Channel
@ns_stenina
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
771subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002410768732 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ns_stenina |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ns_stenina |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 771 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 772 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 770 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 770 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
207 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 | 47 | 22.7% | |
| 🔥 | 41 | 19.8% | |
| 🤣 | 36 | 17.4% | |
| ❤ | 31 | 15.0% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 10.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 18 | 8.70% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 4.35% | |
| 😨 | 3 | 1.45% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.483% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔞А если ещё нагляднее и горячее: Я понимаю желание получить всё и бесплатно. Но некоторые такие руководители напоминают мне один узнаваемый мужской типаж. Тот самый, что ищет женщину, которая ну очень сильно любит секс, и которой не так уж важны забота, подарки и всё такое. Но в его фантазии он будет лежать кверху пузом, а секс будет происходить строго по его указке. Шевелиться не надо. Знать анатомию, учиться, экс…
🔥12👏7🏆4🤣4❤🔥3
Вам не нужны немеркантильные сотрудники 😱 Текст для руководителей/владельцев бизнеса. Недавно на собрании наш руководитель реализации ярко донёс мысль, сухой остаток которой: Люди, которые работают не за деньги, для бизнеса скорее опасны. Не✨й с такими работать. Потом была шутка про меня — мол, этой нам достаточно, ха-ха Полностью соглашусь с этим утверждением. Многие руководители вожделеют заполучить в команду пе…
💯9❤5🔥3🏆2
О! Я же могу просто кинуть пачку ворованных собранных за последнее время мемсов в обед понедельника 😃 И вы можете сделать тоже самое в комментарии, пожалуйста. Дайте мне все, что вас разматывало последнее время.
🤣14❤9❤🔥6👏1😈1
ОЧЕНЬ ВАЖНОЕ ОБЪЯВЛЕНИЕ Мы с Денисом набираем людей в команду на квиз по вселенной Warhammer! 29 августа, Москва, бар 4brewers, мероприятие длится с 14:00 до полуночи, квизы ближе к вечеру, команда уже зарегистрирована 🥴 Ну вот совершенно случайно, вдруг на меня подписана парочка очень уважаемых знатоков из Москвы? Давайте предварительно познакомимся (ну немножко) и пошли веселиться. Напишите в личку на @n_stenina…
🏆9
Я всех-всех-всех потрогала. Ну, кроме сильно ядовитых. Гигантский кузнечик правда попытался откусить мне палец (и почти справился! Ни😬ровые у них челюсти! Прокусывает лучше офисной хомячихи!). А все остальные были вполне дружелюбны и тактильны. Провела воскресенье, получается, в очень расслабляющей компании 🕸
❤12❤🔥8🏆4🔥3😨3
🥰🥰🥰
🔥8🏆6
☕🍾 Газированный кофе от Egoiste сейчас окунул меня в ностальгию. Не рекламная интеграция, к сожалению, но история: Я изобрела газированный кофе до того, как это стало мейнстримом! Вышла первый день я на работу в A(а-апчхи!)r, и меня знакомили с местными достопримечательностями (кухней). Там был какой-то шикарный кулер. Кофемашина, конечно, тоже была — ещё бы, этаж для руководителей всё-таки, роскошь чувствовалась во…
🤣18🏆7🔥5❤2
Давайте я что-то околоумное напишу потом, а сегодня вспомню, как же прикольно было попеть на настоящей сцене с группой 😍 Оказалось, это вовсе не смертельно, даже если только учишься. Хорошие фотки. Ещё хочу (и фоток, и попеть).
🏆15👏13🔥10❤3❤🔥1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ns_stenina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Осознанная Некомпетентность 🤸🏼♀️” (@ns_stenina), 771 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ns_stenina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.