Engagement
16 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 33.5%
- avg views ÷ 1,495 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 501
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
8 Sept 2026, 09:51 UTC238 views0 reactionsread 8 September 2026 Forwarded from @zzclbg
【时间】：2026-09-08
【老师】：子默
【留名】：666
【人照】：9.5
【颜值】：9
【身材】：9
【服务】：8.5
【态度】：10
【环境】：10
【综合】：9.33
【过程】：看到妹妹第一眼就相中了，把其他老师推掉果断约课出击，本人的行动力执行力杠杠的，话不多说，顺利会师，开门一瞬间看到妹妹亭亭玉立的站着，人照高度一致，频道的照片就是在这个教室刚拍的，衣服都一样，穿衣显瘦，脱衣有肉，值得表扬的是妹妹仪容仪表完全不像嫩妹，很端庄大气，说话的方式很独特，挺有磁性的女中音略带沙哑，但是听起来很舒服，后续得知妹妹之前跟过婚庆，原来是练过啊，接下来妹妹略显羞涩的问我，哥哥还可以吗，那一瞬间，心都融了，我觉得没有哪个男人会说No，抽了一支烟，妹妹也慢慢放的开了，她说刚来这我是她见的第一个有点害羞放不开，一听到这，那我可来劲了啊，毕竟第一个吃螃蟹的人心里感觉都不一样，妹妹全程陪浴，洗的很细致，可惜水中萧没有体会到，没有在冲洗的…
8 Sept 2026, 07:34 UTC412 viewsread 8 September 2026 开课可约
8 Sept 2026, 07:02 UTC486 viewsread 8 September 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
8 Sept 2026, 06:56 UTC477 viewsread 8 September 2026 Video
Video, posted without a caption
8 Sept 2026, 06:56 UTC466 viewsread 8 September 2026 喜欢舌钉口不哥哥们
Channel photo updated
8 Sept 2026, 05:40 UTC518 viewsread 8 September 2026 好卡网今天
8 Sept 2026, 04:56 UTC567 viewsread 8 September 2026 长发时候照片
8 Sept 2026, 04:56 UTC568 viewsread 8 September 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
8 Sept 2026, 04:24 UTC592 viewsread 8 September 2026 今天下午开
8 Sept 2026, 04:18 UTC599 views0 reactionsread 8 September 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
8 Sept 2026, 04:18 UTC588 viewsread 8 September 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @nanaxide. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“子默的相册” (@nanaxide), 1,495 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nanaxide.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
