Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 28 days, net +36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 362–408 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 12:37
403
+6
27 Aug 2026, 12:25
397
+13
21 Aug 2026, 09:45
384
+8
14 Aug 2026, 21:04
376
+9
8 Aug 2026, 06:30
367
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:22
367
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
229 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
152
66.4%
💔
46
20.1%
🔥
8
3.49%
🕊
8
3.49%
👍
5
2.18%
👏
4
1.75%
😢
2
0.873%
🥰
2
0.873%
😭
1
0.437%
🦄
1
0.437%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 229 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 December 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
قرار بود این قرنِ بیستمِ ما بهتر از قبل باشد دیگر فرصت نمیکند این را ثابت کند سالهایِ اندکی از آن مانده سلانه سلانه پیش میرود نفسش به شمار افتاده.
از بلاهایی که قرار نبود، دیگر بیش از حد سرش آمده و آنچه که قرار بود اتفاق بیفتد اتفاق نیفتاده است.
قرار بود رو به بهار باشد و از جمله رو به خوشبختی قرار بود ترس، کوهها و درهها را خالی کند قرار بود حقیقت زودتر از دروغ به مقصد برسد.
قرار بود دیگر بدبختیهایی …
امیدِ آمدن لغتی که نمیآید
آنچه زبان میخورد
همیشه همان چیزیست
که زبان را میخورد:
امیدِ آمدن ِلغتی
لغتی که نمیآید
تو آنسوتر آنجاتر
برابر من ایستادهای
برابر با من
و چهرهام
چیزی به آینه از من نمیدهد
چیزی از آینه در من میکاهد
و انتظار صخرهی سرخ
نوکِ زبانِ تو –
امیدِ آمدن ِلغتیست
لغتی که نمیآید…
یدالله رویایی
Photo by Man Ray
@pajandski
از مجموعهٔ جیبیهای چارسو، مجموعهداستان «مرگ برقآسای مادربزرگ» نوشتهٔ ساسان مژده بهزودی منتشر میشود؛ کتابی دربارهٔ مرگ، پیری، عشق و زندگی، و پرسشهایی که در مرز میان بودن و نبودن سر برمیآورند.
این مجموعه سه داستان را دربرمیگیرد؛ روایتهایی که هر یک از پنجرهای متفاوت به زندگی و خاموشی مینگرند و در فضایی مهآلود و تأملبرانگیز، با حلقهای از مرگ به یکدیگر پیوند میخورند.
کتابی که بیش از آنکه پاسخ بدهد، پرسش …
معرفی کتاب | کتاب پدران
بعضی خانوادهها فقط خاطره به ارث میگذارند؛ بعضی دیگر، سرنوشت.
«کتاب پدران» اثر میکلوش واموس، حماسهای خانوادگی است که داستان چند نسل را در دل تاریخ مجارستان دنبال میکند. در این رمان، هر پسر، گویی حافظهای از پدران پیش از خود را با خود حمل میکند؛ انگار گذشته هیچوقت تمام نمیشود و هر نسل، ادامهی ناتمام نسل قبل است.
واموس تاریخ را از پشت تریبون روایت نمیکند؛ تاریخ را پشت میز شام، در اتاق…
📌 #دوره_های_بهار_ته_رنگ
#داستان_در_ته_رنگ
«قصهات را بنویس»
با پژند سلیمانی
___
🖋 در این دورهی هشتجلسهای، به خواندن، بررسی و نوشتن داستان میپردازیم. شرکتکنندگان با عناصر اصلی روایت آشنا میشوند؛ از انتخاب راوی و شکل دادن به فرم روایت گرفته تا پیدا کردن نقطهی مناسب برای آغاز داستان، پیش بردن داستان و رسیدن به پایانی اثرگذار.
در طول جلسات، با خواندن نمونههایی از داستانها و انجام تمرینهای نوشتاری، هر شر…
ما در این ترس و در این درد تنها نیستیم. باید به خودمان حق بدهیم. ما داریم ترومایی جمعی را از سر میگذرانیم. با دیدن هر تصویر، وسط کارهایمان، در صف انتظار بانک، روی صندلی اتوبوس بیآرتی، وسط مترو، روی خطهای سفید عابر… میزنیم زیر گریه. فرو میریزیم. فرو ریختهایم. ما میترسیم. روزی هزار بار از همه خداحافظی میکنیم، لیستهایمان را خط میزنیم. ما در این احساسات، در این زمانهٔ عجیب، بعد از تمام آنچه از سر گذراندها…
غوطهوری
غوطهور گسیختگیهای امواجی تو در سر من امکان شناورشدن استخوان ماهیها هست! میبلعید ستارههای شبرو گم کرده راه را کوچ کردیم به ارض ناموعود عاقلان آب پاشیدند پشتسرمان دیوانهی دیوانگانِ سنگ پرانی هستم ـ هدف معلوم است! نعلین سوزان بود دور آتش جمع شده بودند خندان لب ولبالب از (به تو چه! دهن کجی من به یاقوتپرستی بود که دقمرگ میشود از ( مثلاً) افراط درخوشبختی و خیره شدهست به قاتل و مقتولی که در نگین انگشتر…
«مرگ بهترین سروری است برای آن کس که هرگز شادی را نشناخته!»
اژدهاک/ بهرام بیضایی
یکماه از نبودنش میگذرد و نوشتههایش، اندیشهاش تا همیشه خواهد ماند.
@pajandski
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pajandski. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@pajandski named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@payamcharsoo named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pajand| پژند” (@pajandski), 403 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pajandski.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.