Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
111 measurements spanning 32 days, net -7,721. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 484,217–494,307 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 111
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 21:55
485,381
-42
6 Sept 2026, 13:37
485,423
-353
5 Sept 2026, 09:57
485,776
-37
5 Sept 2026, 04:56
485,813
-183
4 Sept 2026, 07:18
485,996
-67
4 Sept 2026, 01:55
486,063
-125
3 Sept 2026, 12:20
486,188
-28
3 Sept 2026, 09:53
486,216
-47
2 Sept 2026, 23:19
486,263
-51
2 Sept 2026, 18:49
486,314
-198
2 Sept 2026, 02:52
486,512
no change
2 Sept 2026, 02:48
486,512
+8
2 Sept 2026, 00:05
486,504
-143
1 Sept 2026, 16:03
486,647
-259
1 Sept 2026, 05:38
486,906
-14
1 Sept 2026, 04:49
486,920
-49
31 Aug 2026, 23:26
486,969
-147
31 Aug 2026, 14:46
487,116
-152
31 Aug 2026, 07:35
487,268
-83
31 Aug 2026, 01:14
487,351
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 485,381 subscribers
Avg views / post
52,600
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.097%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held
35 (8 June 2026 – 6 September 2026)
Views total
736,480
Reactions total
715
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Sept 2026, 04:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
113
Videos
14
Links
311
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,511 reactions across 35 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,927
76.7%
👍
269
10.7%
🔥
78
3.11%
👏
58
2.31%
👎
32
1.27%
🥰
23
0.916%
👀
18
0.717%
💯
18
0.717%
⚡
14
0.558%
👌
12
0.478%
🤓
11
0.438%
🤔
11
0.438%
🤣
11
0.438%
🥱
11
0.438%
🤩
5
0.199%
🎉
3
0.119%
🏆
3
0.119%
😁
3
0.119%
🤨
3
0.119%
🍌
1
0.04%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,511 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 35 we hold a reading for · 51%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @peliculas. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 June 2026 to 6 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎬🤖 'Ink': Danny Boyle confirma que usó IA generativa, y el debate que abre es más gordo de lo que parece
Boyle reconoce unos 30 segundos de IA generativa en Ink, su retrato del nacimiento de The Sun con Jack O'Connell y Guy Pearce: ratones generados, fotos antiguas animadas. Poca cosa en apariencia, pero es exactamente la clase de normalización que lo cambia todo.
Lo que chirría no es el uso puntual sino la direcci…
🎬 Bruce Campbell tiene cinco años de vida. Lo dice sin aspavientos, porque es Bruce Campbell.
"The current thing is a five-year deal." Así anunció ante Adam Carolla su pronóstico de cáncer incurable: con la calma gamberra de siempre. Hay gente que se derrumba ante una noticia así. Él la convierte en una frase de guion.
El actor de 'Posesión infernal' y 'El ejército de las tinieblas' decidió vivir con ello, no morir…
🍿 La Odisea: el negocio del fetichismo 70mm
📆 Estreno: Ya en cines (17 julio 2026)
🎭 Género: #Épica #Acción #Aventura
✈️ Añadir película
Nolan extiende el 70mm hasta septiembre y los cines siguen llenos. 450 millones recaudados solo en IMAX, con Matt Damon como Odiseo. La máquina funciona.
Me chirría el relato. El 70mm es espectacular, pero si el IMAX más cercano está a tres horas, o haces peregrinación o ves otra…
🚀 ¿Buscas una forma más fácil de crear vídeos con IA?
Ya seas editor o creador de contenido, ClipChat AI te ayuda a crear vídeos de alta calidad y sincronizados con el ritmo en cuestión de minutos.
✨ Genera vídeos a partir de texto
🎵 Sube tu propia música
⚡️ Sincronización con el ritmo mediante IA
🎬 Hasta 9 planos por escena
🆓 Plan gratuito disponible (vídeos de hasta 60s)
💻 Fácil de usar, impulsado por NanoBanana …
🎬 200 dólares de presupuesto. 4,5 millones recaudados. Y una sala que les dijo que no la estrenasen.
Niu Lai es la película china de animación que lleva semanas partiéndome la cabeza. La hizo un dúo madre-hijo casi sin medios: modelos torpes, animación tosca, doblaje irregular. Y aun así algo funciona, porque la banda sonora, compuesta e interpretada por la madre, tiene una honestidad que desarma.
Lo que me compra …
🍿Depp vuelve. Y el test screening dice que funciona.
📆 Estreno: 13 de noviembre de 2026
🎭 Género: #Terror #Fantasía #NavidadGótica
✈️ Añadir película
Johnny Depp como Scrooge bajo la dirección de Ti West es una apuesta que, sobre el papel, me intriga mucho. West sabe construir atmósfera con precisión quirúrgica, y Depp lleva años sin un papel que le quede bien de verdad. Un 80 en test screening no es un milagro, pe…
🎬 National Treasure 3 ya es real. Y sí, vuelve Nicolas Cage.
Jon Turteltaub lo confirmó en el National Treasure Weekend de Filadelfia: la tercera entrega es un hecho. Cage vuelve como Ben Gates y el director asegura que el objetivo es recuperar a todo el reparto original. Abigail, Riley... todos.
Me alegra que no hayan cedido a hacerlo sin Turteltaub ni sin Cage. La primera tenía algo genuino: un Indiana Jones de S…
🎬 Ridley Scott a los 87 sin freno. "Isla del Tesoro" con Hugh Jackman de pirata y rodaje en noviembre
Quiere sumar a Hugh Grant y a Owen Cooper, el chaval de "Adolescence" que arrasó en los Emmy. Tres Hughs habrían sido un chiste demasiado bueno, pero con dos ya me compra la propuesta.
Scott lleva temporadas funcionando en modo industrial, entregando en plazo y en presupuesto, aunque con guiones flojos se le nota m…
🎬 Tom Holland y los 100 millones de razones para no retirarse
Salario base de 20 millones más bonus sobre 2.000 millones de recaudación. Sony le paga lo que pide porque sin él su división live-action es un páramo.
Hace un año hablaba de desaparecer y hacer el biopic de Fred Astaire. Legítimo, pero cien millones tienen una gravedad que dobla cualquier convicción. La pregunta es cuántas entregas más aguanta el person…
🎬🤖 Mujeres chinas se enamoran de la IA. Y hay un documental que lo toma en serio.
Replica, de Chouwa Liang, sigue a tres mujeres que mantienen relaciones sentimentales con novios generados por IA. Tres años de rodaje, cero condescendencia.
El MIFF lo compara con 'Her', pero lo interesante va más allá: detrás hay una soledad sistémica arraigada en culturas donde "te quiero" no se dice, parejas ausentes, presión de c…
🎬 Ted Sarandos llamó al cine en sala un concepto anticuado. La taquilla lleva ocho películas y más de 1.000 millones contestándole.
El CEO de Netflix tiene sus razones, y sus márgenes de beneficio (cerca del 30%) dan la razón a la plataforma como negocio. Pero como argumento cultural, la pifia es mayúscula.
Mientras tanto, Netflix tira 320 millones en 'The Electric State' y cosecha críticas tibias. Gastar como un e…
🍿 El blockbuster de verano que no le debe nada a ninguna franquicia
📆 Estreno: 14 de agosto de 2026
🎭 Género: #CienciaFicción · #Thriller · #Aventura
✈️ Añadir película
Un evento cósmico arranca Oak Street de los años 80 y la planta en un lugar lleno de dinosaurios. Suena a disparate, y lo es. Pero con David Robert Mitchell al volante (el mismo de It Follows) me fío del caos controlado.
Anne Hathaway y Ewan McGreg…
❤65👍10🔥3⚡1👀1
Signed L
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @peliculas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@peliculas edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
7 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Musica Clasica - Classical Music @musicaClasica · 16,021#52
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
movies & series 🍿 @series · 359,995 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 24 August 2026
games 👾 @leaderboard · 54,866 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
8 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“películas y series 🍿” (@peliculas), 485,381 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peliculas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.