Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Паратайп

Channel

Паратайп

@paratype_fonts

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,073subscribers

+114 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001420759867
TypeChannel
Username@paratype_fonts
DescriptionСамый большой магазин шрифтов в России: https://www.paratype.ru НИИ шрифтового дизайна, технологий и особенностей кириллицы Для сотрудничества: @ADFadeeva Заказать шрифт: [email protected] Задать любой шрифтовой вопрос: https://t.me/Paratype_help_bot
Created6 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/paratype_fonts

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,9586,0796,018.56 August 2026 — 5,959 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,958 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,963 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,960 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,974 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,979 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,984 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,989 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,993 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,984 subscribers10 September 2026 — 5,982 subscribers14 September 2026 — 5,988 subscribers18 September 2026 — 5,993 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,000 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,014 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,053 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,060 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,065 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,069 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,079 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,069 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,071 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,073 subscribers6,0736 August 20265 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 91 days, net +114. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,940–6,097 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 04:006,073+2
1 Nov 2026, 20:276,071+2
30 Oct 2026, 02:386,069-10
27 Oct 2026, 06:456,079+10
24 Oct 2026, 04:556,069+4
17 Oct 2026, 21:346,065+5
15 Oct 2026, 06:006,060+7
12 Oct 2026, 11:016,053+39
5 Oct 2026, 11:556,014+14
27 Sept 2026, 17:556,000+7
18 Sept 2026, 03:385,993+5
14 Sept 2026, 02:215,988+6
10 Sept 2026, 03:005,982-2
4 Sept 2026, 11:185,984-9
31 Aug 2026, 14:565,993+4
25 Aug 2026, 14:145,989+5
22 Aug 2026, 15:165,984+5
19 Aug 2026, 08:275,979+5
16 Aug 2026, 18:275,974+14
12 Aug 2026, 21:345,960first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.7%
avg views ÷ 6,073 subscribers
Avg views / post
648
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held12 (23 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total3,238
Reactions total165
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 17:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,040
Videos
≈107
Links
≈591

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

323 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤12438.4%
custom 53099938934067367918426.0%
❤‍🔥4714.6%
🔥4112.7%
👍123.72%
💯82.48%
😁41.24%
🤓20.619%
😱10.31%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 323 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC338 views21 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Очень хотим встретиться с вами в Петербурге… и знаете что? Встретимся! Зовём вас на «Шрифовой бранч» — уютный митап о шрифтах, который мы делаем вместе с ВКПБ (встречи команд питерского брендинга, а не то, о чём вы могли подумать). Билеты уже положили сюда: https://deza-event.timepad.ru/event/4291938/ Будем жевать булки и пить кофе, готовиться к зиме, жаловаться друг другу и говорить слова поддержки. А Саша, Тома,…

🔥8❤‍🔥7custom 53099938934067367916

Signed Anastasia Fadeeva

2 Nov 2026, 10:01 UTC692 views38 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Ода хаггису шотландской антикве В последние месяцы мы всё чаще слышим сочетание «шотландская антиква» — таким тихим шёпотом. Кто-то спрашивает, что это такое, кому-то наши дизайнеры рекомендуют к ней приглядеться для проекта, да и сама она крадучись проникает в шрифтовые тренды. Это всё навело на мысль сделать пост. Шотландская антиква (или англо-шотландская, Scotch Roman) появилась в конце XVIII и стала особенно …

❤24❤‍🔥8custom 53099938934067367916

Signed Anastasia Fadeeva

31 Oct 2026, 14:54 UTC657 views33 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @hsedesignPhoto

ужасы и шрифты, часть 2 продолжаем вместе со шрифтовой студией «Паратайп» разбираться, как типографика создаёт напряжение в кино. на этот раз в центре внимания — «Чужой», «Субстанция» и «Изгоняющий дьявола». смотрим, как постепенно появляющиеся буквы усиливают ожидание неизвестного, почему плотный набор может буквально давить на зрителя и каким образом старинные гарнитуры создают ощущение мистики. листайте карточк…

❤15custom 530999389340673679112❤‍🔥6

Signed Anastasia Fadeeva

29 Oct 2026, 10:21 UTC781 views36 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Эсэмэмщица, главред и два шрифтовых дизайнера смотрели ужасы, чтобы получился этот пост 🐶

❤23💯8😁4😱1

Signed Anastasia Fadeeva

29 Oct 2026, 10:04 UTC770 views37 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @hsedesignPhoto

ужасы и шрифты, часть 1 😈😈 что общего у «Сияния», «Психо», «Суспирии» и «Закулисья реальности»? помимо тревожной атмосферы, у каждого из этих фильмов есть ещё один инструмент создания саспенса — типографика. ✏️вместе со шрифтовой студией «Паратайп» решили разобраться, как дизайнеры заставляют зрителей нервничать ещё до начала фильма. оказывается, для этого необязательно использовать искажённые буквы или очевидно пу…

❤‍🔥14custom 530999389340673679114👍5❤2🔥2

Signed Anastasia Fadeeva

10 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC537 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🐶 Если у вас есть знакомые, которые регулярно ищут шрифты для CapCut, Капкута, кап капа, кут кута и т. д. — отправляйте им эту статью: https://info.paratype.ru/fonts-for-capcut/ В ней Саша Королькова и Даша Савина собрали начальную базу по выбору шрифтов для reels, типографике и возможностям работы со шрифтом в этой программе.

❤11custom 530999389340673679111❤‍🔥3👍2🔥2🤓2

Signed Anastasia Fadeeva

5 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC860 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

👀Нужны шрифты с «памятью места»: Ник Недашковский Пока готовили пост о рабочем месте Ника, поговорили с ним немного о философском и практическом в шрифтах. Публикуем этот разговор: Какие шрифты нужны современным дизайнерам? Думаю, современным дизайнерам нужны скорее не «модные», а гибкие шрифты: удобные в работе, различимые там, где это важно, со знаками, которые соответствуют традициям и нормам письма, и с осями п…

❤14🔥14custom 530999389340673679110👍2

Signed Anastasia Fadeeva

4 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC779 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

кто владелец рабочего места?

  1. Александр Капуста18%
  2. Белла Чаева12%
  3. Александр Любовенко12%
  4. Геннадий Фридман15%
  5. Ник Недашковский42%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Anastasia Fadeeva

4 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC713 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Держать под рукой только то, что приносит удовольствие, помогает настроиться и, желательно, легко возобновляется. Например, у меня это блокнот и 0.35 черная ручка muji. Так говорит шрифтовой дизайнер, чьё рабочее место вы видите прямо сейчас. Это пятый пост о команде Паратайпа. Но на этот раз мы не сможем показать владельца конкретно за этим столом, потому что… он уже переехал, доказывая, что «идеального рабочего м…

❤9custom 53099938934067367915🔥3❤‍🔥1

Signed Anastasia Fadeeva

31 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC944 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🐶 Нам всегда интересно, как наши шрифты видят дизайнеры. Сегодня показываем фрагменты лендингов от студентов первого курса Института бизнеса и дизайна со шрифтами Паратайпа в главной роли. авторы: Григорий Кураков София Григорянц Мария Гребешкова Яна Герасименко Вероника Страхова преподаватель: Григорий Кравченко шрифты: DIN 2014 HARP DISPLAY KUDRY SIMON VAST ITC BAUHAUS

🔥9❤‍🔥5❤3👍2custom 53099938934067367912

Signed Anastasia Fadeeva

29 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTC940 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

👀 Что нового в магазине? Редкие начертания Futura PT и обновление Magistral Заметили, что дизайнеры всё чаще прибегают к моноширинным шрифтам? Мы тоже (спойлер: скоро поделимся своим мнением о трендах в шрифтах). Теперь в Futura PT тоже есть моноширинность — два новых начертания — прямое и наклонное. Их редко можно найти в других версиях Футуры. Немного истории: Футуру разработал Пауль Реннер для фирмы Bauersche G…

❤18❤‍🔥3custom 53099938934067367913

Signed Anastasia Fadeeva

23 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC702 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @pperedelkinoPhoto

Мы начинаем новую тематическую серию встреч книжного клуба, где ведущими станут люди, чья профессия связана с типографикой. Обсудим не только книги, но и их шрифты! 25 июля — типограф Руслан Князев. Говорим о рассказе Хорхе Луиса Борхеса «Тлен, Укбар, Orbis Tertius». 1 августа — Александра Королькова, шрифтовой дизайнер, книжный дизайнер, арт-директор шрифтовой студии Паратайп, автор книги «Живая типографика». Чит…

custom 530999389340673679115❤5🔥3👍1

Signed Dasha Savina

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @paratype_fonts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTCAnonymous Quiz92 voters

кто владелец рабочего места?

  1. Александр Капуста18%
  2. Белла Чаева12%
  3. Александр Любовенко12%
  4. Геннадий Фридман15%
  5. Ник Недашковский42%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бесплатные шрифты
@shrift_free · 57,292
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Паратайп” (@paratype_fonts), 6,073 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paratype_fonts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.