Spend Your Crypto Anywhere with @Rune • Instant card issuance • No KYC required • No frozen funds • Only 2.5% top-up fee Compatible with Apple Pay, Google Pay, and AliPay. (paid ad)
👍8👎3

Channel
@observer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
14,954subscribers
-149 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002468037913 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @gazette @observer |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 50 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/observer |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:22 | 14,954 | -16 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 14,970 | -26 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 14,996 | -15 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 15,011 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:28 | 15,013 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 15,022 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:14 | 15,030 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:46 | 15,034 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 15,037 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 15,046 | -18 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:39 | 15,064 | -22 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 15,086 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 15,096 | +6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:23 | 15,090 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 15,098 | +7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 15,091 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 15,093 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 15,096 | +6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 15,090 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 15,095 | first reading |
45 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 45 (17 July 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 56,350 |
| Reactions total | 3,229 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,804 reactions across 44 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤯 | 3,008 | 51.8% | |
| ❤ | 2,386 | 41.1% | |
| 👍 | 256 | 4.41% | |
| 😭 | 56 | 0.965% | |
| 🤣 | 39 | 0.672% | |
| 🔥 | 35 | 0.603% | |
| 🌚 | 12 | 0.207% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 0.086% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 0.069% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.052% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,804 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @observer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Spend Your Crypto Anywhere with @Rune • Instant card issuance • No KYC required • No frozen funds • Only 2.5% top-up fee Compatible with Apple Pay, Google Pay, and AliPay. (paid ad)
👍8👎3
😂 FUN FACT: Man stole $67K from his dad and spent it on sausage rolls and OnlyFans Stephan Dewar stole £52,000 (~$67K) from his father’s bank account and blew it on sausage rolls, female content creators, and online gambling. Jailed in the UK after his father noticed the missing funds. History’s most honest financial breakdown. 👇 💎 The #1 No KYC crypto exchange with 0.4% fees EagleSwap.to / @EagleSwap 🔔 @Observer …
👍11❤6
😂 FUN FACT: Chinese collector accidentally sold a Plush Pepe for $2 A Chinese collector accepted a buy offer on Plush Pepe #583 for 125 Stars, roughly $2. Current floor value: ~$7,500. Someone just got a Plush Pepe for the price of a coffee. 👇 💎 The #1 No KYC crypto exchange with 0.4% fees EagleSwap.to / @EagleSwap 🔔 @Observer • 💬 Join community • 🎁 Weekly Giveaway
🔥12👍7
🔍 Browse, Buy, Sell. Every OG username listing, from every major seller, in one feed. Prices, history, sellers — tracked and compared automatically. Browse over 10,000 handles, and buy via escrow. List your own @'s now and get paid. TRY @HandleHub OUT: ✈ Mini-app: t.me/handlebot/app ⬅️ 🌐 Web: handlehub.app ⬅️ (paid ad)
👍10
⚠️ JUST IN: Intelligence Cup #1 handed personally by Durov to AI olympiad winner Artem Gorokhov, winner of the AI olympiad, received Intelligence Cup #1 directly from Pavel Durov. He's not upgrading it for now, but has already said he'd sell it for no less than $100,000. Fun fact: receiving a gift from Durov unlocks free DMs with him. The olympiad winners, being rational people, immediately hit "Block → Spam + Del…
🤯994👍9
❤️ join @suspension for the most reliable roblox bans in com (paid ad)
👍13😭10
⚠️ JUST IN: Two TeamPCP hackers arrested in Perth Ruben Ian Thomson, 21, and Louis Michael Gaebler, 23, were arrested in Perth yesterday in a joint AFP/FBI operation. TeamPCP compromised 1,000+ organizations worldwide by injecting malicious code into open-source security tools like Trivy, Checkmarx KICS, and LiteLLM, stealing 500,000+ corporate credentials from CI/CD pipelines and 300GB of data. Both denied bail. …
🤯1,000👍6
#BB @sect blitzing the chain (paid ad)
❤11👍5
⚠️ JUST IN: Interpol busts Black Axe crypto fraud network across 22 countries Operation Jackal IV ran 8 months (Nov 2025 to Jun 2026), resulting in 58 arrests and 263 suspects identified across 22 countries. West African groups like Black Axe ran romance scams, crypto investment fraud, and business email compromise worldwide. In Romania alone, one call center scammed €143M globally promising stock and crypto returns…
🔥1
⚠️ JUST IN: Las Vegas man convicted for $24M Brent Kovar told 400+ investors his company Profit Connect used AI on a supercomputer to mine crypto and generate 15-30% guaranteed annual returns. None of it existed. He spent the money on a house, employee gifts, and repaying early investors to keep the scheme alive. Convicted on 15 federal counts after a 9-day trial. Sentencing November 30. Faces up to 280 years. 👇 👜…
🔥5👍2
😂 FUN FACT: Man accidentally sold a $100K+ Telegram number for 800 $GRAM A user listed anonymous number +888 0000 0777 for sale, intending to price it at 79,900 GRAM (~$100K+). He typed 799 GRAM instead. It sold instantly. Forgot to add two zeros. Someone just got the deal of the year. 👇 👜 Sponsored by @Sold, the #1 marketplace. 🔔 @Observer • 💬 Join community • 🎁 Weekly Giveaway
👍7❤4
No longer on @bankrupt, my username now is @pistol. I'm not associated with @bankrupt anymore.
🤯1,010👍10
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @observer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@observer edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@observer named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Observer” (@observer), 14,954 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/observer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.