Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Двойная сплошная

Channel

Двойная сплошная

@double_solid

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

101,378subscribers

+2,641 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001233851102
TypeChannel
Username@double_solid
Description[email protected] Сотрудничество: @do_not_cross Реестр РКН: https://clck.ru/3FmvqJ
Created14 June 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/double_solid

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

98,737101,379100,0585 August 2026 — 98,737 subscribers6 August 2026 — 98,737 subscribers6 August 2026 — 98,768 subscribers7 August 2026 — 98,941 subscribers8 August 2026 — 99,117 subscribers9 August 2026 — 99,333 subscribers10 August 2026 — 99,464 subscribers11 August 2026 — 99,458 subscribers12 August 2026 — 99,429 subscribers13 August 2026 — 99,692 subscribers14 August 2026 — 100,030 subscribers16 August 2026 — 100,259 subscribers17 August 2026 — 100,386 subscribers18 August 2026 — 100,360 subscribers19 August 2026 — 100,384 subscribers20 August 2026 — 100,547 subscribers21 August 2026 — 100,738 subscribers22 August 2026 — 101,005 subscribers24 August 2026 — 101,283 subscribers25 August 2026 — 101,379 subscribers26 August 2026 — 101,378 subscribers101,3785 August 202626 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 21 days, net +2,641. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 98,341–101,775 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 12:24101,378-1
25 Aug 2026, 12:52101,379+96
24 Aug 2026, 09:37101,283+278
22 Aug 2026, 16:26101,005+267
21 Aug 2026, 10:27100,738+191
20 Aug 2026, 13:35100,547+163
19 Aug 2026, 16:26100,384+24
18 Aug 2026, 18:43100,360-26
17 Aug 2026, 15:08100,386+127
16 Aug 2026, 08:57100,259+229
14 Aug 2026, 19:36100,030+338
13 Aug 2026, 07:5799,692+263
12 Aug 2026, 10:4899,429-29
11 Aug 2026, 08:3299,458-6
10 Aug 2026, 11:2099,464+131
9 Aug 2026, 08:3199,333+216
8 Aug 2026, 06:1899,117+176
7 Aug 2026, 07:0698,941+173
6 Aug 2026, 07:3198,768+31
6 Aug 2026, 01:3398,737first reading

Engagement

114 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.1%
avg views ÷ 101,378 subscribers
Avg views / post
21,400
114 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
114
of 114 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held114 (2 August 202626 August 2026)
Views total2,436,900
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 00:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11,200
Videos
1,470
Links
2,050

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
21m 19s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 49 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC≈11,100 viewsread 27 August 2026
Video

Слышите звон бубенцов? Вот и мы не слышим

26 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC≈13,600 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Мы не можем доказать, но кажется этот Гарольд скрывает боль

26 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈12,700 viewsread 27 August 2026
Video

Это какая-то новая стадия глюкознутости?

26 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC≈16,900 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Опять на маркетплейсе была распродажа?

26 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC≈15,000 viewsread 27 August 2026
Video

Как ощущается середина недели с коридором затемнений, магнитными бурями и ретроградным Меркурием одновременно

25 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC≈17,200 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Пропустили момент, когда Настюшка вставила себе силиконовые тити. И зачем…

25 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC≈17,400 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

На месте Ляси начали бы опасаться

25 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC≈21,700 viewsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Та самая тетя, которая предлагает примерить джинсики на картонке

25 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC≈21,200 viewsread 27 August 2026
Video

Можно, пожалуйста, с работой так на денек?

24 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC≈21,000 viewsread 27 August 2026
Video

Майя Плисецкая танцует «Игру в кости». Здесь ей 52 года. Волочковой сейчас 50. Называется, почувствуйте разницу

Showing the 12 most recent of 114 posts we hold for @double_solid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 20,177 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Главный политический
@glavpolit · 33,601
8 posts
Героиня Татлера
@tatlersheroine · 100,981
7 posts
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,972,414
5 posts
МАРТЫНОВ
@martynov2021 · 210,114
5 posts
КЛИШАС
@andreyklishas · 18,062
3 posts
Валентин Богданов
@valentinbogdanov · 40,713
3 posts
Журналистика
@dddjournalism · 130,371
2 posts
🐍МОСКВИЧКА🐍
@glavmoskvichka · 35,079
2 posts
Андрей Медведев
@MedvedevVesti · 184,226
2 posts
Подгорнов.Экспертиза
@npodgornov · 13,293
2 posts
Друид
@wisedruidd · 59,292
2 posts
ВОТ ТЕ ЦИФРУ! | новости IT, электроники и медиа
@DigitmadePeople · 1,700
1 post
Профессор смотрит в мiръ. Авторский Анонимный канал Дмитрия Евстафьева
@dimonundmir · 208,574
1 post
Доктор Z прописал
@docpro · 141,110
1 post
ДОКТОР СОСНОВСКИЙ
@dr_alex_sosnowski · 113,913
1 post
Ирина Волк
@IrinaVolk_MVD · 52,159
1 post
Лобушкин
@lobushkin · 100,081
1 post
Марина Ахмедова
@Marinaslovo · 99,093
1 post
Образ будущего
@obrazbuduschego2 · 165,447
1 post
Дума.Онлайн
@onlineduma · 14
1 post
Кульминация Кушанашвили
@otarkushanashvili · 8,850
1 post
СОЛОВЬЁВ
@solovievlive · 1,096,051
1 post
ВЛагерь
@vlagr · 10,410
1 post
Захар Прилепин
@zakharprilepin · 226,190
1 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бабская курилка
@kureelka · 125,280
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
СОБЧАК
@ksbchk · 374,073
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
Продюсер Kartoz
@kartozz · 123,941
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 301,374
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
НеМалахов
@nemalahov · 127,394
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Super.ru
@SuperRu · 197,886
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Сергей Минаев
@minaevlife · 319,109
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Стрелец-Молодец
@strelets_molodec · 358,230
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Луис Иванович
@LIVfashionmag · 202,699
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
НЕБОЖЕНА
@imnotbozhena · 504,040
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 August 2026
СысоевFM
@sysoevfm · 370,072
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
MUR
@fashion_mur · 209,898
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
ЧТИВО
@chtvmag · 130,323
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,159,040
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Двойная сплошная” (@double_solid), 101,378 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/double_solid.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.