Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for El show de tío Andresito

Channel

El show de tío Andresito

@tioandresito

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

717subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001865851660
TypeChannel
Username@tioandresito
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tioandresito

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

717726721.57 August 2026 — 726 subscribers8 August 2026 — 726 subscribers14 August 2026 — 722 subscribers21 August 2026 — 719 subscribers3 September 2026 — 717 subscribers7 August 20263 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 27 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 716–727 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 13:41717-2
21 Aug 2026, 09:35719-3
14 Aug 2026, 23:57722-4
8 Aug 2026, 02:06726no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:15726first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 22 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏457.1%
342.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 22 October 2025 to 3 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Dec 2025, 15:03 UTC≈1,750 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Parece que esta vez he ganado yo. Así que también me llevo un punto. Me alegra que os haya gustado el metro 😁

1

17 Nov 2025, 13:49 UTC≈1,560 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Amigos, gracias a todos por las fotos! Ahora vamos a elegir la más interesante.

  1. 1. Metro24%
  2. 2. Autobús9%
  3. 3. Bicicletas de alquiler3%
  4. 4. Carro de bebé15%
  5. 5. Camión de carga15%
  6. 6. Casa rodante9%
  7. 7. Bicicleta Fixie24%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2

7 Nov 2025, 15:04 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Nuestro tema de hoy es el medio de transporte. Fotografiad algún medio de transporte de vuestro entorno y subid la foto en los comentarios. Puede ser un coche, un autobús, una bicicleta o incluso un caballo. Cualquier medio que la gente use para moverse. En mi ciudad tenemos un metro como este.

30 Oct 2025, 15:06 UTC926 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Bueno, amigos, la votación ha terminado. En una reñida competencia ha ganado la foto del bonsái. Y eso significa que Artizen obtiene un punto.

👏4

22 Oct 2025, 10:36 UTC739 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Así que, vamos a votar: qué planta os ha parecido la más interesante?

  1. 1. Planta en el balcón0%
  2. 2. Colgada en el patio0%
  3. 3. Pinos silvestres en el bosque17%
  4. 4. Orquídeas27%
  5. 5. Planta con habitante en el Jade10%
  6. 6. Bonsai34%
  7. 7. El arbusto del vecino12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @tioandresito. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Nov 2025, 13:49 UTCAnonymous Poll33 voters

Amigos, gracias a todos por las fotos! Ahora vamos a elegir la más interesante.

  1. 1. Metro24%
  2. 2. Autobús9%
  3. 3. Bicicletas de alquiler3%
  4. 4. Carro de bebé15%
  5. 5. Camión de carga15%
  6. 6. Casa rodante9%
  7. 7. Bicicleta Fixie24%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Oct 2025, 10:36 UTCFinal Results41 voters

Así que, vamos a votar: qué planta os ha parecido la más interesante?

  1. 1. Planta en el balcón0%
  2. 2. Colgada en el patio0%
  3. 3. Pinos silvestres en el bosque17%
  4. 4. Orquídeas27%
  5. 5. Planta con habitante en el Jade10%
  6. 6. Bonsai34%
  7. 7. El arbusto del vecino12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 22 October 2025 to 3 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

VEHICULAR CAOS
@vehicularcaos · 23,146
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 19 September 2026
películas y series 🍿
@peliculas · 482,244
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 24 August 2026
Buzz 👨‍🏫 Quiz
@buzzquizzes · 22,972
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
Cosas que no sabías💡
@curiosidadesss · 50,815
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“El show de tío Andresito” (@tioandresito), 717 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tioandresito.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.