Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мудрая птица 🦜

Channel

Мудрая птица 🦜

@mudrayaptitsa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

447subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001737784464
TypeChannel
Username@mudrayaptitsa
Created6 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mudrayaptitsa

Growth

442449445.56 August 2026 — 443 subscribers6 August 2026 — 443 subscribers6 August 2026 — 442 subscribers13 August 2026 — 449 subscribers21 August 2026 — 448 subscribers27 August 2026 — 445 subscribers4 September 2026 — 447 subscribers4476 August 20264 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 29 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 441–450 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 03:00447+2
27 Aug 2026, 22:14445-3
21 Aug 2026, 00:23448-1
13 Aug 2026, 07:34449+7
6 Aug 2026, 20:27442-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:18443no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:17443first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.05%
avg views ÷ 447 subscribers
Avg views / post
36.0
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held14 (3 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total144
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1124.4%
😁715.6%
🙏715.6%
👌511.1%
😭511.1%
48.89%
💯36.67%
🥰24.44%
🤷‍♂12.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC7 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вычитал по случаю в одной южноафриканской газете: Mense sé altyd wanneer iemand sterf is dit soos 'n bibliotek wat afbrand. Говорят, что когда кто-то умирает, это как будто сгорела библиотека

6 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC28 viewsread 6 August 2026

Да, к Ваганову и Криворучко много вопросов. Но это не означает, что надо делать из этого предвыборную историю. Разберутся как-то с ними без Компартии и ЛДПР

6 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC36 viewsread 6 August 2026

Придётся исходит из того, что и Джабо Тедеев и Эдуард Кокойты - люди прошлого, каким бы оно не было. Если говорить о реформации будущего Южной Осетии, то уж точно не от такого прошлого надо отталкиваться

6 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC73 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Итоговый опрос перед диктантом и началом агитационной кампании. За кого Вы будете голосовать на выборах президента РЮО? (в алфавитном порядке)

  1. Мурат Валиев0%
  2. Казбек Кодоев0%
  3. Зуоаб Кокоеа5%
  4. Марат Камболов55%
  5. Хох Чочиев23%
  6. За кого-нибудь18%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC141 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сегодня истекли 40 дней, по истечению которых Зеленский обещал, что Россия на коленяз приползёт. Как-то наоборот случилось

👌3

4 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC232 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⚡️❗️ Занята Бакшеевка Харьковской области. Это продолжение движения после освобождения Белого Колодца

👍4🙏3

4 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC150 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Опять его накрыло

3😁1

4 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC143 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Никогда не говорите от имени "народа". Такого политического или социологического понятия нет. Те, кто часто используют в риторике понятие "народ" или подписывается от имени "народа" - либо популисты, либо провокаторы. Особенно "народ Южной Осетии". Это атомизированная общность, внутри которой разделение может проходить внутри дома. Но прикрываться этим термином уже привыкли многие из недобросовестных политических игр

💯3

4 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC132 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Да-да, я тоже очень хохотался. Но это не ИИ и не монтаж, эта штука реально существует в Москве. Причём недалеко

😁6👌2

4 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTC135 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Irna_ruPhoto

🔻 Багаи: Имеющиеся доказательства свидетельствуют, что удар Украины по иранскому торговому судну был преднамеренным / Иран предпримет все необходимые меры, чтобы привлечь Украину к ответственности Представитель МИД Ирана, отвечая на вопрос о расследовании атаки Украины на иранское торговое судно в российских водах, заявил: Украинские власти — как в ходе прямого разговора с министром иностранных дел Ирана, так и в н

1

4 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC127 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утро! Goeiemôre! Вторник

🥰2👍1🤷‍♂1

3 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC128 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mid_rsoVideo

2 августа в Болонье прошли памятные мероприятия по случаю 46-й годовщины теракта на железнодорожном вокзале. В 1980 году взрыв на станции унёс жизни 85 человек, более 200 получили ранения; это крупнейший теракт в новейшей истории Италии. В память о погибших в теракте 2 августа 1980 года в Италии объявлено Днем памяти жертв всех массовых убийств. В траурной церемонии, как и в предыдущие годы, принимали участие Предст

🙏4👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @mudrayaptitsa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTCAnonymous Poll22 voters

Итоговый опрос перед диктантом и началом агитационной кампании. За кого Вы будете голосовать на выборах президента РЮО? (в алфавитном порядке)

  1. Мурат Валиев0%
  2. Казбек Кодоев0%
  3. Зуоаб Кокоеа5%
  4. Марат Камболов55%
  5. Хох Чочиев23%
  6. За кого-нибудь18%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Контур мира
@KonturMira · 66,252
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мудрая птица 🦜” (@mudrayaptitsa), 447 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mudrayaptitsa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.