Дітям в Чернігові не вистачає шкільних обідів, хоча за все сплатила держава та міський бюджет Те, що в Чернігові регулярно обкрадають дітей на харчуванні, відомо давно. КП «Шкільне» на чолі з Віталієм Лосєвим неодноразово ставало фігурантами кримінальних справ, а держаудитори викривали численні крадіжки. Але, Лосєв на посаді, в мерії його роботою задоволені, а правоохоронці так нічого і не довели до суду. Сьогодні ж…

Channel
Новини Чернігівщини
@newchnews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,412subscribers
+76 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001455951263 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @newchnews |
| Created | 29 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/newchnews |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 13:16 | 25,412 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 13:59 | 25,415 | -1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:11 | 25,416 | -2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 20:11 | 25,418 | -3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 17:55 | 25,421 | -9 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 17:20 | 25,430 | +2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 25,428 | +17 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:41 | 25,411 | +54 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:38 | 25,357 | -10 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 25,367 | -10 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:36 | 25,377 | -8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:30 | 25,385 | -10 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:39 | 25,395 | +25 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:25 | 25,370 | -6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:26 | 25,376 | +14 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 22:39 | 25,362 | +8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:37 | 25,354 | +3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:19 | 25,351 | +33 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:19 | 25,318 | +3 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 25,315 | first reading |
Engagement
955 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 134 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 28.3%
- avg views ÷ 25,412 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,200
- 344 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 344
- of 955 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 955 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,477,987 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 09:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3h 29m
- Average length
- 1m 20s
Measured directly from 157 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 344 posts held from the last 30 days (1.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
❗️рф вдарила по підстанціях, які зʼєднують Рівненську та Хмельницьку АЕС із Києвом та центральними регіонами України, – Зеленський.
Цієї ночі війська РФ запустили по Україні ракети Іскандер-М/Циркон/KN-23/С-400 та 172 ударні дрони. ППО знешкодила чотири ракети та 149 безпілотників, повідомили у Повітряних силах. Влучання ракет та БпЛА зафіксували на 24 локаціях, у десяти місцях впали уламки.
✅Ще 10 БпЛА від Ніжинської громади - для ефективної боротьби з ворогом. "Передали обладнання військовослужбовцям 158-ї окремої механізованої бригади, які боронять кордони на одному з напрямків. Хлопці дякують нам за підтримку, а ми їм - за захист," - зазначив мер Ніжина Олександр Кодола. Відзнака від командира бригади, яку отримали від військових, - це подяка всій громаді та кожному платнику податків за внесок у сп…
🔺️️️️️️Унаслідок атаки росіян пошкоджено об’єкт електропостачання. Усього знеструмлені близько 150 тисяч абонентів у Корюківському і Чернігівському районах, а також у містах Чернігів і Славутич. Енергетики частково заживили абонентів, роботи з відновлення електропостачання тривають. За інформацією АТ «Чернігівобленерго».
‼️Чернігів повністю залишився без електропостачання! Наразі енергетики вже розпочали поступове відновлення живлення. У частині міста світло вже з’явилося. 🚎 Через відсутність електроенергії рух тролейбусів у Чернігові тимчасово призупинено. Про подальші зміни повідомлятимемо.
🤯 Кілька ракет влучили в Північний міст у Києві, — Кличко Унаслідок удару пошкоджені дорожнє покриття, контактна тролейбусна мережа та лінія електропередач. Також вибуховою хвилею на парковці поблизу мосту пошкодило п’ять вантажівок. Наразі на місці вже працюють дорожні та комунальні служби.
❗️Балістика на Київ. Можете чути конус маха
🪵 Теплі уроки замість замерзлих кабінетів: лісівники забезпечили дровами школу на Чернігівщині У Сергіївській загальноосвітній школі на Чернігівщині навчається 72 учні. Заняття проходять у чотирьох окремих корпусних приміщеннях, які опалює одна спільна котельня. Щоб учні не замерзали під час морозів, а навчальний процес не переривався, закладу потрібен був значний запас якісного палива. "Питання вирішили заздалегід…
🚔 У Чернігові у водія Tesla виявили 130 літрів спирту На вулиці Михалевича патрульні зупинили Tesla Model 3 під керуванням 42-річного чоловіка. Під час перевірки в багажниках авто знайшли 11 десятилітрових пляшок та 20-літрову каністру з рідиною із запахом спирту. Водій пояснив, що придбав її для власного вживання. На місце викликали слідчо-оперативну групу, яка з’ясовуватиме походження спирту.
❗️Студенти віком 25+, увага: нові перевірки будуть в українських університетах уже у січні, — глава Державної служби якості освіти Руслан Гурак. Причина — кількість таких студентів зросла у 7 разів через відстрочку від мобілізації.
Чернігівська влада продовжує тиснути на місцевий бізнес, вимагаючи демонтувати літні майданчики та рекламні вивіски, які допомагають підприємцям виживати у надскладний для них час. 5 листопада виконавчий комітет Чернігівської міської ради під головуванням заступника міського голови Віктора Геращенка ухвалив рішення про демонтаж ще 27 тимчасових об’єктів у місті. Під приціл чиновників потрапили вивіски, рекламні конст…
Showing the 12 most recent of 955 posts we hold for @newchnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @newchnews as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 1 October 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 1 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 15 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@newchnews named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 10 posts, 8 August 2026 – 16 October 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@suspilnechernihiv · 194,660#1
@chernigiv_truexa · 165,212#2
@lovechernihiv · 51,971#3
@ChernigivOperative · 60,104#4
@CheLineTv · 11,397#5
@lomako_oleksandr · 3,274#6
@h_chernihiv · 36,008#7
@chernigivskaODA · 34,225#8
@politicompr · 2,928#9
@gunpChernihiv · 2,433#10
@truexanewsua · 3,168,865#11
@xchernihiv · 3,731#12
@typical_chernigiv · 14,416#13
@bryzynskyi · 5,319#14
@semargl_chernigiv · 556#15
@eRadarrua · 411,584#16
@voynareal · 1,543,435#17
@chernihiv_fontan · 3,729#18
@ok_pivnich1 · 9,624#19
@tryvoga_chomu · 272,903#20
@newch_tv · 1,395#21
@chernihivpatrolpolice · 1,202#22
@chernihivnewshub · 3,677#23
@chernihivrada · 3,936#24
@tch_channel · 730,911#25
@blaushmedia · 2,746#26
@totallzrada · 267,235#27
@plitki_v_nizhyni · 20,068#28
@gord_new · 7,656#29
@gorodcnua · 2,065#30
@kyivtv · 10,522#31
@gazetadp · 333#32
@smolii_ukraine · 523,822#33
@signal_ukraine · 9,878#34
@taktychna_rukavuchkaa · 46,879#35
@nizhyn_zahist · 9,514#36
@Balsanka_News · 2,856#37
@debaty_sumy_ua · 3,811#38
@dytynetsTV · 1,314#39
@nezhatin · 8,537#40
@pryluky_ua · 1,950#41
@pryluky_operative · 29,888#42
@weukrainetv_ex · 1,558#43
@tgsn_ua · 1,100,884#44
@horodnia · 2,742#45
@CHERNIHIV_ANONIMNO · 266#46
@suspilnesumy · 140,527#47
@uanova · 542,248#48
@dobrogovechorachernigiv · 1,473#49
@atroshenkovladislav · 1,117#50
@partizanyofkrk · 5,984#51
@info_nizhyn · 22,774#52
@rivne_media · 2,329#53
@nizhyn_post · 4,446#54
@chernihiv_insider · 23,217#55
@spravzhniychernihiv · 107#56
@chernihiv_info · 1,432#57
@censor_net · 185,211#58
@police_polt_obl · 3,589#59
@truexachernigov · 3,940#60
@koryukivka_rva · 1,975#61
@vinnpol · 4,605#62
@lachentyt · 1,580,678#63
@insiderukr · 2,154,560#64
@kpszsu · 940,735#65
@war_monitor · 959,985#66
@oko_ua · 670#67
@povitryanatrivogaaa · 730,477#68
@alarmua · 941,878#69
@UaOnlii · 1,541,010#70
@batalionmonako · 712#71
@suspilnenews · 262,599#72
@ratsukraine · 340#73
@chernihivchm · 420#74
@obmenka_chernihiv · 2,447#75
@kyivoperat · 338,386#76
@Hajun_BY · 222,693#77
@nizhyn_operatively · 19,117#78
@oleksiihoncharenko · 208,487#79
@DSNS_Zhytomyr · 1,777#80
@SBUkr · 294,155#81
@dsns_sumy · 5,600#82
@gunpKyiv · 8,393#83
@hryvkoonline · 739#84
@babel · 77,824#85
@zt_police · 2,144#86
@uhmc1921 · 6,335#87
@VA_Kyiv · 54,560#88
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@chernihiv_insider · 23,217
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 September 2026
@ChernigivOperative · 60,104
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
@h_chernihiv · 36,008
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 4 September 2026
@lovechernihiv · 51,971
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
@plitki_v_nizhyni · 20,068
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 September 2026
@chernigiv_truexa · 165,212
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
@suspilnechernihiv · 194,660
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
@chernigivskaODA · 34,225
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@nizhyn_operatively · 19,117
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 3 October 2026
@info_nizhyn · 22,774
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 September 2026
@pryluky_operative · 29,888
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 September 2026
@taktychna_rukavuchkaa · 46,879
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Новини Чернігівщини” (@newchnews), 25,412 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newchnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.