Channel
@pensiology
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,900subscribers
-108 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001500428350 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pensiology |
| Created | 1 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pensiology |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 18,900 | -2 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:02 | 18,902 | -6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 18,908 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 18,909 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 18,912 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 18,911 | -10 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:28 | 18,921 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:54 | 18,926 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:08 | 18,928 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 18,930 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 18,940 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 18,945 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 18,949 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 18,951 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:44 | 18,954 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 18,955 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 18,958 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 18,960 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 18,963 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 18,967 | first reading |
100 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 100 (2 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 29,869 |
| Reactions total | 61 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
224 reactions across 67 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 114 | 50.9% | |
| 👎 | 40 | 17.9% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 8.04% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 3.57% | |
| 🙊 | 8 | 3.57% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 3.57% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 2.68% | |
| 🥴 | 4 | 1.79% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 1.34% | |
| 💊 | 3 | 1.34% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 1.34% | |
| ☃ | 2 | 0.893% | |
| 🎃 | 2 | 0.893% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.893% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.446% | |
| 🙉 | 1 | 0.446% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.446% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 100 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 224 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2Vtzqua4mHD | 1 | 19 August 2026 | 19 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
❔ Как предоставить информацию для перечисления беззаявительных пенсий В случае проактивного назначения выплат, когда право на них возникает автоматически, без заявления от человека, для перечисления средств Соцфонду необходимы актуальные банковские реквизиты получателя. 🟢 Наличие данных, переданных через личный кабинет на Госуслугах, избавляет людей от необходимости отдельно подавать заявление о способе доставки оф…
❤1
Posted without readable text
❓ Когда может появиться необходимость в подаче заявления на перерасчет пенсии 💻 Если появились документы, которых не было при назначении пенсии или предыдущем перерасчете, например о подтверждении факта работы 💻 Изменилось количество нетрудоспособных членов семьи, находящихся на иждивении. При увеличении фиксированной выплаты учитываются не более 3 нетрудоспособных иждивенцев 💻 Пенсионер переехал в районы Крайнего…
Posted without readable text
❓ В каких случаях выплата пенсии приостанавливается 🔹 На 3 месяца — если инвалид не явился в назначенный срок на переосвидетельствование 🔹 На 6 месяцев: ➖ если пенсию не получали в течение 6 месяцев подряд. Например, когда счет для получения пенсии был закрыт, а заявление со сведениями о новых реквизитах не подавали ➖ ребенку, получающему пенсию по потере кормильца, исполнилось 18 лет и он не предоставил в Соцфон…
Что такое выплатное дело пенсионера и как его получить в СФР Зачастую пенсионеры сомневаются в правильности начисления своей пенсии. Но есть способ, как избавиться от этих сомнений — нужно запросить и получить свое пенсионное (выплатное) дело, изучить его, проверить исходные данные и итоговые расчеты. Чтобы получить выплатное дело пенсионера, нужно грамотно составить заявление и направить свой запрос в Социальный ф…
Posted without readable text
💬 О новой схеме мошенничества сообщили в нотариальной палате Злоумышленники звонят наследникам или присылают им сообщения в мессенджер якобы от сотрудника нотариальной конторы. Это может быть приглашение на получение документов по наследству, сопровождающееся вредоносной ссылкой на оплату. Человек проходит по ней, вводит данные карты, и те утекают в руки аферистам. 📎 Другой вариант уловки злоумышленников — уведомле…
Posted without readable text
💬 Пенсионеры без трудового стажа имеют право на социальную пенсию Неработающие пенсионеры в России не могут получать выплаты ниже прожиточного минимума, при необходимости им назначается соответствующая доплата. Об этом напомнил глава комитета Госдумы по труду, социальной политике и делам ветеранов Ярослав Нилов. 💬 По словам депутата, в стране действует норма, согласно которой доход неработающего пенсионера из бюдже…
❤2
📄 Если женщина ухаживает за свекровью с инвалидностью I группы или в возрасте от 80 лет, такой уход может быть объективной причиной отсутствия дохода для единого пособия Это также возможно, если свекровь младше 80 лет, но по заключению медицинской организации нуждается в постоянном постороннем уходе. 😉 С 21 июля 2026 года изменились правила учета ухода за нетрудоспособным человеком при назначении единого пособия. …
Добрый день, хочу поинтересоваться если опека над детьми оформлена на бабушку дедушку, родная мать может подать на этих детей на единое пособие? Бот-предложка для вопросов Спроси про пособия
Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @pensiology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@pensiology edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пенсии | ЛьготОтвет” (@pensiology), 18,900 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pensiology.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.