Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net +494. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,986–28,628 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 12:01
28,554
+21
16 Sept 2026, 05:16
28,533
+8
14 Sept 2026, 14:39
28,525
+28
13 Sept 2026, 03:57
28,497
+31
11 Sept 2026, 05:15
28,466
+5
8 Sept 2026, 09:00
28,461
+25
5 Sept 2026, 03:00
28,436
+14
3 Sept 2026, 08:37
28,422
+22
2 Sept 2026, 03:06
28,400
+13
1 Sept 2026, 04:36
28,387
+25
31 Aug 2026, 04:55
28,362
+8
30 Aug 2026, 05:05
28,354
+15
29 Aug 2026, 02:47
28,339
+7
28 Aug 2026, 00:04
28,332
+11
26 Aug 2026, 20:36
28,321
+19
24 Aug 2026, 21:56
28,302
+29
23 Aug 2026, 11:09
28,273
+27
22 Aug 2026, 00:15
28,246
+9
20 Aug 2026, 15:12
28,237
+10
19 Aug 2026, 13:32
28,227
first reading
Engagement
319 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.40%
avg views ÷ 28,554 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,400
124 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
124
of 319 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 107 of 124 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
319 (4 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
297,442
Reactions total
2,851
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 06:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈13,000
Videos
≈1,360
Links
≈24,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
10m 22s
Average length
1m 09s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,531 reactions across 288 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👎
3,513
53.8%
👍
2,208
33.8%
❤
810
12.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 293 of the 319 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,531 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 319 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌐 بررسی انتقادی و ماده به ماده طرح مقابله با نفوذ بیگانگان
🔹 رئیس کانون وکلای دادگستری هرمزگان در یادداشتی، طرح مقابله با نفوذ بیگانگان را بهصورت مادهبهماده مورد بررسی و نقد حقوقی قرار داد و نسبت به گستردگی برخی تعاریف، الزامات و ضمانتهای اجرایی آن هشدار داده است.
🔹 به گزارش وکلاپرس، وی در این یادداشت با تأکید بر ضرورت مقابله با نفوذ و تهدیدهای خارجی، بر لزوم تفکیک میان «ارتباط با بیگانه» و «وابستگی مجرمانه به …
ویرایش جدید منتشر شد
📘قوانین و مقررات کارشناسی رسمی دادگستری (همراه با تست و پاسخ تشریحی)
📣مجموعه جامع قوانین و مقررات مرتبط به کارشناسی رسمی دادگستری همراه با حاشیه نویسی تخصصی در زیرنویس مواد
📌ویژگی های ویرایش جدید:
◀️ارائه تعرفه جدید دستمزد کارشناسان رسمی دادگستری مصوب سال ۱۴۰۵
◀️شامل سوالات قوانین و مقررات کارشناسی رسمی تا آخرین آزمون برگزار شده دیماه سال ۱۴۰۴
◀️ارائه آخرین نظریات مشورتی و آراء وحدت در حاشیه …
🌐 مصاحبه با کوثر قبادی رتبه اول آزمون اختبار ۱۴۰۵ کانون وکلای دادگستری مازندران
🔹کوثر قبادی، فارغالتحصیل حقوق دانشگاه مازندران، در آزمون وکالت ۱۴۰۲ رتبه ۶۷ کانون وکلای مازندران را کسب کرد و در اختبار سال ۱۴۰۵ این کانون نیز رتبه نخست را به دست آورده است.
🔹او که بیش از ۱۰ سال سابقه تدریس حقوق دارد، موفقیت خود در آزمونها را نتیجه «مطالعه هدفمند، مرور مستمر و استمرار» میداند؛ نه صرفاً ساعت مطالعه بالا یا استفاده از…
✴️ کلیه قوانین و مقررات منبع آزمون در یک کتاب برای نخستین بار منتشر شد
🔸برای نخستین بار کلیه قوانین عام و خاص منبع آزمون وکالت (کانون وکلای دادگستری و مرکز وکلای قوه قضاییه) همراه با زیرنویس تنقیحی و آرای وحدت رویه در یک کتاب منتشر شده است.
🔸کتاب «جامع قوانین و مقررات منبع آزمون وکالت»، ۱۰۰٪ منطبق بر جدیدترین فهرست قوانین و مقررات اعلام شده بعنوان منابع آزمون وکالت (دو نهاد برگزار کننده اسکودا و مرکز وکلای قوه قضائ…
🌐 نقدی بر شرایط اختصاصی کانون وکلای دادگستری مرکز برای آزمون وکالت ۱۴۰۵
🔹 یک وکیل دادگستری در نقد شرایط اختصاصی اعلامشده از سوی کانون وکلای دادگستری مرکز برای آزمون وکالت ۱۴۰۵، نسبت به نحوه اعلام شرط سنی داوطلبان و همچنین ضوابط شرکت مجدد وکلا و کارآموزان در آزمون ابهاماتی را مطرح کرد.
🔹به گزارش وکلاپرس، وکیل صمد زاهدپاشا با استناد به تبصره ماده ۱۵ قانون تشکیل صندوق حمایت وکلا و کارگشایان دادگستری معتقد است ممنوعیت…
🌐 اسکودا و تناقض حمایت از وکلای در معرض خطر؛ از حذف بند «ح» اساسنامه تا بیانیه پنجاه و هفتمین همایش اسکودا
🔹 هیات عمومی اسکودا در پنجاه و هفتمین نشست خود (۲۵ و ۲۶ شهریور ۱۴۰۵، به میزبانی کانون وکلای لرستان) با وجود حذف بند «ح» اساسنامه در مورد حمایت از حقوق صنفی و فردی وکلا، در بیانیهای بر ضرورت صیانت از امنیت حرفهای وکلای دادگستری تأکید کرد و در بند ۴ بیانیه، تدوین قوانین جامع و شفاف برای پیشگیری از تهدید و تعرض …
با مجموعه حاضر علاوه بر پاسخ صحیح، مباحث آموزشی و قوانین را فرا میگیرید
📙حواشی و مستندات آزمون وکالت مرکز وکلای قوه قضاییه (پاسخنامه جامع تشریحی توسط تیم حرفهای و با سابقه همراه با کلیه مستندات مرتبط به پاسخ)
✍️کاری از گروه پژوهش و گردآوری پایگاه خبری اختبار
🔆شامل ۸ آزمون مرکز وکلای قوه قضاییه اخیر
🛒 برای مشاهده و تهیه این کتاب کلیک کنید
dadbazar.com/?p=201288
🔸مروری بر اخبار یکمین روز مهرماه در وکلاپرس
🔗بخشنامه دادگستری تهران برای بهکارگیری سامانه ضمانت الکترونیک در واحدهای قضایی
https://vokalapress.ir/?p=111973
🔗گزارش صورت های مالی سال ۱۴۰۴ کانون وکلای دادگستری کردستان
www.vokalapress.ir/?p=111960
🔗افزایش سقف صلاحیت دعاوی مالی کارآموزان در کانون وکلای کردستان
www.vokalapress.ir/?p=111954
🔗کانون وکلای دادگستری سمنان: «سند ملی ارتقای نهاد وکالت» پایان استقلال است
www…
🌐افزایش سقف صلاحیت دعاوی مالی کارآموزان در کانون وکلای دادگستری کردستان
🔹 در مصوبه جلسه اخیر کانون وکلای دادگستری کردستان آمده است:
پیرو مصوبه پنجاه و هفتمین هیات عمومی کانونهای وکلای دادگستری ایران (اسکودا) هیأت مدیره با اتفاق آرای اعضای حاضر، سقف صلاحیت کارآموزان در دعاوی مالی در کلیه مراجع قضایی شبه قضایی اداری و اجرایی را به صورت انفرادی و مستقل تا مبلغ ۸ میلیارد تومان تعیین نمود همچنین در صورتی که کارآموز به …
🌐 کانون وکلای دادگستری سمنان: «سند ملی ارتقای نهاد وکالت» پایان استقلال است
🔹کانون وکلای سمنان در اعلام موضع نسبت به پیش نویس سند ملی ارتقای نهاد وکالت اعلام کرده است: نمیتوان از یک سو در مقدمه و اهداف سند از استقلال نهاد وکالت سخن گفت و از سوی دیگر ساختارهایی ایجاد کرد که امکان حضور و تأثیرگذاری نهادهای خارج از جامعه وکالت را در اداره و راهبری آن افزایش دهد. استقلال واقعی یعنی جامعه وکالت بتواند امور تخصصی و حرف…
🌐 تمدید مهلت پرداخت مالیات عملکرد سال ۱۴۰۴ صاحبان مشاغل خودرویی در اجرای تبصره ماده (۱۰۰) قانون مالیاتهای مستقیم
🔗 وکلاپرس @vokalapress
▫️وبسایت ▫️ایتا▫️سروش▫️بله▫️اینستاگرام▫️توییتر
🔚
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 319 posts we hold for @vokalapress. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@vokalapress edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
30 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
به نظر شما «برای انحلال آماده شوید» مصداق کدام مورد است؟
تشویش اذهان عمومی36%
تهدید21%
نشر اکاذیب11%
هیچکدام32%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 319 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کانون وکلای مرکز @kanoonevokalamarkaz · 21,343 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 September 2026
حقوق خصوصی @hoghough_khososi · 38,619 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
حقوقی تایمز @hoghooghitimes · 45,491 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
اطلاعات حقوقى و قضايى @hoghooghivaghazaie · 48,783 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
✳️ پایگاه خبری اختبار @ekhtebar · 107,363 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
گروه تخصصی کاربردی وکالت/دادگستریار(ویژه وکلا،کارآموزان) @karaamoz · 21,994 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 September 2026
دوره های کاربردی🎀زری وباران☔️ ۱۴۰۲ @carbordi_karamooz · 39,759 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 30 August 2026
آیین دادرسی مدنی دکتر سیدجعفری @drseyedjafari · 54,840 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
دادگاه مجازی رابین هود @dadgahmajzi · 82,964 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
آرای قضایی @arayeghazayii · 28,601 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
باشگاه وکلای مشاهیر @mashahirlawyers · 31,217 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
فایل حقوقی بیستون @Bisootoonlaw · 115,936 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 August 2026
آرشیو زری و باران حق و عدالت ⚖ @baran_voicelaw_file · 72,219 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
بانک حقوق️ @bankehoghogh · 46,885 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
بانک آرای قضایی @Lawpress_Arayeghazayi · 21,523 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 September 2026
کانال تست رابین هود @testerobinhood · 83,498 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
تدریس رایگان کیفری - احمد غفوری @keyfarighafoori · 38,916 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
آزمون برتر|وکالت،قضاوت @Azmone_bartar · 21,129 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
حقوق آنلاین و جُزوات طلایی🎒⚖️ @LAAWW · 45,587 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
سیویلیکا، مرجع مقالات علمی @civilicacom · 66,882 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
كانال حقوقی داداِستان⚖ @mydadestan · 39,341 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
بانک تست حقوق @Law_TesT2 · 62,500 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
تست آزمونی حُقوق⚖️ @voic_law · 29,421 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
نکات ناب آزمون وکالت @nokatnabvekalat · 42,973 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔵 وکلاپرس” (@vokalapress), 28,554 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vokalapress.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.