Channel
@pewviews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,112subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001892870755 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pewviews |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pewviews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 2,112 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 2,113 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 2,114 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 2,113 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 2,118 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 2,122 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 2,125 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 2,132 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 2,133 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:21 | 2,133 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 17 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
531 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 260 | 49.0% | |
| 🙏 | 79 | 14.9% | |
| 👀 | 68 | 12.8% | |
| 👍 | 52 | 9.79% | |
| 😈 | 19 | 3.58% | |
| 🤮 | 18 | 3.39% | |
| 👎 | 10 | 1.88% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 1.69% | |
| 🥱 | 4 | 0.753% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.565% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.377% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 0.377% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 0.377% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.188% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 0.188% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.188% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 531 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2025 to 4 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"Any preacher who rejects God's law, who denies repentance to be a condition of salvation, who assures the giddy and godless that they are loved by God, who declares that saving faith is nothing more than an act of the will which every person has the power to perform is a false prophet and should be shunned as a deadly plague." ~ Arthur Pink, “The Broad Way and the Narrow Way”
👍36❤14🔥6👎3💯1😡1
☝️ALL EYES ON IRAN!
🙏18❤3🔥1🥱1
👀👀👀
👀16🙏11❤3🥱2
"Verses of Scripture must not be wrenched from their setting, but weighed, interpreted, and applied in accord with their context; and that calls for prayerful consideration, careful meditation, and prolonged study; and it is failure at this point which accounts for these shoddy and worthless "messages" of this rush-ahead age." ~ Arthur Pink, “Studies in the Scriptures-Signs of the Times"
❤41🔥1
Follow us: t.me/pewviews
👀16❤8
👀 Follow us: t.me/pewviews
👀12❤5😱3👎2🤡1🥱1
DO NOT DIVIDE THE LAND!!! Follow us: t.me/pewviews
🙏26👀17👍5😁1
Trump's 21-Point Peace Plan Shocks Everyone https://endtimeheadlines.org/?p=429158
🙏8❤4👀3🔥1
Daniel 12:3 NASB1995 Those who have insight will shine brightly like the brightness of the expanse of heaven, and those who lead the many to righteousness, like the stars forever and ever. Follow us: t.me/pewviews
❤29
Psalm 75 We give thanks to You, O God, we give thanks, For Your name is near; Men declare Your wondrous works. “When I select an appointed time, It is I who judge with equity. “The earth and all who dwell in it melt; It is I who have firmly set its pillars. Selah. “I said to the boastful, ‘Do not boast,’ And to the wicked, ‘Do not lift up the horn; Do not lift up your horn on high, Do not speak with insolent pride…
❤34
Photo, posted without a caption
Quote from speech: "President Donald J. Trump: "The entire globalist concept of asking successful, industrialized nations to inflict pain on themselves and radically disrupt their entire societies MUST be rejected completely and totally — and it must be immediate. The challenge with trade is much the same as with climate: the countries that FOLLOWED the rules, all their factories have been plundered... by countries…
❤17🙏7😐2🤡1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @pewviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 949,675 of 1,629,403 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PewViews” (@pewviews), 2,112 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pewviews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.