Channel
@omegazoon
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,032subscribers
-2,436 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002209577665 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @omegazoon |
| Created | 30 May 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 43 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/omegazoon |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 15:57 | 21,032 | -39 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 14:46 | 21,071 | -44 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:08 | 21,115 | -32 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:21 | 21,147 | -21 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:46 | 21,168 | -47 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:00 | 21,215 | -44 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:46 | 21,259 | -30 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:50 | 21,289 | -33 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:10 | 21,322 | -32 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 21,354 | -45 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:10 | 21,399 | -21 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:08 | 21,420 | -34 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:27 | 21,454 | -34 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:06 | 21,488 | -45 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:10 | 21,533 | -71 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:27 | 21,604 | -47 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:26 | 21,651 | -35 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:06 | 21,686 | -37 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:14 | 21,723 | -24 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 23:04 | 21,747 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 30 May 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (30 May 2024 – 22 October 2026) |
| Views total | 7,090 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 14:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Important Ann : Due to the sensitive nature of financial activities, preventive measures against potential misuse, and applicable international compliance requirements, certain accounts flagged for potentially suspicious financial activity are currently under review. These reviews may include screening for suspected money laundering, concealment of funds, and other financial compliance risks ! www.Omegafocus.com O…
ATS-HFT Robot: A More In-Depth Look at How It Works Omegafocus.com
🤖ATS – High Frequency Trading (HFT) ATS High Frequency Trading (HFT) is an advanced algorithmic trading system designed to execute a large number of trades within milliseconds. By leveraging cutting-edge technology, real-time market analysis, and automated execution, ATS identifies short-term market opportunities with exceptional speed and precision. Unlike traditional trading methods, ATS continuously monitors mark…
✅✅✅ Congratulations to Our Winners We are pleased to announce that three lucky winners have been selected from 311 Award-qualified participants🥂 Due to the logistical and transportation challenges associated with delivering the vehicles, each winner will receive the equivalent cash value of the prize in Bitcoin (BTC) instead of the vehicle. The winners listed below are kindly requested to contact our Support Team by…
✨Winners will be announced on the specified date on the portal under this post.
Upcoming New Trading Bots ✅
We must look around us every day, learn from it, and move towards the future. Notice Due to updates in our company's trading framework, our previous announcements have been removed. Our traditional trading system remains active and has been integrated with our new trading model. Therefore, the previous posts no longer reflected our current services and have been updated. For more details , Please left this channel…
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @omegazoon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OMEGA NEWS” (@omegazoon), 21,032 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/omegazoon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.