Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Тупые депрессивные мемы

Channel

Тупые депрессивные мемы

@tdmem

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,327subscribers

-472 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001956372442
TypeChannel
Username@tdmem
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tdmem

Growth

25,32725,79925,5637 August 2026 — 25,799 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,785 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,769 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,743 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,733 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,718 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,700 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,664 subscribers15 August 2026 — 25,638 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,612 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,590 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,576 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,549 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,520 subscribers23 August 2026 — 25,480 subscribers24 August 2026 — 25,434 subscribers25 August 2026 — 25,411 subscribers27 August 2026 — 25,385 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,362 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,341 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,327 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 23 days, net -472. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,256–25,870 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 02:5325,327-14
29 Aug 2026, 03:5225,341-21
28 Aug 2026, 02:1225,362-23
27 Aug 2026, 01:1225,385-26
25 Aug 2026, 22:5725,411-23
24 Aug 2026, 20:1525,434-46
23 Aug 2026, 04:1825,480-40
21 Aug 2026, 16:0525,520-29
20 Aug 2026, 11:2525,549-27
19 Aug 2026, 07:5225,576-14
18 Aug 2026, 07:0325,590-22
17 Aug 2026, 09:5625,612-26
15 Aug 2026, 20:2625,638-26
14 Aug 2026, 13:4425,664-36
13 Aug 2026, 03:5725,700-18
12 Aug 2026, 06:4225,718-15
11 Aug 2026, 08:0625,733-10
10 Aug 2026, 11:2325,743-26
9 Aug 2026, 10:5125,769-16
8 Aug 2026, 09:3525,785first reading

Engagement

74 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.17%
avg views ÷ 25,327 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,560
74 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
74
of 74 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held74 (1 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total115,686
Reactions total5,981
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 21:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

5,981 reactions across 74 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,00867.0%
😭1,72228.8%
💔2514.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 74 of the 74 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,981reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC740 views49 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭2219💔8

27 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC954 views59 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭3918💔2

26 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC≈1,060 views99 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭5633💔10

26 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,090 views61 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

34💔15😭12

26 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC≈1,150 views55 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

48😭7

26 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC≈1,170 views77 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

63😭14

25 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC≈1,180 views59 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

44😭8💔7

25 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC≈1,270 views92 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

84😭8

24 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,300 views75 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

64😭11

Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @tdmem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 663,660 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Психология простым языком
@psihologiyaaaaaa0 · 61,952
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
ЖИЗА | КОМИКСЫ
@jizajz · 125,608
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 13 August 2026
Твиттерок
@twitter_ok · 69,307
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
взрослая жизнь
@vzroslyaa · 122,621
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 August 2026
Познавариум
@poznavarium_ru · 62,578
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
Девичник 💍
@girl_humor · 54,901
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
Я что, психолог?
@yapsihologya · 81,233
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
Лексикона | Образование
@lexicona · 286,415
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
художка
@risovanie_referensy · 67,969
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 20 August 2026
date ideas|психология отношений
@dateideasspp · 46,767
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026
никому не рассказывай
@usveex · 50,869
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
Не перепутай!
@nepereputai · 89,319
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026
Карамба! • мемы приколы
@aaakaramba · 58,685
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 August 2026
не вешай носик котёночек
@meow_meow_cute · 116,367
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
Ору, мисс!
@miss_oru · 64,368
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тупые депрессивные мемы” (@tdmem), 25,327 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tdmem.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.