Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 49 days, net -69,515. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 03:18
38
-112,727
17 Sept 2026, 09:37
112,765
+1,365
15 Sept 2026, 09:56
111,400
-1,012
13 Sept 2026, 18:18
112,412
-1,328
12 Sept 2026, 00:21
113,740
+1,390
9 Sept 2026, 16:01
112,350
-2,448
6 Sept 2026, 06:57
114,798
-301
3 Sept 2026, 21:17
115,099
+896
2 Sept 2026, 15:34
114,203
+952
1 Sept 2026, 17:25
113,251
+1,097
31 Aug 2026, 17:29
112,154
+491
30 Aug 2026, 17:34
111,663
+1,222
29 Aug 2026, 17:17
110,441
+1,886
28 Aug 2026, 17:43
108,555
+1,885
27 Aug 2026, 14:43
106,670
+1,011
26 Aug 2026, 16:43
105,659
+815
25 Aug 2026, 17:02
104,844
+1,661
24 Aug 2026, 15:16
103,183
+1,939
22 Aug 2026, 21:22
101,244
+2,383
21 Aug 2026, 13:52
98,861
first reading
Engagement
355 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13351.2%
avg views ÷ 38 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,070
193 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
193
of 355 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
355 (5 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
979,180
Reactions total
75,790
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Sept 2026, 00:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
33m 39s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
121,909 reactions across 355 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
85,515
70.1%
❤
23,352
19.2%
🕊
8,436
6.92%
👾
2,785
2.28%
👎
912
0.748%
🤬
909
0.746%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 355 of the 355 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121,909 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 355 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Правозащитники, кстати, обратились к Дурову
Они требуют сделать платные реакции анонимными по умолчанию
А также добавить постоянную настройку анонимности и скрыть уже опубликованные списки отправителей
❤️ — Это нам надо
🤡 — Т3ррористы-онанисты в панике
8 лет за реакции в Telegram
57-летний житель Тюмени оставлял под платные реакции под постами иноагентов и экстремистов
Общая сумма поддержки огромная — 130 реакций на целых 292,99 рубля
Мужчину приговорили к 8 годам колонии строгого режима
🕊 — Отпустить
🤡 — Посадить
OkoNews - Новости ТГ 📢
Мёртвую муху-дрозофилу научили играть в Казино. Она выбила джекпот 🤯
Муха уже забрала свой бонус и выигрывает реальный кэш.
Выигрывай и ты. Вместе с мухой и @TonPlay. 😎
Наличку начнут отслеживать
Банки будут проверять происхождение денег при пополнении счета через банкомат
Контроль коснётся ВСЕХ — и физлиц, и компаний. Под проверку попадут внесение рублей и обмен наличной валюты
🪙 WINKYBITS - Быстрый и дешевый обмен!
промо: bonus150
Призёры олимпиад в вузах — ВСЁ
Призёров олимпиад хотят лишить льготы на гарантированное поступление
Теперь они также будут сдавать вступительные экзамены — об этом сообщили в Минобрнауки
При этом, победителям олимпиад льготу сохранят
❤️ — ИМБА
🤡 — Уроды
OkoNews - Новости ТГ 📢
Второй номер без второй SIM-карты
— Не хочется покупать дополнительную SIM-карту?
⚡️Виртуальные номер без симок и лишних проблем уже внутри @FastSMSpro_Bot.
Удобный вариант для разовых и анонимных регистраций в сервисах под различные цели.
(Создание второго аккаунта, регистрация под абузы и т.д)
Один сервис — больше возможностей.
@FastSMSpro_Bot
Блокировка счета из-за имени
Росфинмониторинг предложил ввести новое правило для блокировки счетов
Теперь, если твое ФИО и дата рождения совпадают с должником, операцию могут приостановить
OkoNews - Новости ТГ 📢
ФБР взломали
Хакеры ломанули серверы министерства и утащили данные ВСЕХ сотрудников
Журналисты уже проверили часть записей и подтвердили совпадения
❤️ — Слоняры
🤡 — Долбаебы
🪙 WINKYBITS - Быстрый и дешевый обмен!
промо: bonus150
📲 MАX ТЕПЕРЬ АНОНИМЕН!
— Из-за раздачи номеров от Tolko SMS
В наше время важны быстрые смс с номеров, огромное количество Физ. Сим, дешевая аренда +888, а главное — низкие цены, поддержка и комфорт в использовании сервиса
🤝 Спустя долгое время работы нам удалось вместить все эти качества в наш проект, пользуйся: https://t.me/tolkosms_bot
Сериалы в России запрещены
Курьер из Москвы где-то достал демо российского сериала, который он выложил на торрент
В итоге сериал набрал 150к просмотров, из-за чего ему теперь грозит до 6 лет тюряги
Ущерб правообладателю оценили более чем на 15 млн рублей
🕊 — F чувачку
❤️ — Правильно сделали
OkoNews - Новости ТГ 📢
Любишь БДСМ? В ПСИХУШКУ
Минздрав утвердил рекомендации по расстройствам сексуального поведения
Теперь таких «страдающих» от садомазахизма, фетишизма и других состояний будут лечить
БДСМ?
❤️ — Я садист мазохист жесткий.
🤡 — Не нравится такое
🪙 WINKYBITS - Быстрый и дешевый обмен!
промо: bonus150
❤180🤡80🤬3👾2
Showing the 12 most recent of 355 posts we hold for @okonews_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 11 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 199%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 355 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@okonews_tg named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@settings named in 1 post, 31 August 2026 – 31 August 2026
@trashbox named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“okoNews live” (@okonews_tg), 38 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/okonews_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.