Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for liberté, visualité, identité

Channel

liberté, visualité, identité

@snegotronreturns

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2,290subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001088460641
TypeChannel
Username@snegotronreturns
Created24 November 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/snegotronreturns

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,2852,2922,288.56 August 2026 — 2,290 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,290 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,289 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,288 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,292 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,291 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,288 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,289 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,286 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,285 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,290 subscribers2,2906 August 202615 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 40 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,284–2,293 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 04:382,290+5
7 Sept 2026, 10:022,285-1
27 Aug 2026, 18:472,286-3
24 Aug 2026, 22:352,289+1
20 Aug 2026, 22:432,288-3
18 Aug 2026, 08:112,291-1
15 Aug 2026, 08:172,292+4
11 Aug 2026, 19:262,288-1
9 Aug 2026, 05:212,289-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:512,290no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:532,290first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 31 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

618 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
55389.5%
👻335.34%
🌚325.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 618 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 21:26 UTC901 views131 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Позавчера, 21-го, умер Ливанов, большой художник; ну а мне повезло у него учиться в Полиграфе. Сам он впрочем был вовсе не полиграфовский а ВГИКовский (только сейчас понял что с Сахалтуевым, автором Врунгеля, они не только друзья но и однокурсники). В Ливанове была соответствующая киношная шикарность: с артистом Ливановым — который Шерлок Холмс и Карлсон — у Александра Андреевича был один голос на двоих (нет, они не

118🌚7👻6

22 Apr 2026, 13:51 UTC≈3,450 views92 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Светлана Алперс в знаменитой книжке про Рембрандта пишет, что в Нидерландах XVII века различали две живописные манеры: net (нежная, гладкая) и rouw (грубая), причем «грубая» манера предназначалась для работы на более искушенных и изысканных клиентов; на тех, кто может насладиться жизнеподобием, явленным через как бы наспех сделанную форму, через нарочно грубый и жирный мазок краски, своего рода свидетельство и доказа

75👻9🌚8

27 Mar 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,680 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @shukagramPhoto

Ищем дизайнера с опытом в брендинге от 4-х лет. 🔗– ссылка на форму

27👻2🌚1

24 Mar 2026, 14:49 UTC≈2,740 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://telegra.ph/Ryu-de-Depart-26-Parizh-03-24 Эссе Линды ван Дёрсен, открывающее книжку Notes on Experimental Jetset (Roma publications, 2015) — замечательный пример дизайн-мышления; не из попсовых ютуб-шоу, а вот того, как мыслит хороший дизайнер (Линда скорее даже великая, она придумала среди прочего тот самый лого Стейделика, например). Честно говоря всю остальную книжку я долгое время не дочитывал, так сильно

51🌚1

11 Mar 2026, 19:26 UTC≈1,760 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Написал текст для дружественного канала, но поскольку знаю что среди подписчиков liberté есть немало коллекционеров спортивных авто решил запостить и сюда тоже

10

11 Mar 2026, 19:26 UTC≈1,890 views70 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @shukagramVideo

«Дизайн всего». Дебют. Мы начинаем новую серию размышлений о том, как дизайн проявляется во всём, что формирует контекст вокруг. Сегодня — Ваня Величко о тактильности зрения, спрятанных дверных ручках и атлантах, построивших Петербург (и старые машины). Я не вожу машину и, наверное, никогда уж и не стану, но страстно люблю автомобили платонически: как идею. Я идеальный автолюбитель, круглый, в вакууме. Разумеется,

62👻8

14 Feb 2026, 20:04 UTC≈3,810 views150 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Красииво Красииво, говорит преподаватель дизайна саркастически, всем своим видом показывая что обсуждать в такой бестолковой работе решительно нечего; красиво — говорит другой преподаватель с восхищением, имея в виду исключительное одобрение, для которого прочие слова слишком обыденны; человеку молодому и неопытному легко запутаться в оттенках интонаций красоты. Так и что же в итоге — «красиво» — это хорошо или плох

138🌚12

31 Dec 2025, 17:38 UTC≈2,740 views83 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Осенью сделал три плаката для любимых дружочков — Родиона К., Юли К. и Иры К.; могу сказать что конечно художники становятся очень строгими, когда дело касается их собственных картинок, буквы должны быть поменьше, изображения — побольше. Но и маленькие буквы тоже должны звучать как следует, так что в будущем году буду прилежно рисовать: италик для Гертруды (впрочем он конечно скорее сам по себе стал шрифт) и вот то,

72👻8🌚3

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @snegotronreturns. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“liberté, visualité, identité” (@snegotronreturns), 2,290 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/snegotronreturns.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.