Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for #НЕРАК // ОнкоПротект

Channel

#НЕРАК // ОнкоПротект

@no_onco

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18,880subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002080804522
TypeChannel
Username@no_onco
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/no_onco

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

18,75519,35619,055.57 August 2026 — 18,863 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,863 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,795 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,755 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,821 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,862 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,873 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,964 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,968 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,900 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,923 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,984 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,008 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,054 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,085 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,996 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,101 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,140 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,196 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,181 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,203 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,126 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,127 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,184 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,171 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,284 subscribers5 September 2026 — 19,259 subscribers8 September 2026 — 19,277 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,356 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,235 subscribers14 September 2026 — 19,144 subscribers17 September 2026 — 19,024 subscribers19 September 2026 — 18,880 subscribers18,8807 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,665–19,446 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 10:2018,880-144
17 Sept 2026, 00:1719,024-120
14 Sept 2026, 22:1819,144-91
13 Sept 2026, 09:3919,235-121
11 Sept 2026, 09:3619,356+79
8 Sept 2026, 15:5819,277+18
5 Sept 2026, 09:1719,259-25
3 Sept 2026, 09:5719,284+113
2 Sept 2026, 04:2619,171-13
1 Sept 2026, 05:2619,184+57
31 Aug 2026, 06:5619,127+1
30 Aug 2026, 04:0819,126-77
29 Aug 2026, 02:2419,203+22
28 Aug 2026, 00:3619,181-15
27 Aug 2026, 02:1219,196+56
26 Aug 2026, 00:0219,140+39
25 Aug 2026, 00:1119,101+105
23 Aug 2026, 13:1218,996-89
22 Aug 2026, 00:2919,085+31
20 Aug 2026, 21:2619,054first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.41%
avg views ÷ 18,880 subscribers
Avg views / post
267
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.441%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held48 (27 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total3,999
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 45s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

18 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
633.3%
👍527.8%
👌211.1%
🔥211.1%
💘15.56%
🤔15.56%
🤡15.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 16:08 UTC137 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @htech_plusPhoto

Ученые выяснили, как меланома подавляет естественную защиту кожи Меланома способна менять работу здоровых клеток, которые находятся рядом с опухолью. Исследователи выяснили, что клетки меланомы передают кератиноцитам молекулярный сигнал, который подавляет выработку защитного вещества LL-37. В результате опухоль отключает один из механизмов, способных сдерживать ее развитие. https://hightech.plus/2026/09/02/uchenie-

1 Sept 2026, 15:33 UTC238 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @htech_plusVideo

Британские хирурги впервые в истории удалили опухоль мозга, используя систему искусственного интеллекта. Алгоритм определял критические важные структуры, предупреждая о них врачей во время операции. Технология помогла сохранить зрение 48-летнему пациенту. Новообразование, влиявшее на зрительные центры, удалось успешно вырезать, не повредив здоровые ткани.

31 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC312 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @htech_plusPhoto

Ученые нашли признаки квантовой природы рака Рак может быть устроен гораздо проще, чем предполагает огромное количество его мутаций. Исследователи обнаружили, что клетки опухоли способны находиться лишь в ограниченном числе устойчивых состояний, причем одинаковые состояния сохраняются у разных пациентов. Это привело ученых к идее «квантовой природы» рака, которая в будущем может изменить принцип подбора противоопухо

🤡1

31 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC220 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @murashko_medVideo

❗ Министр здравоохранения США Роберт Кеннеди-младший заявил о резком росте заболеваемости раком среди молодёжи. В интервью Fox News он назвал ситуацию «взрывным ростом», особенно отметив саркомы мягких тканей и колоректальный рак, который, по его словам, «был практически неизвестен у детей в предыдущих поколениях, а теперь встречается часто». Цифры подтверждают: за 2013–2022 годы заболеваемость колоректальным раком

👌1

29 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC267 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @murashko_med

💉 Осенью 2026 года двенадцать онкопациентов первыми получат персонализированные мРНК-вакцины от НИЦЭМ имени Гамалеи. Препараты уже синтезированы и вскоре поступят в институт Герцена для введения. По словам Александра Гинцбурга, до конца года планируется провакцинировать как минимум 20 человек — 12 из них готовы полностью. «Мы должны совместно с институтом Герцена провакцинировать еще минимум 20 человек до конца года,

1

29 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC209 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @murashko_medPhoto

✅ 29 августа отмечается День долголетия. Дата выбрана не случайно: в этот день в 2001 году учёные обнаружили первый «ген долголетия». С тех пор их найдены сотни. Но главное открытие этого года — в другом. В журнале Nature вышло исследование: у людей, перешагнувших 110-летний рубеж, в крови значительно больше редких иммунных клеток — цитотоксических Т-лимфоцитов CD4. Они способны распознавать и уничтожать раковые кле

27 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC290 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @htech_plusPhoto

мРНК-терапия уничтожила агрессивный рак поджелудочной железы у половины мышей Экспериментальная мРНК-иммунотерапия показала необычно сильный результат в доклинических экспериментах против одного из самых агрессивных типов рака. У половины мышей опухоли полностью исчезли, а эффект сохранялся еще год после окончания лечения — этот результат поразил исследователей. https://hightech.plus/2026/08/27/mrnk-terapiya-unicht

27 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC316 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @murashko_medPhoto

✅ 27 августа 1942 года врачи Йельского университета впервые применили внутривенную химиотерапию для лечения рака. Лекарство «Субстанция X» — азотистый аналог иприта, боевого отравляющего вещества, которое в Первую мировую снижало лейкоциты у солдат. Это натолкнуло на мысль: если оно действует на быстро делящиеся клетки крови, возможно, поможет и при лимфоме. Первым пациентом стал 47-летний рабочий J.D. с лимфосарком

26 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC352 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @murashko_med

При подозрении или подтверждении онкологии государство гарантирует бесплатную помощь по ОМС в строго определённые сроки. Если вы сталкиваетесь с задержками, на картинках пошаговая инструкция, как действовать. Не стесняйтесь отстаивать свои права — в онкологии счет часто идет на дни, и закон на вашей стороне. Ведущий агрегатор по медицине 🚑 Подпишись в Телеграмм или в МАХ

👍1🤔1

26 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC210 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🍔 Ультрапереработанная еда повышает риск рака простаты на треть: результаты крупного исследования Любите сосиски, газировку, чипсы и полуфабрикаты? Новое исследование, опубликованное в The American Journal of Medicine, https://www.healthday.com/healthpro-news/cancer/risk-for-prostate-cancer-elevated-with-higher-ultraprocessed-food-intake , дает веский повод пересмотреть рацион. Ученые из Атлантического университета Ф

👌1

25 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC289 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @murashko_medPhoto

Медики спасли 61-летнего фермера, у которого после операции на сердце исчезли метастазы меланомы, но спустя два года развилась смертельная аллергия на пчелиный яд. Всю жизнь мужчину жалили пчёлы без последствий, но после вмешательства иммунитет «перезагрузился» и атаковал не только рак, но и начал ошибочно реагировать на безвредный яд. Врачи объясняют: операция по замене клапана и шунтированию вызвала мощную активац

25 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC204 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @htech_plusPhoto

Полоскание рта может точно определять признаки рака желудка и кишечника Простое полоскание рта может стать основой неинвазивного теста для выявления рака желудка и кишечника. Исследователи обнаружили, что состав бактерий во рту связан с опухолями этих органов, причем анализ образца из полости рта оказался чувствительнее стандартного анализа кала на скрытую кровь. https://hightech.plus/2026/08/24/poloskanie-rta-mozh

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @no_onco. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“#НЕРАК // ОнкоПротект” (@no_onco), 18,880 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/no_onco.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.