Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Nikita Pinchuk professional channel: IT / EA / BA / Architecture

Channel

Nikita Pinchuk professional channel: IT / EA / BA / Architecture

@nikitapinchuk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

555subscribers

+21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001261052068
TypeChannel
Username@nikitapinchuk
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nikitapinchuk

Growth

534557545.57 August 2026 — 534 subscribers8 August 2026 — 534 subscribers15 August 2026 — 552 subscribers22 August 2026 — 554 subscribers30 August 2026 — 557 subscribers8 September 2026 — 555 subscribers5557 August 20268 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 531–560 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 20:59555-2
30 Aug 2026, 00:57557+3
22 Aug 2026, 07:55554+2
15 Aug 2026, 20:13552+18
8 Aug 2026, 03:49534no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:33534first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

64 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2437.5%
1828.1%
👍1320.3%
👏57.81%
23.13%
❤‍🔥11.56%
🎉11.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC88 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @emacsway_log

Полистал книгу "Методы проектирования летательных аппаратов" (2011) Тарасов Е.В., Балык В.М. https://t.me/aviationlibrary_vk/2996?single И нахожу её довольно интересной для ИТ-архитекторов. 1. Они правильно определяют цель проектной работы - не создание решения, как полагают многие новички, а "нахождение допустимых проектных решений и их оптимизацию." ... "Для ЛА это означает, что по всем его подсистемам, по всем е

👍4🔥32

14 May 2026, 20:36 UTC673 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Заметка для себя, может кому то полезно будет. Ну и Чтоб потом мне самому не забыть как делал😂 Попросили как то посмотреть как дела в одной молодой компании, куда идет, как строит целеполагание, какое видение и пр. После ряда встреч представителями менеджмента - понял что не хватает - не плана. Не хватает - системы работы с гипотезами и принятия решений куда инвестировать ресурсы (время , люди, деньги и пр.). Это н

🔥722

10 Feb 2026, 08:23 UTC702 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Dynamic Systems Thinking is an approach to analyzing complex situations that treats objects not as isolated elements, but as interconnected parts of a system that evolves over time and continuously interacts with itself. Unlike classical analytical thinking, which breaks problems into separate components, Dynamic Systems Thinking focuses on relationships, feedback loops, and how changes in one part of the system aff

🔥32❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nikitapinchuk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nikita Pinchuk professional channel: IT / EA / BA / Architecture” (@nikitapinchuk), 555 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nikitapinchuk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.