · 6,709
#53
FazeliAcademy
@Fazeliacademy · 13,477
#54
پایگاه خبری مجد
@majdlaw · 1,764 (as read 23 August 2026)
#55
متون فقهی وکالت و ارشد
@motonefeghi · 9,780
#56
💥 كانال جزاروز💥
@jazarooz_bakhshizadeh · 10,905
#57
حقوق شهرسازی
@kamyar_reza · 3,569
#58
شوق وکالت_مشاور آزمون وکالت
@shoghe_vekalaat · 7,338
#59
برنامه‌ریزی آزمون وکالت
@barnameriziyevekalt · 2,115
#60
سوالات مصاحبه مرکز وکلا و قضاوت
@ghezavatee · 2,864
#61
تدریس آیین دادرسی کیفری-سهامی
@kefaritadris · 3,169
#62
مرکز وکلای قوه قضائیه خراسان رضوی
@razavi_m_v · 4,311
#63
کانال‌رسمی‌وحیدقاسمی‌بیلواری
@ghanonkhani_vokala · 7,823
#64
کارآموزی وکالت (کارآموز یار)
@karamooz_vekalat · 23,644
#65
⚖️دادگاه مجازی⚖️
@Dadgahmajazi · 13,087
#66
انجمن‌حقوق‌شناسی
@iranianlls · 11,024
#67
فریبرز حدادی مشاوره آزمون وکالت
@fariborzhadadi_68 · 3,768
#68
Familegal
@Familegal · 2,405
#69
NEDAYE EDALAT⚖🗽
@NedayeEdalat2 · 3,466
#70
کانال تخصصی دکتری حقوق
@PHDDOkTORI · 5,471
#71
کانال حقوقی استاد رزاززاده_ قاضی دادگستری
@razazzade_judge · 19,597
#72
مدنی دان
@madanidan · 8,559
#73
دادگاه مجازی رابین‌ هود
@dadgahmajzi · 82,964
#74
کتابخانه حقوق⚖
@HOUSEBOOKLAW · 31,363
#75
بانک تست آیین دادرسی کیفری
@ayindadrasikayfarii · 8,858
#76
⚖تدریس مدنی ⚖
@fahimi1375 · 10,112
#77
انجمن علمی حقوق
@IranLawAssociation · 12,824
#78
چتر عدالت NEW
@chatr_edalatt · 8,536
#79
بانک تست حقوق
@Law_TesT2 · 62,500
#80
حقوق خصوصی
@hoghough_khososi · 38,619
#81
کانون وکلای مرکز
@kanoonevokalamarkaz · 21,343
#82
کانال رسمی اسكودا
@skoodaa · 12,629
#83
آثار و اندیشه‌های دکتر جواهرکلام
@drjavaherkalam · 8,110
#84
کانال فایل های آموزشی کارآموزان آزمون ۱۴۰۰
@kkkvdm1402 · 3,133
#85
قانون تایم | هوش مصنوعی حقوقی و قوانین صوتی
@vakil0098 · 2,837
#86

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

قوانین خلقت
@rules_of_creation · 26,426
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
لذات مدنی - مهدی زارعی
@lazzatemadani · 66,330
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
موسسه مشاهیردانش
@mashahiredanesh · 80,822
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
باشگاه وکلای مشاهیر
@mashahirlawyers · 31,217
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
كانال حقوقی داداِستان⚖
@mydadestan · 39,341
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
کانال تست رابین هود
@testerobinhood · 83,498
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
کتابخانه حقوقی زری و باران📚
@Ketabkhanehoghughi · 21,763
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 September 2026
🔵 وکلاپرس
@vokalapress · 28,554
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
فایل حقوقی بیستون
@Bisootoonlaw · 115,936
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 August 2026
دادگاه مجازی رابین‌ هود
@dadgahmajzi · 82,964
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
نکات و فایل آزمون وکالت
@lexcollege · 38,112
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
فایل حقوقی زاگرس
@zagroslaww · 28,212
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
️فایل حقوقی رابین هود️
@lawvoicee · 152,329
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
کانال جامع آزمون وکالت 1405
@hoqoq99 · 35,623
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
✳️ پایگاه خبری اختبار
@ekhtebar · 107,363
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
کتابخانه حقوق⚖
@HOUSEBOOKLAW · 31,363
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 6 September 2026
حقوقی تایمز
@hoghooghitimes · 45,491
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
آرشیو زری و باران حق و عدالت ⚖
@baran_voicelaw_file · 72,032
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
دوره های کاربردی🎀زری وباران☔️ ۱۴۰۲
@carbordi_karamooz · 39,759
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 30 August 2026
بانک تست حقوق
@Law_TesT2 · 62,500
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
گروه تخصصی کاربردی وکالت/دادگستریار(ویژه وکلا،کارآموزان)
@karaamoz · 21,994
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 September 2026
بانک حقوق️
@bankehoghogh · 46,885
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
حقوق خصوصی
@hoghough_khososi · 38,619
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آیین دادرسی مدنی دکتر سیدجعفری” (@drseyedjafari), 54,840 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drseyedjafari.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.