Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Petya English

Channel

Petya English

@petya_english

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

233,866subscribers

+16,281 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001470018085
TypeChannel
Username@petya_english
DescriptionЖизнь Пети и Ирис! Сотрудничество - @Karina_Makareniia Рутуб - https://rutube.ru/channel/66498211/ № 8077504908
Created25 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/petya_english

Topic

Travel — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

217,557234,045225,8016 August 2026 — 217,585 subscribers6 August 2026 — 217,588 subscribers7 August 2026 — 217,606 subscribers8 August 2026 — 217,557 subscribers9 August 2026 — 217,618 subscribers10 August 2026 — 220,442 subscribers11 August 2026 — 221,496 subscribers12 August 2026 — 221,995 subscribers13 August 2026 — 222,434 subscribers14 August 2026 — 227,840 subscribers16 August 2026 — 229,799 subscribers17 August 2026 — 230,417 subscribers18 August 2026 — 230,680 subscribers19 August 2026 — 230,939 subscribers20 August 2026 — 231,064 subscribers21 August 2026 — 231,119 subscribers22 August 2026 — 231,247 subscribers24 August 2026 — 231,404 subscribers25 August 2026 — 231,450 subscribers26 August 2026 — 231,532 subscribers27 August 2026 — 232,123 subscribers28 August 2026 — 232,527 subscribers29 August 2026 — 232,934 subscribers30 August 2026 — 233,501 subscribers31 August 2026 — 233,707 subscribers1 September 2026 — 233,800 subscribers2 September 2026 — 233,795 subscribers3 September 2026 — 233,798 subscribers5 September 2026 — 233,900 subscribers9 September 2026 — 233,873 subscribers11 September 2026 — 233,915 subscribers13 September 2026 — 233,873 subscribers15 September 2026 — 234,012 subscribers17 September 2026 — 234,045 subscribers19 September 2026 — 233,866 subscribers233,8666 August 202619 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net +16,281. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 215,084–236,518 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 11:17233,866-179
17 Sept 2026, 03:02234,045+33
15 Sept 2026, 04:37234,012+139
13 Sept 2026, 10:57233,873-42
11 Sept 2026, 13:21233,915+42
9 Sept 2026, 00:57233,873-27
5 Sept 2026, 16:39233,900+102
3 Sept 2026, 19:38233,798+3
2 Sept 2026, 12:38233,795-5
1 Sept 2026, 16:13233,800+93
31 Aug 2026, 18:36233,707+206
30 Aug 2026, 17:55233,501+567
29 Aug 2026, 15:07232,934+407
28 Aug 2026, 18:14232,527+404
27 Aug 2026, 17:19232,123+591
26 Aug 2026, 19:27231,532+82
25 Aug 2026, 18:52231,450+46
24 Aug 2026, 17:02231,404+157
22 Aug 2026, 23:15231,247+128
21 Aug 2026, 09:56231,119first reading

Engagement

168 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.6%
avg views ÷ 233,866 subscribers
Avg views / post
41,200
98 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
98
of 168 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held168 (28 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total4,041,600
Reactions total204,975
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
870
Videos
930
Links
213

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
28m 58s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 46 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

353,493 reactions across 161 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤217,64961.6%
custom 619523638883359775642,27012.0%
👍27,1757.69%
🔥21,4206.06%
😱15,4234.36%
😁9,5212.69%
😢5,8911.67%
🥰5,8231.65%
🤯2,7640.782%
🤩2,6100.738%
🎉1,2170.344%
💩1,1450.324%
👎5850.165%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 168 of the 168 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 364,212 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 168 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
887
across the posts below
Posts paid on
125
of 168 we hold a reading for · 74%
Most on one post
126
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @petya_english. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 168 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.595%
1 of 168 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
32,500
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
45,400
over 167 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqwqNoBa124 September 202624 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 168 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

25 Sept 2026, 08:46 UTC≈24,800 views2,182 reactions1 Starread 25 September 2026
Video

Скушал Ириску 😂

❤1,300😁493custom 6195236388833597756193🔥99🥰48😱35🤯14

24 Sept 2026, 13:34 UTC≈33,700 views1,203 reactions2 Starsread 25 September 2026
Photo

Знаю, что меня много смотрит именно семей с детьми, поэтому расписал какие есть подобные парки в Китае (сохраняйте) 👆🏻 Кстати, в своем гайде я более подробно расписал куда можно сходить с ребенком в Китае Многие писали именно про путешествия с детьми, поэтому я вынес это в отдельный блок🩷

custom 6195236388833597756738❤287👍102🥰39🔥24🎉9👎4

24 Sept 2026, 13:31 UTC≈30,800 views1,547 reactions1 Starread 25 September 2026
Photo

Как я писал уже выше, мы сейчас в Абу-Даби, где снимаем огромный проект на искусственном острове Для понимания: на нем построено ЧЕТЫРЕ крупнейших парка развлечений А размер острова составляем 2500 гектар И про это будет целый выпуск на ютуб 🎥

❤1,070🤩164custom 6195236388833597756121👍75🔥74😱28💩15

24 Sept 2026, 13:27 UTC≈29,400 views1,771 reactions1 Starread 25 September 2026
Photo

Крайние дни мы с Ирис находимся в приятном шоке 🩷🩷🩷

❤1,240🔥237custom 6195236388833597756156👍78🤩30🥰17💩13

24 Sept 2026, 10:10 UTC≈32,500 views735 reactions4 Starsread 25 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqwqNoBaVideo

Кажется, розетка нам больше не понадобится Xiaomi представила в России новую серию REDMI Note 17, а модель REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5G получила аккумулятор на 10 000 мАч. Это рекорд смартфонов Xiaomi. Не придется ждать часами пока смартфон зарядится: 100-ваттная зарядка HyperCharge быстро восстанавливает заряд. По данным Xiaomi, всего 20-ти минут у розетки хватает на целый день работы. Но и на этом сюрпризы не зака…

❤492custom 619523638883359775673👍61👎41💩33🤯24😁11

23 Sept 2026, 14:04 UTC≈36,800 views1,468 reactions1 Starread 25 September 2026

Как и обещал, отправляю вам файлик с локациями САМОЙ НЕОБЫЧНОЙ еды в Японии ☝️

❤1,040🔥182👍136custom 619523638883359775673🥰15🎉14🤯8

23 Sept 2026, 14:03 UTC≈36,400 views1,224 reactionsread 25 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤826👍194custom 6195236388833597756108🔥49🎉18😁18🥰11

23 Sept 2026, 13:02 UTC≈38,200 views2,546 reactions4 Starsread 25 September 2026
Photo

Пробуем всю САМУЮ НЕОБЫЧНУЮ ЕДУ в Японии 📱Уже на YouTube📱

❤1,800🔥338🤩154👍112custom 619523638883359775697🥰28💩17

23 Sept 2026, 10:52 UTC≈39,700 views2,608 reactions8 Starsread 25 September 2026
Video

В 16:00 по мск! 😍🩷🔥 Очень веселый ролик получился 😅😂

❤1,790🔥396custom 6195236388833597756223👍127🥰30😁21😱21

22 Sept 2026, 15:39 UTC≈43,200 views3,573 reactions3 Starsread 25 September 2026
Photo

Сегодня у нас был очень интересный и насыщенный день!

❤2,420👍533custom 6195236388833597756309🤩135🔥96😁67👎13

22 Sept 2026, 11:05 UTC≈45,000 views3,271 reactions2 Starsread 25 September 2026
Photo

Переписка с Ирис мамой 🩷😍😅

❤2,340custom 6195236388833597756446🔥250👍111🥰77🤯25😱22

21 Sept 2026, 15:53 UTC≈47,500 views3,362 reactions6 Starsread 25 September 2026
Video

Тем временем наши котики в отпуске от нас! 😅😂 Они сейчас живут с подружкой Ирис 😂

❤2,120custom 6195236388833597756739👍283🥰103🔥54🤩53💩10

Showing the 12 most recent of 168 posts we hold for @petya_english. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Sept 2026, 12:18 UTCAnonymous Poll8,640 voters approx.

Хотели бы ролик с перуанкой которая говорит по русски?

  1. Да 😍89%
  2. Нее13%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTCAnonymous Quiz20,600 voters approx.

где тут китайское блюдо? 👆🏻

  1. 127%
  2. 273%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTCAnonymous Quiz18,900 voters approx.

а здесь где китайская еда?👆🏻

  1. 147%
  2. 253%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTCAnonymous Quiz18,600 voters approx.

на каком фото китайская еда 👆🏻

  1. 168%
  2. 232%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 168 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

здесь живет броен
@br1anm7ps · 1,090,016
#1
Exile
@exilemusic13 · 1,445,701
#2
Маша и Роберт (Герберы)
@thegerberslive · 645,706
#3
EDISON FAMILY
@edisonfamilia · 776,895
#4
tenderlybae💔
@plsbetenderly · 225,418
#5
ул.Графская️👑
@graphdg · 114,274
#6
Глент 🚀
@vladglenttg · 576,068
#7
DILARA
@dilalara753 · 272,768
#8
Алексей Столяров блогер
@Stolyaric · 273,702
#9
dariaowll
@dariaowll · 12,417
#10
Я Ириска
@iriskalimei · 88,294
#11
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,368,903
#12
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,134,958
#13
Mash
@mash · 3,096,804
#14
Аня Ищук
@anyaischukkkk · 601,146
#15
ЕГОР ШКРЕД
@egorikvtg · 704,353
#16
Москвач • Новости Москвы
@moscowach · 4,111,005
#17
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,668,820
#18
КК
@petrovtel · 525,264
#19
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
@paradeevich · 1,059,396
#20
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 935,401
#21
Погнали! | Стас Натанзон
@pognaliofficial · 142,491
#22
OKB News / Новости от Ок блогера
@okbnews · 191,483
#23
Polinsi
@polinsilifestyle · 80,907
#24
Милашкина
@milashkina_nekrasova · 251,260
#25
PETROVA
@milanapetrovaqueen · 202,336
#26
GB FAMILY
@GOSPOSHA_EVELIN · 101,292
#27
Vi КЕЙНЕС
@keynece · 37,603
#28
нюбиби
@nvbibi · 12,971
#29
Eva Miller🏄🏼‍♀️
@evamillershaaa · 165,291
#30
Stray Kids | JYP ️️
@StrayKids_JYP · 166,211
#31
Своим Ходом - Виталик и Лиза
@svoimxodom · 103,745
#32
ваша Малина
@alinasevani · 80,397
#33
Милс Кел (Play)
@meels_kel · 325,227
#34
кухонный нож
@sorryykatana · 68,780
#35
Alina Muradimova 📷
@alina_muradi · 42,941
#36
Anka Peresild
@officialannaperesild · 183,249
#37
Clapp Snap!
@KateClappTelegram · 171,826
#38
Влад Бумага A4
@A4omg · 445,051
#39
Дом Знаменитостей
@thehouseofcelebs · 100,267
#40
Аслан Шукаша👷🏻
@aslanshukasha · 294,343
#41
всмысле Саша?
@nalunetelegram · 77,749
#42
Эвелинушка
@eveliinushka · 79,563
#43
The Люди. Лядов
@Theludi1 · 139,449
#44
запах минувших дней
@grazhinka1 · 146,468
#45
VEIGEL
@adelveigelll · 230,389
#46
Привет, Это Я МАША✌️😃 / Masha Zoom / Маша Зум
@itsmashazoom · 135,466
#47
Проект Шмеля - Катя Конасова
@proektshmel · 123,619
#48
Viki Show
@vikishow_official · 258,695
#49
Дневник путешественницы
@kseniamellie · 148,772
#50
ЗОВУТ ДОМЕР
@DomerGrief · 679,652
#51
Cozy, Tea & Lee ♡˖
@skyoctoberlee · 93,434
#52
Катя Корея🇰🇷
@koreakatya · 134,513
#53
НИКОЛАЙ ПО-КОРЕЙСКИ
@nikolaipak · 11,013
#54
Бадабумчик
@badabum4ikkk · 128,509
#55
blestuchka
@blestuchka · 83,141
#56
Niky Macaleen
@nikysarang · 33,450
#57
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,061,005
#58
Премиум эмодзи | стикеры | Premium Emoji
@TgEmojis · 1,677,800
#59
Kuplinov ► Play
@Kuplinov_Telegram · 913,893
#60
EkaterinaKoreaTG
@ekaterinakoreatg · 116,039
#61
ВИЛСАКОМ РЕД / WYLSACOM RED
@wylsared · 1,108,884
#62
808
@rbtshki · 200,704
#63

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Я Ириска
@iriskalimei · 88,294
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 17 August 2026
Dmitrii & Nivy
@dmitriinivy · 24,895
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 15 September 2026
Катя Корея🇰🇷
@koreakatya · 134,513
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 13 August 2026
Alexander Pilot - Путешествие с Пилотами
@dashapilotessa · 30,962
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 6 September 2026
Погнали! | Стас Натанзон
@pognaliofficial · 142,491
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Своим Ходом - Виталик и Лиза
@svoimxodom · 103,745
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Petya English” (@petya_english), 233,866 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/petya_english.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.