Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for я cissy

Channel

я cissy

@narcissus

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

71,438subscribers

+262 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002773536837
TypeChannel
Username@narcissus
DescriptionАвторский канал про крипту и деньги, и деньги и крипту. У МЕНЯ НЕТ РЕКЛАМНЫХ МЕНЕДЖЕРОВ! Чат: @ochko Я: @narcissist
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/narcissus

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

70,96575,72873,346.57 August 2026 — 71,176 subscribers8 August 2026 — 71,034 subscribers9 August 2026 — 71,095 subscribers10 August 2026 — 73,448 subscribers11 August 2026 — 73,226 subscribers12 August 2026 — 73,092 subscribers13 August 2026 — 72,857 subscribers15 August 2026 — 72,661 subscribers16 August 2026 — 72,381 subscribers17 August 2026 — 72,201 subscribers18 August 2026 — 72,081 subscribers19 August 2026 — 71,966 subscribers20 August 2026 — 71,761 subscribers22 August 2026 — 71,553 subscribers23 August 2026 — 71,318 subscribers25 August 2026 — 71,102 subscribers26 August 2026 — 70,965 subscribers26 August 2026 — 73,525 subscribers27 August 2026 — 75,728 subscribers28 August 2026 — 75,488 subscribers29 August 2026 — 75,201 subscribers30 August 2026 — 74,875 subscribers31 August 2026 — 74,562 subscribers1 September 2026 — 74,374 subscribers2 September 2026 — 74,199 subscribers4 September 2026 — 73,978 subscribers7 September 2026 — 73,348 subscribers10 September 2026 — 72,806 subscribers12 September 2026 — 72,358 subscribers14 September 2026 — 72,092 subscribers16 September 2026 — 71,825 subscribers18 September 2026 — 71,438 subscribers71,4387 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net +262. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 70,251–76,442 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 13:0071,438-387
16 Sept 2026, 02:2071,825-267
14 Sept 2026, 07:1672,092-266
12 Sept 2026, 13:5972,358-448
10 Sept 2026, 09:5772,806-542
7 Sept 2026, 01:5673,348-630
4 Sept 2026, 11:1973,978-221
2 Sept 2026, 19:5674,199-175
1 Sept 2026, 18:3474,374-188
31 Aug 2026, 16:3574,562-313
30 Aug 2026, 16:3974,875-326
29 Aug 2026, 18:3875,201-287
28 Aug 2026, 20:0475,488-240
27 Aug 2026, 22:1275,728+2,203
26 Aug 2026, 23:2573,525+2,560
26 Aug 2026, 01:0770,965-137
25 Aug 2026, 01:2471,102-216
23 Aug 2026, 12:1271,318-235
22 Aug 2026, 00:2371,553-208
20 Aug 2026, 18:0371,761first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 71,438 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,940
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026
Posts held42 (9 July 202617 September 2026)
Views total142,970
Reactions total1,186
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 13:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
274
Videos
8
Links
64

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2,669 reactions across 41 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,49355.9%
custom 591325703263853668240215.1%
custom 591341811968194111935213.2%
custom 591120908915258993230611.5%
custom 5807576660786027702612.29%
custom 5976318967998848132552.06%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,669 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,001
across the posts below
Posts paid on
24
of 41 we hold a reading for · 59%
Most on one post
781
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @narcissus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 17 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Sept 2026, 13:37 UTC≈3,880 views16 reactions3 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

lowkey думаю лучший мем цикла

12custom 59132570326385366824

11 Sept 2026, 09:52 UTC≈7,240 views42 reactions6 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

mistakes were made in a wallet I control.

34custom 59132570326385366828

10 Sept 2026, 11:11 UTC≈6,740 views70 reactionsread 22 September 2026

Увидел там биф какой то у Пера со Смэшем Читать лень, просто захотелось сказать что вы все пидорасы 👍

52custom 59132570326385366829custom 59134181196819411196custom 59112090891525899323

6 Sept 2026, 07:55 UTC≈9,540 views53 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Поэтому я не допустил эту ошибку с $PAIR 🤙

50custom 59132570326385366823

6 Sept 2026, 07:20 UTC≈7,140 views40 reactions2 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Как я случайно рагнул монету на 130кк мкап 😕 Еще один мой фамбл на около 3+ миллионов долларов. Когда начиналась мета мемов в паре с акциями, все происходило только на робинхуд и бнб чейне. Мы нашли лаунчпад который был первым подобным на солане. У них висел мертвый твиттер на сайте и я подумал, что дев просто рагнул и все, но технология работала. Я купил при капе 150к, в чатах начали разгонять тему и я продал в па

custom 591325703263853668224custom 59112090891525899327custom 591341811968194111972

5 Sept 2026, 10:37 UTC≈6,760 views41 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

В очередной раз убеждаюсь: если чуйка говорит «нет», значит нет. Лор: Девушка Илона Маска твитит саппорт к проекту $SLINK, то есть буквально женщина топ-1 чела по моушену в мемкоинах твитит са. Ryan Tanaka, связанный с Neuralink, начинает фадить, говорит, что это, вероятно, взлом. Я не топ бластчу, захожу на неподтвержденном фаде при капе 20-10кк. Внезапно Маск отвечает под ее постом: «💯». Tanaka извиняется за

custom 59134181196819411192510custom 59132570326385366824custom 59112090891525899322

5 Sept 2026, 09:40 UTC≈6,090 views68 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

забыл

56custom 59112090891525899328custom 59134181196819411194

5 Sept 2026, 09:25 UTC≈6,490 views62 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026
Photo

All you need:

60custom 59132570326385366822

4 Sept 2026, 10:25 UTC≈7,670 views123 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

well..

custom 59112090891525899327134custom 591325703263853668216custom 59134181196819411192

31 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC≈10,700 views81 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026
Photo

Поэтому я не раздаю советов.

55custom 591325703263853668217custom 59134181196819411199

30 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC≈9,800 views82 reactions3 Starsread 22 September 2026

В тон коммьюнити 3 тысячи ларп сучек и один серфер. Присмотритесь.

57custom 591120908915258993220custom 59132570326385366825

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @narcissus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“я cissy” (@narcissus), 71,438 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/narcissus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.