International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 44 days, net -419. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,871–28,417 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 03:37
27,934
-15
16 Sept 2026, 19:39
27,949
-16
15 Sept 2026, 01:39
27,965
-25
13 Sept 2026, 09:16
27,990
-12
11 Sept 2026, 14:01
28,002
-5
8 Sept 2026, 23:21
28,007
-34
5 Sept 2026, 13:40
28,041
-18
3 Sept 2026, 12:17
28,059
-3
2 Sept 2026, 09:43
28,062
-4
1 Sept 2026, 11:15
28,066
-1
31 Aug 2026, 11:34
28,067
+5
30 Aug 2026, 13:27
28,062
-8
29 Aug 2026, 12:42
28,070
-8
28 Aug 2026, 13:17
28,078
-14
27 Aug 2026, 10:49
28,092
-9
26 Aug 2026, 12:05
28,101
-10
25 Aug 2026, 08:56
28,111
-26
24 Aug 2026, 08:06
28,137
-21
22 Aug 2026, 18:22
28,158
-6
21 Aug 2026, 11:46
28,164
first reading
Engagement
372 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.30%
avg views ÷ 27,934 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,320
239 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
239
of 372 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 238 of 239 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held
372 (4 August 2026 – 20 September 2026)
Views total
553,830
Reactions total
8,608
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Sept 2026, 08:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈22,800
Videos
≈5,150
Links
≈14,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
39m 10s
Average length
59s
Measured directly from 40 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
15,971 reactions across 364 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
7,363
46.1%
❤
2,680
16.8%
🤬
1,580
9.89%
👏
1,151
7.21%
🔥
923
5.78%
🙏
678
4.25%
😢
434
2.72%
🤣
324
2.03%
😁
229
1.43%
👎
133
0.833%
💔
126
0.789%
🤔
101
0.632%
🤝
74
0.463%
👀
54
0.338%
😱
35
0.219%
🎉
34
0.213%
😍
27
0.169%
🫡
14
0.088%
🤯
11
0.069%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 371 of the 372 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,275 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 372 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚡️ Генерал Шекарчи: инициатива в Ормузском проливе находится в руках Ирана
📌 Иран назвал ложными заявления США о вывозе 1 млрд баррелей нефти из Ормузского пролива
Тегеран, 20 сентября, ИРНА — Инициатива в Ормузском проливе по-прежнему находится в руках мощных вооруженных сил Ирана. Об этом заявил высокопоставленный представитель вооруженных сил Ирана генерал Абульфадл Шекарчи.
«Ложные и смехотворные заявления ко…
🔊 Резаи: Иран полностью готов к решающей войне
📌 Трамп развязал глупую войну и теперь глупо её продолжает, заявил представитель Верховного лидера Ирана
Тегеран, 20 сентября, ИРНА – Иран полностью готов к решающей войне и осведомлен о слабых местах армии США. Об этом заявил в интервью телеканалу "Аль-Джазира" представитель Верховного лидера Ирана и секретарь Высшего совета национальной безопасности Мохсен Резаи.
Н…
📡 Генерал Резаи предупредил США о жестком ответе
📌 Тегеран, 19 сентября, ИРНА - Иран передал через международные посреднические каналы свои официальные условия прекращения военных действий, заявив о готовности к защите и отражению любых потенциальных атак со стороны США. Об этом в интервью телеканалу Al Jazeera заявил генерал-майор Мохсен Резаи.
По словам иранского военачальника, расчеты и оценки американской админ…
📄 В МИД Ирана прокомментировали предстоящий визит главы МВД Пакистана и роль Исламабада
📌 Тегеран, 19 сентября, ИРНА - Предстоящий визит министра внутренних дел Пакистана в Тегеран пройдет в рамках развития двусторонних добрососедских отношений. Об этом заявил официальный представитель МИД Ирана Эсмаил Багаи.
Дипломат уточнил, что в составе пакистанской делегации также ожидает участие представителей экономического …
📡 Участники конференции по миру и справедливости в Лондоне заявили о подрыве международного права из-за действий США и Израиля
📌 Тегеран, 19 сентября, ИРНА - Военная эскалация и удары США по объектам на территории Ирана, а также продолжающиеся боевые действия израильских сил в секторе Газа окончательно сбросили «демократическую маску» с политики современного империализма. Об этом заявили международные спикеры и прав…
🔊 Эксперт заявил, что Вашингтон оставил Саудовскую Аравию один на один с военным потенциалом Йемена
📌 Соединенные Штаты фактически самоустранились от выполнения обязательств по гарантиям безопасности Саудовской Аравии, оставив Королевство в одиночестве перед лицом растущей военной мощи вооруженных сил движения «Ансар Аллах» (хуситы). Об этом в комментарии региональным СМИ заявил арабский политолог и исследователь.
…
🔊 Минобороны РФ отчиталось об уничтожении 1345 украинских военных за сутки вдоль всей линии фронта
📌 Тегеран, 19 сентября, ИРНА - Подразделения Вооруженных сил Украины (ВСУ) за минувшие сутки потеряли порядка 1345 военнослужащих в ходе боестолкновений на ключевых участках линии боевого соприкосновения. Об этом говорится в свежей ежедневной сводке Министерства обороны Российской Федерации.
Согласно данным российског…
🔻 The Washington Post: Реальные потери США в войне против Ирана превышают официальные данные Пентагона
📌 Тегеран, 19 сентября, ИРНА - Реальное число погибших американских военнослужащих в ходе военных действий против Ирана существенно превышает цифры, публично раскрываемые Министерством обороны США. Об этом сообщает газета The Washington Post со ссылкой на заявления шести высокопоставленных американских чиновников.
…
💬 Главы МИД Ирана и Пакистана договорились о встрече на полях Генассамблеи ООН в Нью-Йорке
📌 Тегеран, 19 сентября, ИРНА - Министры иностранных дел Исламской Республики Иран и Исламской Республики Пакистан провели телефонные переговоры, в ходе которых подтвердили курс на углубление двусторонней координации и согласовали проведение личной встречи «на полях» предстоящей сессии Генеральной Ассамблеи ООН в Нью-Йорке. Об …
🔊 Арагчи французскому коллеге: хватит лить крокодиловы слезы!
Министр иностранных дел Исламской Республики Иран Сейед Аббас Арагчи сегодня отреагировал на послание своего французского коллеги Жана-Ноэля Барро. «Полтора миллиона алжирцев были убиты Францией в ходе войны за независимость этой страны. Париж официально зарегистрировал менее десятой части из них, но по-прежнему отказывается от любых извинений за свои кол…
📄 Эксперт заявил о глубоком кризисе Эр-Рияда в Йемене из-за недооценки сил движения «Ансар Аллах»
📌 Тегеран, 19 сентября, ИРНА - Саудовская Аравия оказалась в глубоком реальном кризисе в Йемене из-за ошибочных расчетов и явной недооценки потенциала движения «Ансар Аллах» (хуситы). Об этом в интервью телеканалу Al Ahd заяви́л арабский политический эксперт и исследователь Хасан Алиан.
По словам аналитика, последние д…
💬 В движении «Ансар Аллах» заявили о нормальном судоходстве в Баб-эль-Мандебском проливе для нейтральных судов
📌 Тегеран, 19 сентября, ИРНА - Высокопоставленный представитель йеменского движения «Ансар Аллах» (хуситы) Хизам аль-Асад заявил, что судоходство в Красном море и Баб-эль-Мандебском проливе осуществляется в штатном режиме и без каких-либо препятствий для большинства международных торговых судов.
В интервью…
👍43🤔2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 372 posts we hold for @Irna_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🇮🇷🤝🇷🇺 Сильный Иран @The_beauties_of_Iranii · 50,338 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
Iranist @IRANist1 · 25,340 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
ParsToday Russian 🇮🇷 @parstodayrussian · 29,837 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
Дневник иранского журналиста🇮🇷 @khayalpressa313 · 49,342 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Мечеть Имама(ru.wikipedia.org) “…См. также ==
* [[Площадь Имама]]
== Ссылки и примечания ==
* [https://t.me/Irna_ru/15015 (видео)]
{{примечания}}
{{нет источников|дата=2012-12-09}}…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АГЕНТСТВО IRNA 🇮🇷” (@Irna_ru), 27,934 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Irna_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.