Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PASEKOV ⚛️ AI ZAVOD

Channel

PASEKOV ⚛️ AI ZAVOD

@pasekov_news

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

928subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001765586614
TypeChannel
Username@pasekov_news
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pasekov_news

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

928951939.57 August 2026 — 951 subscribers7 August 2026 — 951 subscribers15 August 2026 — 950 subscribers22 August 2026 — 946 subscribers28 August 2026 — 940 subscribers5 September 2026 — 931 subscribers14 September 2026 — 928 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 38 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 925–954 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 09:39928-3
5 Sept 2026, 20:57931-9
28 Aug 2026, 23:48940-6
22 Aug 2026, 20:48946-4
15 Aug 2026, 09:29950-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:01951no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:56951first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 23 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

96 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6365.6%
2526.0%
👍44.17%
🥰22.08%
💯11.04%
🫡11.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2025 to 9 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Feb 2026, 07:58 UTC449 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пока пилю свой огромный контент-завод для "особенных" ниш потихоньку наблюдаю то что делает мой бот в твиттере (я даже не проверяю контент) Спойлер: он чувствует себя ОЧЕНЬ хорошо вот пример того что он делает и сколько (и самое главное - ОТ КОГО) собирает лайков просто чекните - мне ставят лайки крипто-маркетинговые агенства, огромные сообщества и вообще крутые игроки с сотнями тысяч фолловеров! я считаю что это

5🔥4

29 Jan 2026, 11:53 UTC442 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Твиттер-бот начал собирать просмотры) лол Идем дальше) Реализовал его на собственном серваке с помощью довольно простых штук, а он генерирует вот такое :D

🔥21

28 Jan 2026, 13:56 UTC378 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Котята объясняют как работают КОНТЕНТ-ЗАВОДЫ) Говорят, что если хочешь быть понятным - объясняй как 5-ти летнему! ИЗВИНИТЕ(-СЬ)!

5🔥3👍1

27 Jan 2026, 13:36 UTC312 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😮 Написал бота который: а) Сам парсит новости по RSS с крипто-новостников б) Сам анализирует новостной тренд чтобы попасть в настроение толпы в твиттере в) Сам пишет саркастический твит + хэштеги по которым твит найдут г) Сам пишет промт для угарной картинки в) Сам все компонует г) Сам все постит! Сказка) 😎 А еще он ВСЕГДА помнит о чем писал ранее и может на это ссылаться) 😯 Пожалуйста порадуйтесь вместе со мной)

🔥214

14 Jan 2026, 15:11 UTC365 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Хотите честную обратную связь про себя? Раньше, чтобы лучше понять себя, мы писали дневники, перечитывали переписки, спорили с близкими, проживали кризисы. Это были долгие, болезненные и часто неструктурированные процессы. Есть одно упражнение, которое я иногда делаю. Думаю, все, кто тут сидит, так или иначе пользются ChatGPT как минимум год. А он же сохраняет весь свой цифровой след общения в — вопросы, уточнени

🔥32👍2🥰2

25 Dec 2025, 09:14 UTC395 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🛑 СТОП! ХВАТИТ ЮЗАТЬ CHATGPT ДЛЯ БИЗНЕСА Спасибо за ваши ответы в опросе выше! Вижу, что запрос на связку Бизнес + ИИ огромный. Ловите базу, которая избавит вас от ошибок, сэкономит вам кучу нервов и времени. 👇 Почему ChatGPT — это треш? ❌ Многие до сих пор по привычке идут туда, но для серьезных задач он часто бесполезен: Уверенная ложь. Он может выдать фейковую инфу с таким лицом, будто это истина в последней инс

🔥162🫡1

24 Dec 2025, 05:26 UTC301 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

КАКИЕ ФИШКИ РАССКАЗАТЬ? У меня есть много опыта которым я еще не поделился, но все я рассказать не успею, ПОЭТОМУ ВЫБИРАЕМ!

  1. Промпты хотим для всех нейросетей38%
  2. Нужны новые сервисы на каждый случай жизни25%
  3. Как кодить контент-завод13%
  4. Хотим умный контент типа «как работают алгоритмы во всех соцсетях»31%
  5. Как связать бизнес и ии? Как использовать? Какие нейросети? Как настроить?50%

The shares total 157%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3🔥2

23 Dec 2025, 09:05 UTC384 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

😮 КОНТЕНТ-ЗАВОД: ОТ ПЕРВЫХ ПРОМТОВ ДО СОБСТВЕННОГО СЕРВЕРА Многие думают, что контент — это творчество. На самом деле, в 2025 году — это производство. Контент-заводы (КЗ) бывают трех видов: 😺 Ручной: СММ-щик на зарплате. Дорого, медленно, привязано к настроению человека. 💀 Автомат: Всё делают скрипты. Подходит для массового трэш-контента или простых форматов, где не страшно потерять в качестве. 🕺 Полуавтомат (Мой

🔥123👍1💯1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @pasekov_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Dec 2025, 05:26 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

КАКИЕ ФИШКИ РАССКАЗАТЬ? У меня есть много опыта которым я еще не поделился, но все я рассказать не успею, ПОЭТОМУ ВЫБИРАЕМ!

  1. Промпты хотим для всех нейросетей38%
  2. Нужны новые сервисы на каждый случай жизни25%
  3. Как кодить контент-завод13%
  4. Хотим умный контент типа «как работают алгоритмы во всех соцсетях»31%
  5. Как связать бизнес и ии? Как использовать? Какие нейросети? Как настроить?50%

The shares total 157%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2025 to 9 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

XDAO | Official channel 💠
@xdaoapp · 2,194,206
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PASEKOV ⚛️ AI ZAVOD” (@pasekov_news), 928 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pasekov_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.