Channel
@newwayofedu
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,661subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001438406622 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @newwayofedu |
| Created | 18 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/newwayofedu |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 1,661 | +2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:55 | 1,659 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 1,662 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 1,663 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 1,668 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 1,670 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 1,673 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 1,676 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 1,677 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 1,677 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 19 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
38 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 17 | 44.7% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 34.2% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 7.89% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2024 to 30 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Дорогие коллеги! В последний понедельник года мы поздравляем вас наступающим 2025 г. и благодарим за то, что этот год вы провели с нами! За этот год: 🎉опубликовано около 170 постов по теме образования 🎉нас стало на 400 человек больше 🎉поставлено множество лайков и начато несколько важных дискуссий в комментариях 🎉введены новые рубрики о понятиях современного образования, об особенностях пилотного проекта и др. Мы …
❤6
Искусственный интеллект в помощь преподавателю В наших последних постах мы нередко затрагивали тему ИИ, его легализации в вузах, способах использования в образовательном процессе разными его участниками. Сегодня хотим поделиться результатами аналитики сотрудников Высшей школы менеджмента СПбГУ. Они изучили, как можно применять нейросети при выполнении преподавательских функций. Авторы сначала изучили ИИ-сервисы, пр…
👍6⚡2
Глава Минобрнауки Валерий Фальков дал интервью по итогам 2024 года и планам в сфере высшего образования и науки на 2025 год 📚Завершился нацпроект «Наука и университеты». Но работа по привлечению молодежи в науку, созданию тесной связки университетов, научных институтов с предприятиями реального сектора экономики – продолжится в рамках новых нацпроектов. 📚В стране открыто 940 молодежных лабораторий. До 2030 года их …
Глоссарий образования ✨ По результатам голосования, побеждает пиринговое обучение, или Peer learning, или peer-to-peer-обучение, P2P-обучение. За всеми этими наименованиями кроется метод, при котором люди обучаются друг у друга. Важным критерием здесь является равенство участников, т.е. обмен опытом, знаниями, информацией происходит в формате «равный-равному». При этом преподаватель не исключается из такого обучени…
❤2❤🔥1👍1
О чем поговорим?
The shares total 136%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤔3
Глоссарий образования снова на связи 📖✨ Предлагаем вам проголосовать за термины из сферы современного неформального образования, которое сильно обогощает подходы формального. Вы голосуете, мы – расскажем о самом популярном термине. #глоссарийобразования Образование по-другому -> @newwayofedu
❤1
Мобильность и международное сотрудничество В рамках пилотного проекта по трансформации высшего образования сохранение и преувеличение академической мобильности студентов и научных сотрудников – один из приоритетов. Вузы продолжают развивать такие направления как стажировки, участие в научно-практических конференциях, программы обмена. 2–4 декабря делегация Санкт-Петербургского горного университета приняла участие в…
Профессии будущего – сбудется или не сбудется? Современное образование уже не может ориентироваться только на опыт прошлого и состояние «здесь и сейчас». Темпы жизни такие быстрые, что учебным заведениям нужно готовить без преувеличения специалистов будущего. А какие профессии будут востребованы через 5-10 лет? И возможно ли вообще это спрогнозировать? Авторы обновленной версии «Атласа новых профессий 3.0» изложили…
❤1
Нынешних студентов меньше волнует стипендия, а больше — будущая карьера. Об этом говорит анализ университетских пабликов в соцсетях. Данные, полученные благодаря цифровым следам, позволят разработать рекомендации в рамках трансформации высшего образования в России Томский государственный университет, ВЦИОМ и платформа «Неравнодушный человек» по цифровым следам и соцопросам выяснили отношение студентов к альма-матер,…
❤3👍1
Новая модель подготовки специалистов для рынка труда подразумевает активное вовлечение в образовательный процесс работодателей Исследования ключевых онлайн-платформ по поиску работы показывают, что работодатели уже сейчас готовы брать на работу специалистов без опыта, а также студентов на стажировки. Конечно, во многом на ситуацию повлиял усиливающийся кадровый голод. При этом полноценно обучать на своих ресурсах к…
⚡1
Продолжаем тему исследований от СберУниверситета в карточках В прошлый раз мы осветили тему трендов по результатам исследования Открытого университета Великобритании. А сегодня поговорим про топ-5 трендов глазами преподавателей. В исследовании «Большая перемена» СберУниверситет изучил мнение группы людей, которые способны определять изменения в российском образовании, — преподавателей российских вузов. Анализ от…
👍5
Делимся постом коллег – от лица представителя бизнеса о том, как они видят взаимодействие с университетами и свои задачи в этой работе
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @newwayofedu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
О чем поговорим?
The shares total 136%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2024 to 30 December 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Образование по-другому” (@newwayofedu), 1,661 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newwayofedu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.