Уютный блог репетитора английского 🤎
Пишу об уроках, делюсь полезностями, творю на miro 🪄
По всем вопросам обращайтесь: @nastya_teaches ❤️
Boosty: https://boosty.to/nastya_teach1111111/posts/fdaeac11-5837-4407-b2dc-acb2b41957b7?share=post_link
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net +513. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,804–9,628 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 04:11
9,436
-12
2 Nov 2026, 17:20
9,448
-26
30 Oct 2026, 16:21
9,474
-20
27 Oct 2026, 22:51
9,494
-19
24 Oct 2026, 22:38
9,513
-20
21 Oct 2026, 17:40
9,533
+127
18 Oct 2026, 11:15
9,406
+219
15 Oct 2026, 04:18
9,187
+72
12 Oct 2026, 03:02
9,115
-27
5 Oct 2026, 17:37
9,142
+29
28 Sept 2026, 08:56
9,113
-46
19 Sept 2026, 04:15
9,159
-9
14 Sept 2026, 15:40
9,168
-8
11 Sept 2026, 06:16
9,176
-27
6 Sept 2026, 13:36
9,203
-10
2 Sept 2026, 13:14
9,213
-4
30 Aug 2026, 11:24
9,217
+36
27 Aug 2026, 11:55
9,181
+123
24 Aug 2026, 15:44
9,058
+93
20 Aug 2026, 13:58
8,965
first reading
Engagement
51 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.30%
avg views ÷ 9,436 subscribers
Avg views / post
595
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 51 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
51 (28 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
12,492
Reactions total
413
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 22:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,110
Videos
≈214
Links
≈594
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 01s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
846 reactions across 44 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
279
33.0%
custom 5474387692261234317
100
11.8%
custom 5472020881813304192
86
10.2%
❤🔥
86
10.2%
🔥
64
7.57%
😍
58
6.86%
🥰
30
3.55%
custom 5474525187049276859
22
2.60%
💯
21
2.48%
⚡
19
2.25%
custom 5471920942219283339
16
1.89%
custom 5323768575079508001
13
1.54%
custom 5339392296007790981
13
1.54%
😱
13
1.54%
custom 5238194538572457022
6
0.709%
custom 5323398293064023200
6
0.709%
custom 5312417062415519902
5
0.591%
custom 5310021243758467151
3
0.355%
💔
3
0.355%
💘
3
0.355%
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 846 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 46 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nastyateaches. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (43.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Последняя возможность обсудить тыквенные пироги!
😊дарим вау материалы
🍂Thanksgiving with Gossip Girl (B1+), teens, adults,PDF
- материал по сериалу, warm-up, vocabulary, reading
🎃Thanksgiving Homework (B1+/B2) teens, adults, PDF
- отличный материал для чтения текста дома, а обсуждения на уроке
🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎 в ботике тут 🤍
🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎 🤎
Starlight 6: Language Review Module 2
- делюсь с вами ВОРКБУКОМ из своего Доната (вариант 2)
🍩Продолжение в моём VK Donut 🍩
➡️Подробнее о наполнении Starlight 6 6: https://vk.ru/topic-223296260_68883240?offset=0
Мне кажется такие материалы очень помогают учителям и поэтому стараюсь делиться бесплатно почаще (хоть и не многие преподают по этому учебнику). Поэтому, если кому-то актуально - буду рада вид…
🤑🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🥧
Друзья, мы не могли пропустить эти два события в Ноябре и решили создать классные материалы для вас!
🤎🤎🤎 материалы, которые вам точно понадобятся скоро:
🤩PDF:
🤎The Turkey’s Shopping List — 7–9 лет
🤎Black Friday: Save the Pocket Money — 10–12 лет
🤎Black Friday Speaking Cards — 10–17 лет
🤎Thanks for the Small Things — 12–17 лет
🤎The Buy Button: One Tiny Pancake — 14–18 лет
🤎Thanksgiving with Gossip…
☕️ канал с готовыми уроками для преподавателей
я всегда в поиске интересных уроков, которые не только экономят время на подготовку, но и вдохновляют меня и моих учеников, поэтому сегодня хочу рассказать про закрытый канал Насти, где вы найдёте именно такие материалы🤍
the lesson flow — место, где вы найдёте качественные и эстетично оформленные материалы, которые сократят время подготовки к вашим урокам⤵️
⚫️доступ н…
Друзья, бот не работает… 😢
Ждем, когда снова можно будет поучаствовать..
Рассылку продлю до 2.11🙏🏻
Коллеги, у кого ботик есть - так только у меня или у всех сейчас сбои?
🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎
October 🎃
Друзья, давайте посмотрим, какие полезности были в октябре:
🍁Simon’s Cat Halloween free
🍁Halloween Pack
🍁Halloween warm-ups free
🍁CORALINE Halloween Progressme free
🍁Snoopy Present Perfect A2
🍁Halloween A0-A1 lesson free
🍁Shrek’s Halloween Party free
И не пропустите игры к Halloween:
🤎12 игр ⚪⚪
🤎6 игр 🤩⚪⚪
⚪ Halloween Pack for kids and adults
В этом месяце получилась куча полезностей!
Е…
Добавила урок ⬆️
Тем временем в Кладовой ещё выйдет урок про Паддингтона и скоро будет 100 уроков
Уроки в Кладовой доступны в 3-х ворматах, как этот воркбук и как уроки выше: ⚪⚪⚪
Enjoy!❤️
✉️Связь: @nastya_teaches
🍓🍎🥯🥗❤️⚪⚪⚪
- урок за реакции, который точно вам пригодится!
Шрэк собирается устроить вечеринку к Хэллоуину и ему нужна наша помощь! Обсуждаем household chores и отрабатываем Past Simple, Past Continuous, Past Perfect
Это абсолютно новый урок, который я добавила в свою кладовую материалов, где собрано уже более 80 уроков 🔥
И делюсь бесплатно с вами за 1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ реакций ❤️
🍁🍁Уверена, что мы сможем их собрать 🫙
Спаси…
🤎🤎🤎🤎🤎 для ваших хэллоуинских уроков
нашла несколько прикольных видео и мне показалось, что можно взять некоторые кусочки на уроки!
🤩Snoopy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZuA3YiH7s0
- по этому видео у меня тут прекрасный урок A1-A2
🤩Paddington: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9znxh3U_bw
🤩Tom & Jerry: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HxXuYSK-K4
🐰Max & Ruby: Max's Halloween: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEKeS…
🐱ох уж эта spooky неделя…
Я подготовила для вас несколько активностей, которые вы можете забрать в этом посте 🥹
Это просто подарочек от меня - 6 супер крутых warm-ups и speaking cards🍪
Надеюсь вам понравится! Я старалась🐱 и надеюсь на реакции!
🗂Забрать все активности на диске: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qPKGcKiWPM2XRoPYPuAWDzDrDPTU39PE?usp=sharing
Поставить лайк посту 😻
✨Проголосовать если есть прем…
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @nastyateaches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @nastyateaches as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
7 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Коллеги, вам важен интерактив в моих уроках? На Миро/holst
Да, хочется больше интерактива (перетаскивать, складывать и т.п)64%
Нет, главное наполненность урока, задания36%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Английские полезности @miss_polly_eng · 21,954 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 September 2026
English Grammar Daily @englishgrammartesting · 31,527 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
Анти-учительская @ok_moneymaking · 26,905 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
BOOKSHELF for TEACHERS 📚 @englishteacherbookshelf · 36,985 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
eng books • collection @englishbooks_collection · 72,232 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
Инглекс | Заряжаемся английским @englex_school · 66,282 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
Открытый Английский @open_eng · 23,330 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 September 2026
LinguaTrip @linguatrip_channel · 34,040 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 September 2026
Материалы по английскому @english_materia · 22,903 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
От репетитора к онлайн-школе | Илья Методайзер @methodyzer · 22,850 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
Прорыв в репетиторстве | Елизавета @esvasilevaru · 24,306 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nastya.teaches | Настя учит ☕️” (@nastyateaches), 9,436 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nastyateaches.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.