Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OSSиноегнездо

Channel

OSSиноегнездо

@ossinoe

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,693subscribers

-483 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001424125096
TypeChannel
Username@ossinoe
Created17 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 October 2026
Measurements held52
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ossinoe

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,69315,17614,934.56 August 2026 — 15,176 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,176 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,175 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,172 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,167 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,156 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,151 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,147 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,137 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,133 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,126 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,115 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,108 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,103 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,099 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,097 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,003 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,995 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,983 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,978 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,976 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,972 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,969 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,964 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,958 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,960 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,961 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,959 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,952 subscribers9 September 2026 — 14,949 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,938 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,936 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,924 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,892 subscribers25 September 2026 — 14,785 subscribers4 October 2026 — 14,766 subscribers8 October 2026 — 14,746 subscribers13 October 2026 — 14,737 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,725 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,730 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,729 subscribers17 October 2026 — 14,715 subscribers18 October 2026 — 14,711 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,715 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,717 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,720 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,723 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,709 subscribers25 October 2026 — 14,704 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,695 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,698 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,693 subscribers6 August 202629 October 2026
52 measurements spanning 85 days, net -483. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,621–15,248 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Oct 2026, 13:5914,693-5
28 Oct 2026, 14:1914,698+3
26 Oct 2026, 19:5714,695-9
25 Oct 2026, 17:3814,704-5
24 Oct 2026, 17:3014,709-14
23 Oct 2026, 17:1714,723+3
22 Oct 2026, 14:5914,720+3
21 Oct 2026, 11:5714,717+2
20 Oct 2026, 12:5914,715+4
18 Oct 2026, 10:2814,711-4
17 Oct 2026, 11:2814,715-14
16 Oct 2026, 10:4114,729-1
15 Oct 2026, 08:5914,730+5
14 Oct 2026, 11:5114,725-12
13 Oct 2026, 00:0914,737-9
8 Oct 2026, 13:1614,746-20
4 Oct 2026, 02:3614,766-19
25 Sept 2026, 12:0014,785-107
17 Sept 2026, 06:0214,892-32
15 Sept 2026, 05:5814,924first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 35 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32m 12s
Average length
16m 06s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,746 reactions across 35 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯2,05743.3%
❤1,00721.2%
😢3367.08%
🙏3246.83%
🤯2775.84%
🔥2294.83%
🙊1443.03%
👏962.02%
👌691.45%
🤔551.16%
⚡491.03%
🗿400.843%
🐳230.485%
💔180.379%
🥰170.358%
🕊50.105%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,746 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 35 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ossinoe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 09:59 UTC990 views132 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Читаю - "школа - это ад". "Школа - это тюрьма". Ой-ой. Слушайте, образование, социализация - это всегда укрощение стихии "хочу" и "буду только так, как я хочу". Взросление - это сложно. Без ограничений не вырастает человек. Пушкину тоже приходилось вставать рано и учить уроки. Как поколение наших предков хотело учиться, а? Дети знали - учеба - это привилегия. Школа и университет - билет в новую жизнь, путь к мечте. К…

💯129🗿3

Signed Nataly Oss

31 Aug 2026, 22:34 UTC≈3,180 views264 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Думаю о том, что русские почти религиозно поклоняются лету. Оно у нас короткое, капризное, прозрачное, но столько радости в нем и нежной покорности русской судьбе. Всякий русский человек тайно надеется на лето. Всякий русский человек прощается с летом как с несбывшейся любовью. Сколько бы ее ни было, все мало. Лета нам мало.

💯185❤64🔥6🐳3🗿2😢2💔1🤯1

Signed Nataly Oss

30 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC≈1,780 views60 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

«Любая положительная эмоция отразится на боеспособности подразделения в целом», - говорит руководитель штаба Юнармии и герой России Владислав Головин Мы обсуждаем опыт героев, в котором много повседневной работы. Просто делай. Есть в этом ежедневном служении что-то героическое. Но тут-то реальные герои. Головин говорит, что детская открытка, присланная бойцам, может повлиять на ход боеввх действий. И я думаю о то…

❤43🔥10🗿4🙏3

Signed Nataly Oss

27 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC≈2,270 views86 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @Agdchan

Быть либералом - это безбожно.

💯57🔥19🐳6❤2🙊2

Signed Nataly Oss

27 Aug 2026, 06:55 UTC≈2,270 views99 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Нашла для вас изумительное про воспитание литераторов, патриотических и беглых либералистических. Пишет Бершидский (иноагент? Бывший главред «Ведомостей», ныне подвизающийся в странах НАТО). Ключевое, что разделяет - вера и любовь к русской земле в ее изначальном смысле - земли, основы, корней, опоры. У людей без веры нет ни Родины, ни любви

💯66❤24🔥3🥰3🤔2🙊1

Signed Nataly Oss

24 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC≈2,590 views207 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Очередь за приключениями Ну что, даром просмотр сайтов с новыми машинами не проходит. Натурально, попала в ДТП. Машинка обиделась на меня. Поехала искать бензин. Благо и искать нечего - разливали в 1 минуте от дома. Встала в очередь. Никого не трогаю. Народу мало. Позади пристроилась машина. Я все поглядывала - большая ли за мной выстроится очередь. Нет, только одна эта машина. Но мне ее и одной хватило. Сижу, ж…

❤128🙏57🔥15😢4🗿2🙊1

Signed Nataly Oss

23 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC≈2,640 views157 reactions11 Starsread 3 September 2026

Я тут изучила вопрос с семейной ипотекой на ИЖС и квартиры в регионах и госсубсидией на авто. И сделала для себя интересный вывод. Казалось бы, идеально - семьям с детьми дают возможность купить квартиру дешевле. Казалось бы, можно купить авто российской китайской сборки дешевле. Но! Вся штука в том, что цены буквально привязаны к кредитному лимиту. Вот еще недавно двушка в Анапе - 6 млн у застройщика (это я стат…

💯139😢10❤5🔥1🥰1🙊1

Signed Nataly Oss

20 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC≈2,690 views51 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @frankalexandra

Спасибо дорогая, передам свей команде ❤️ https://t.me/ossinoe/20102

🔥33❤14🙊3🥰1

Signed Nataly Oss

19 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC≈3,150 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Камчатские люди культуры в реальном и историческом пейзажах в фильме Александры Франк по книге Игоря Мальцева. И совершенно завораживающие кадры природы. Что еще мне нравится чисто профессионально - что графика не спорит с красотой пейзажа, а вписана в него. Хорошее кино!

❤41👏4💯1🗿1🙊1

Signed Nataly Oss

19 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC≈3,060 views39 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Эдвард Чеснаков последовательно троллит либеральную публику чудовищной пьесой. Я читала. Это хороший абсурд) https://t.me/chesnokmedia/17950

🔥26👏10🤯2🙊1

Signed Nataly Oss

17 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC≈3,010 views119 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Читаю о том, как надо дать ребенку выбрать горшок. Не пойму - в Озон его привести или в магазин за горшком поехать? Ну, допустим. Но мне интересно, а как наши дедки и бабки приучались к горшку - выбором нравящейся модели? Сдается мне, что нет. Просто бегали голоштанные. А теперь у людей евроремонты и горшок - ад и кошмар родителя. Особенно того, кто слышит со всех сторон, что "моя дети писали и какали уже в 8 месяцев…

💯54⚡37🤔11❤10🙊5🐳1🗿1

Signed Nataly Oss

15 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC≈3,600 views179 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤178🙊1

Signed Nataly Oss

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @ossinoe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

real cultras
@real_cultras · 24,178
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
Анна Долгарева | Стихи
@dolgareva · 19,648
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OSSиноегнездо” (@ossinoe), 14,693 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ossinoe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.