Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ОБОЖАБА

Channel

ОБОЖАБА

@obozhaba

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,276subscribers

-236 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001501732115
TypeChannel
Username@obozhaba
DescriptionЯ вас обожаба! По личным вопросам и предложениям писать ➡️ t.me/obozhaba_bot
Created25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/obozhaba

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,2768,5148,3956 August 2026 — 8,512 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,512 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,511 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,514 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,508 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,498 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,495 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,482 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,471 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,463 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,455 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,453 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,436 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,430 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,390 subscribers1 October 2026 — 8,359 subscribers8 October 2026 — 8,345 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,327 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,310 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,309 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,306 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,298 subscribers28 October 2026 — 8,293 subscribers31 October 2026 — 8,286 subscribers6 November 2026 — 8,276 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 92 days, net -236. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,240–8,550 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 12:108,276-10
31 Oct 2026, 13:318,286-7
28 Oct 2026, 09:068,293-5
25 Oct 2026, 16:358,298-8
23 Oct 2026, 02:298,306-3
20 Oct 2026, 00:378,309-1
17 Oct 2026, 02:398,310-17
13 Oct 2026, 20:498,327-18
8 Oct 2026, 10:398,345-14
1 Oct 2026, 18:558,359-31
16 Sept 2026, 03:418,390-40
12 Sept 2026, 09:418,430-6
8 Sept 2026, 12:158,436-17
2 Sept 2026, 23:578,453-2
31 Aug 2026, 05:258,455-8
28 Aug 2026, 11:158,463-8
25 Aug 2026, 03:348,471-11
22 Aug 2026, 00:458,482-13
18 Aug 2026, 10:488,495-3
15 Aug 2026, 15:238,498first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 5 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.3%
avg views ÷ 8,276 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,090
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held25 (5 March 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total6,174
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 23:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,490
Videos
≈727
Links
≈230

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 47s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 06:55 UTC934 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @tvrkmprPhoto

Мое лицо, когда мамина подруга похвалила за столом:

12 Oct 2026, 11:21 UTC≈5,240 viewsread 6 November 2026
Video

Все мы немного мачеха. Особенно в понедельник. 😂

3 Oct 2026, 07:36 UTC≈3,210 viewsread 6 November 2026
Video

Все мы немного она в субботу утром 😂

26 Sept 2026, 17:01 UTC≈6,760 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Только что закрыла шоу Marco Rambaldi в Милане. На сегодня это все новости 😂♥️ P.S. спасибо всем причастным. И непричастным тоже огромное спасибо 🙏🏻

18 Sept 2026, 14:50 UTC≈3,740 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @ksenia_solovievaPhoto

Немного об образах со вчерашнего Дня рождения “Кролика”, куда надо было прийти в космическом. Платья хозяйки вечера Ирины Зарьковой и Наташи Максимовой ждали своего часа по три года. Ира – в подиумном Y Project. Наташа – в Saint Laurent широко обсуждаемого Энтони Вакарелло. На картинке не видно, но у платья жесткие “акульи” плавники, и Наташа долгое время боялась ими кого-нибудь поранить. Вчера вроде бы удалось не п…

14 Sept 2026, 18:33 UTC≈3,800 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @tatlersheroinePhoto

Буквально «как друг черканул мне в тетради и как ответил я». В принципе, жители Газы должны быть рады, что вопросами операций возмездия занимается не Наталья

1 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC≈5,980 viewsread 6 November 2026
Video

Добрый день, товарищи. Вспомнила, что у меня же Телега есть. И поняла - а воз и ныне там 🙈

7 Jun 2026, 14:50 UTC≈7,290 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @taknagloPhoto

Не видите здесь Наташу Максимову? А она есть

2 Jun 2026, 09:30 UTC≈6,660 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @tvrkmprVideo

Моя кошка в 6 утра в моей кровати с намеком на пустую миску:

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @obozhaba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ОБОЖАБА” (@obozhaba), 8,276 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/obozhaba.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.