Channel
@orkd1957
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
723subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001381602254 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @orkd1957 |
| Created | 18 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/orkd1957 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 723 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:59 | 726 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 728 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 726 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 726 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
48 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 52.1% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 22.9% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 8.33% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 8.33% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎉 С Днем рождения, Иван Иванович! Сегодня большая команда Общества российско‑китайской дружбы с радостью и теплотой поздравляет Председателя ОРКД, Первого заместителя Председателя Государственной Думы Ивана Ивановича Мельникова — с Днем рождения! 🔺Иван Иванович для нас — не просто руководитель, он человек, который умеет объединять и вдохновлять. Его мудрость и чуткость создают в команде особенную атмосферу: здесь п…
❤6👍3🙏1
🎁 Тульский пряник: больше, чем просто сладость Даже если Вы не любите пряники, то про Тульский – определенно слышали, ведь это не просто лакомство, а настоящий символ города Тулы и одно из самых узнаваемых гастрономических сокровищ России. 🔥 Поверхность каждого пряника украшена рельефным узором или надписью — их наносят с помощью специальных деревянных форм, которые мастера бережно передают из поколения в поколение…
❤3👍2🙏1
🤩 Общество российско‑китайской дружбы в Туле: «пряничный» мост между традициями России и Китая 1 августа Тульский кремль превратился в настоящую площадку дружбы народов — здесь прошел XI Всероссийский фестиваль «День пряника». В этом году праздник впервые вышел на международный уровень, и важную роль в этом сыграло Общество российско‑китайской дружбы. Благодаря усилиям ОРКД удалось не просто добавить в программу «ки…
❤2👍2🔥1
📸 В завершение постов про поездку в Хэйлунцзян предлагаем вместе с нашими делегатами: 🟡побывать на симфоническом концерте, посвященном 25-летию Договора о добрососедстве, дружбе и сотрудничестве, 🟢заглянуть в Харбинский политехнический университет, 🟡посетить парк Снега и льда 🟢и, конечно, прогуляться по улочкам Харбина — города, где многие годы переплетаются русская и китайская культуры. ❤️ Спасибо Хэйлунцзяну и на…
❤4👍1🔥1
Есть у нас одна добрая традиция: после визита делегации ОРКД в КНР вступать в переписку с «Китайской угрозой» 😅 Согласитесь, сложно договориться о чем-то по-настоящему важном, если никогда не видел своего потенциального партнера. Гораздо проще найти общий язык, когда можно посмотреть в глаза, лично обсудить идеи и сразу почувствовать, насколько совпадают ваши взгляды и цели. Поэтому мы регулярно собираем разнообраз…
❤6👍2🔥2😁2
🤝 Делегация ОРКД в Хэйлунцзяне: дни, наполненные смыслом и теплом дружбы 🔥 Программа пребывания делегации Общества российско‑китайской дружбы в провинции Хэйлунцзян была по‑настоящему насыщенной. 🙏🏻 От всей души благодарим председателя Народного правительства провинции госпожу Лян Хуэйлин и её команду за высокий уровень приёма и особое внимание к нашим представителям. Такое гостеприимство и открытость к диалогу — л…
❤4😁2👍1👻1🙏1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @orkd1957. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОРКД (Общество российско-китайской дружбы)” (@orkd1957), 723 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orkd1957.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.