📣 پاسخنامهٔ تشریحی اساتید صاحبسبک داداستان منتشر شد. سؤالها، کلید و درسنامهٔ تشریحی هر ۷ درس آزمون وکالت کانونهای وکلای دادگستری، ۱۴ آبان ۱۴۰۵، در یک فایل ۱۱۴ صفحهای با فهرست کلیکپذیر آماده است. 👆 📚 اگر برای آزمون مرکز وکلای قوه قضائیه آماده میشید، نکتههای این درسنامه رو در مرور مباحث مشترک در نظر بگیرید. 📊 درصدهای خود را مشاهده و قبولیتان را تخمین بزنید! با ثبت مجدد پاسخهای خود در سامانه معدلگیری داداِست…

Channel
كانال حقوقی داداِستان⚖
@mydadestan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
43,300subscribers
+5,911 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001003745405 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mydadestan |
| Description | ⚖️بیش از ۱۵ سال سابقه در عرصه حقوق 🥇دارنده بالاترین ترازعلمی آزمون وکالت درکل کشور 🏆کسب ۲۸۱ رتبه تک رقمی و بیش از ۱۰ هزار نفر قبولی در آزمون وکالت 👨⚖دارنده اساتید صاحب سبک حقوق ایران ☎️02191090200 🌐dadestan.ir ارتباط با ادمین @Dadestanadmin |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mydadestan |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:58 | 43,300 | +1,551 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 23:35 | 41,749 | +212 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 01:19 | 41,537 | +75 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:27 | 41,462 | +81 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:46 | 41,381 | +152 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:46 | 41,229 | +8 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:10 | 41,221 | +83 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:36 | 41,138 | +26 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:09 | 41,112 | +35 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:44 | 41,077 | +105 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 20:47 | 40,972 | +167 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:15 | 40,805 | +19 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:56 | 40,786 | -13 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 40,799 | +44 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:57 | 40,755 | +69 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:19 | 40,686 | -25 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 40,711 | +42 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 10:00 | 40,669 | +51 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 11:55 | 40,618 | +51 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 09:37 | 40,567 | first reading |
Engagement
663 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 175 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.65%
- avg views ÷ 43,300 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,450
- 275 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 276
- of 663 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 663 (3 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 672,735 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 01:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈12,100
- Videos
- ≈885
- Links
- ≈6,220
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4h 55m
- Average length
- 8m 12s
Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 69 of 276 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔹 کارنامههای سامانه معدلگیری صادر شد! برای مشاهده کارنامه خود، مسیر زیر را دنبال کنید: ۱. وارد سایت dadestan.ir شوید. ۲. بخش «نیماد» را انتخاب کنید. ۳. روی «مشاهده کارنامه» کلیک کنید. ⏳ مهلت شرکت در سامانه معدلگیری محدود است. اطلاعات بیشتر 👇🏻 t.me/mydadestan/19412
📚 کلید سؤالات آزمون وکالت کانون وکلای دادگستری ۱۴ آبان ۱۴۰۵ | مطابق دفترچه F برای مشاهده پاسخنامه تشریحی و درسنامه هر درس، روی نام آن کلیک کنید: ۱) حقوق مدنی ۲) آیین دادرسی مدنی ۳) حقوق تجارت ۴) اصول و متون فقه ۵) حقوق جزا ۶) آیین دادرسی کیفری ۷) حقوق اساسی 📊 درصدهای خود را مشاهده و قبولیتان را تخمین بزنید! با ثبت مجدد پاسخهای خود در سامانه معدلگیری داداِستان از طریق لینک زیر 👇🏻 t.me/mydadestan/19412 داداِستا…
📚 پاسخنامه تشریحی حقوق اساسی آزمون کانون وکلا | ۱۴ آبان ۱۴۰۵ 🎯 بیشترین میزان تطبیق مباحث سؤالات حقوق اساسی با دورههای تفصیلی، تندر و اُمهات داداِستان آموزش مفهومی، تحلیل دقیق اصول قانون اساسی و تأکید بر نکات سؤالخیز در دورههای داداِستان، پشتوانهای برای مواجهه آگاهانه با سؤالات آزمون وکالت است. ☑️ پاسخنامه تشریحی حقوق اساسی را مطالعه کنید و نکات علمی و استدلال پاسخ هر سؤال را مرور کنید. پاسخنامههای تشریحی تمامی د…
📚 پاسخنامه تشریحی آیین دادرسی کیفری آزمون کانون وکلا | ۱۴ آبان ۱۴۰۵ 🎯 بیشترین میزان تطبیق مباحث سؤالات آیین دادرسی کیفری با دورههای تفصیلی، تندر و اُمهات داداِستان آموزش مفهومی، تحلیل دقیق مواد قانونی و تأکید بر نکات سؤالخیز در دورههای داداِستان، پشتوانهای برای مواجهه آگاهانه با سؤالات آزمون وکالت است. ☑️ پاسخنامه تشریحی آیین دادرسی کیفری را مطالعه کنید و نکات علمی و استدلال پاسخ هر سؤال را مرور کنید. پاسخنامهها…
📣 تکذیبیه رسمی داداستان درباره آزمون وکالت امروز در پی اعلام برخی داوطلبان درباره شباهت آموزشها و آزمونهای داداستان با سؤالات آزمون امروز، شایعه ارتباط این مجموعه با طراحان مطرح شده است. ⛔️ داداستان هرگونه ارتباط با طراحان یا دسترسی به سؤالات پیش از آزمون را قاطعانه تکذیب میکند. 📚 شباهت احتمالی مباحث، حاصل تسلط علمی اساتید، آموزشهای مفهومی، آزمونها و آمایشهای هدفمند و تألیفات آموزشی داداستان است. 🔗 متن کامل…
📚 پاسخنامه تشریحی آیین دادرسی مدنی آزمون کانون وکلا | ۱۴ آبان ۱۴۰۵ 🎯 بیشترین میزان تطبیق مباحث سؤالات آیین دادرسی مدنی با دورههای تفصیلی، تندر و اُمهات داداِستان آموزش مفهومی، تحلیل دقیق مواد قانونی و تأکید بر نکات سؤالخیز در دورههای داداِستان، پشتوانهای برای مواجهه آگاهانه با سؤالات آزمون وکالت است. ☑️ پاسخنامه تشریحی آیین دادرسی مدنی را مطالعه کنید و نکات علمی و استدلال پاسخ هر سؤال را مرور کنید. پاسخنامههای ت…
📚 پاسخنامه تشریحی حقوق مدنی آزمون کانون وکلا | ۱۴ آبان ۱۴۰۵ 🎯 بیشترین میزان تطبیق مباحث سؤالات حقوق مدنی با دورههای تفصیلی، تندر و اُمهات داداِستان آموزش مفهومی، تحلیل دقیق مباحث و تأکید بر نکات سؤالخیز در دورههای داداِستان، پشتوانهای برای مواجهه آگاهانه با سؤالات آزمون وکالت است. ☑️ پاسخنامه تشریحی حقوق مدنی را مطالعه کنید و نکات علمی و استدلال پاسخ هر سؤال را مرور کنید. پاسخنامههای تشریحی تمامی دروس آزمون وکال…
پاسخنامه تشریحی اصول و متون فقه آزمون کانون وکلا 14 آبان 1405 🎯 تطبیق موضوعی ۱۰۰ درصد سؤالات حقوق اصول و متون فقه با کلاسهای مفهومی و تطبیقی داداستان ☑️ بررسی ۲۰ سؤال اصول و متون فقه آزمون کانون وکلای دادگستری ۱۴۰۵ نشان میدهد که موضوعات ۲۰ سؤال، معادل ۱۰۰ درصد آزمون، با مباحث تدریسشده در کلاسهای داداستان تطبیق داشتهاند. 📚 آموزش مفهومی و تطبیقی و تأکید بر مباحث سؤالخیز، از ویژگیهای روش آموزشی داداستان است. …
پاسخنامه تشریحی حقوق تجارت آزمون کانون وکلا 14 آبان 1405 🎯 تطبیق موضوعی ۸۸ درصد سؤالات حقوق تجارت با کلاسهای مفهومی و جزوات داداستان ☑️ بررسی ۲۰ سؤال حقوق تجارت آزمون کانون وکلای دادگستری ۱۴۰۵ نشان میدهد که موضوعات بیش از ۱۷ سؤال، معادل ۸۸ درصد آزمون، با مباحث تدریسشده در کلاسهای داداستان تطبیق داشتهاند. 📚 آموزش مفهومی و تأکید بر مباحث سؤالخیز، از ویژگیهای روش آموزشی داداستان است. تمامی پاسخنامه های تمامی …
💙 «هرچه از حقوق یاد گرفتیم، مدیون داداستانیم…» میان تحلیل سؤالات آزمون، پیامهای پرمهر شما قشنگترین بخش کارگاه شد ✨ از رضایت از تدریس اساتید تا قدردانی از پشتیبانها؛ ممنونیم که همراهیمون رو میبینید و بهمون دلگرمی میدید 🌱 داداستان؛ مدرسه رتبههای یک وکالت ایران⚖
🔴هم اکنون کارگاه تحلیل سوالات حقوق جزا با استاد صاحب سبک دکتر مجید قاضی زاده مدرس حقوق جزا به شیوه رمز نگاری و تصویر سازی لینک ورود👇👇👇 https://dadestan.ir/my_live https://dadestan.ir/my_live
Showing the 12 most recent of 663 posts we hold for @mydadestan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mydadestan edited 29 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 11 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 5 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @mydadestan as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 6 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 29 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
❓این روز ها بیشتر درگیر کدومی؟
- مرور مطالب38%
- حل تست های سنوات17%
- استرس آزمون29%
- برطرف کردن نقاط ضعفم12%
- استراحت قبل آزمون 😉14%
- دیدن نتایج12%
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
به نظر شما چند درصد سوالات آزمون وکالت ۱۴۰۵ از موضوعات «جزوه شب امتحان وکالت» مطرح می شود؟
- کمتر از ۵ درصد33%
- بین ۵ تا ۱۰ درصد19%
- بین ۱۰ تا ۲۰ درصد22%
- بیشتر از ۲۰ درصد30%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
⚖️ آیا مایلید ببینید قبولشدگان انتهای جدول قبولی وکالت سال گذشته با چه درصدهایی قبول شدهاند؟
- بله، لطفا تصاویر کارنامه چند قبولی با درصدهای پایین یا حتی منفی را منتشر کنید.84%
- خیر، ما خودمان را فقط با رتبه های برتر مقایسه می کنیم نه قبولشدگان با درصدهای پایین16%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدام گزینه پاسخ است؟
- ۱37%
- ۲8%
- ۳12%
- ۴42%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
چقدر احتمال میدی شما برنده یک میلیارد تومان جایزه شوی؟
- ۱۰۰ درصد من یک میلیارد تومان را می برم.47%
- بیشتر از ۷۰ درصد14%
- بیشتر از ۵۰ درصد9%
- کمتر از ۵۰ درصد احتمال دارد برنده شوم34%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 663 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@KermanshahDadestan · 4017 postsداداِستان گرگان
@GorganDadestan · 37610 postsداداِستان گنبد
@GonbadkavoosDadestan · 817 postsمشاوران وکالت
@moshaveranvekalat · 2846 postsداداِستان کاشان
@dadestankashan · 735 postsداداِستان اردبیل
@Dadestan_Ardabil · 1332 postsدهکده سفید ( حقوق تخصصی )
@DehkadeSefid · 1,0382 postsبانک تست حقوق
@Law_TesT2 · 63,3042 postsبانک حقوق️
@bankehoghogh · 47,3292 postsحقوقی تایمز
@hoghooghitimes · 45,9962 postsروز تست⚖️
@rooztest · 3,4452 postsداداِستان همدان
@HamedanDadestan · 4881 postوکلا داداِستانی
@dadestanlawyer · 4,1021 postکانال حقوقی فاطمه صوفی آباد
@law_boook · 20,2001 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@bankehoghogh · 47,32959 postsبانک تست حقوق
@Law_TesT2 · 63,30445 postsنکته و تست حقوقی
@LAWw_test · 24,10613 postsخانم وکیل 👩⚖️⚖
@Miiss_Lawyer · 29,27913 postsدیوان حقوق
@divanhoghogh · 11,7859 postsکانال حقوقی فاطمه صوفی آباد
@law_boook · 20,2009 postsحقوقی تایمز
@hoghooghitimes · 45,9968 postsداداِستان کرمانشاه
@KermanshahDadestan · 408 postsکانال حقوق
@hoghoogh · 26,0996 postsحقوق مدنی دادرس
@lawdadras · 15,9346 postsروز تست⚖️
@rooztest · 3,4456 postsتست آزمونی حُقوق⚖️
@voic_law · 29,6916 postsدیدگاه داداِستانی ها
@dadestan1 · 5265 posts𝗡𝗼𝗼𝗿 𝗘𝗱𝗮𝗹𝗮𝘁
@Nooredalatlaw · 6,2495 postsتجارت خوان
@tejarat29 · 7,4025 postsآرای قضایی
@arayeghazayii · 28,9693 postsگروه تخصصی کاربردی وکالت/دادگستریار(ویژه وکلا،کارآموزان)
@karaamoz · 22,1253 postsدهکده سفید ( حقوق تخصصی )
@DehkadeSefid · 1,0382 postsای عدل ایران
@eadliran · 13,5402 postsتدریس های حقوقی جدید (حقوق بوک)
@HoghooghBook · 13,9842 postsبانک آرای قضایی
@Lawpress_Arayeghazayi · 21,6602 postsداداِستان اردبیل
@Dadestan_Ardabil · 1331 postداداِستان گرگان
@GorganDadestan · 3761 postمشاوران وکالت
@moshaveranvekalat · 2841 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@mydadestan named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 7 posts, 18 August 2026 – 31 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@ekhtebar · 108,760#1
@lazzatemadani · 66,750#2
@drseyedjafari · 58,348#3
@lawvoicee · 160,251#4
@chatredanesh · 13,907#5
@mashahiredanesh · 84,161#6
@hoghooghitimes · 45,996#7
@Bisootoonlaw · 117,955#8
@lawgroupnewsmashhad · 1,199#9
@ghafooriasli · 60,030#10
@ghezavatee · 2,872#11
@majdlaw · 1,779#12
@amoozesh_law · 13,950#13
@khorasanbar · 7,251#14
@azmunvekalatt · 1,732#15
@dr_shahbazi · 4,986#16
@pazhouhesh_law · 4,803#17
@fazelshiraz · 11,620#18
@mashahirlawyers · 30,905#19
@setareganvekalat · 5,911#20
@chatreahvaz · 17,626#21
@hoghough_khososi · 129#22
@chatredanesh_vakil · 2,774#23
@erfanakbari_official_law · 6,470#24
@voic_law · 29,691#25
@Law_TesT2 · 63,304#26
@Fazeliacademy · 14,974#27
@nedayeqanoon · 41,947#28
@dr_dashtbani · 675#29
@MaysamAzarbakhsh · 800#30
@kanon_hoghogh_iran · 9,577#31
@IranPostMahsa · 852#32
@vekalat1403mos · 3,238#33
@eestekhdam_com · 695,560#34
@Dadodehesh · 1,997#35
@vokalapress · 29,122#36
@hoghoogh_khososi · 1,997#37
@Azmone_bartar · 20,955#38
@motoon_osool · 11,187#39
@VOICLOW · 2,783#40
@baran_voicelaw_file · 73,898#41
@razazzade_judge · 19,708#42
@newlaw1395 · 687#43
@ebrahimfahimiofficial · 480#44
@kanoonvokalalorestan1 · 1,162#45
@Asia_hoghogh1 · 13,628#46
@Bsansor98 · 4,084#47
@ardabil_az · 184,604#48
@Davtlbfile · 2,746#49
@mfvghafoori · 20,607#50
@motoonghh · 1,185#51
@ArticlesMotaharnia · 16,327#52
@cottageoflaw · 720#53
@dadafarin_news · 14,752#54
@voicelaw5040 · 13,394#55
@LAAWW · 45,598#56
@lexcollege · 39,357#57
@azadlaw · 1,437#58
@publiclawthoughts · 3,362#59
@GuilanBarOriginal · 3,565#60
@vakili_law · 3,768#61
@karoacademy365 · 80,063#62
@kanaletestonokte97 · 15,059#63
@lehrerinzeinabb · 772#64
@mojenoamoozeshgah · 720#65
@vippgolddd · 4,264#66
@FarhangMughan · 908#67
@IauAmozeshyar · 316,683#68
@tadrisekifari · 5,664#69
@inquisitiveCTZN · 3,189#70
@Mohsen_shahmoradi6 · 1,328#71
@arz_jo · 16,630#72
@MehdiMotaharnia1344 · 57,357#73
@testerobinhood · 84,786#74
@mahdaviatsiasi · 167,619#75
@Malitorir · 1,698#76
@Daneshjoo · 359,681#77
@m_Mahdibaba · 138,709#78
@tonight_music · 170 (as read 1 September 2026)#79
@puzzletakxx · 205#80
@ghataghahosseini · 1,890#81
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ghafooriasli · 60,030
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
@lazzatemadani · 66,750
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
@mashahirlawyers · 30,905
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
@drseyedjafari · 58,348
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
@mfvghafoori · 20,607
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 September 2026
@vakilyar1 · 19,338
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 1 October 2026
@mashahiredanesh · 84,161
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
@Law_TesT2 · 63,304
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
@voic_law · 29,691
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
@ekhtebar · 108,760
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
@nedayeqanoon · 41,947
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
@hoghooghitimes · 45,996
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
@testerobinhood · 84,786
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
@LAAWW · 45,598
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
@Azmone_bartar · 20,955
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
@Bisootoonlaw · 117,955
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كانال حقوقی داداِستان⚖” (@mydadestan), 43,300 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mydadestan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.