National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @ILTVnews — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -2,076. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44,380–47,078 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 07:47
44,691
-27
6 Nov 2026, 05:18
44,718
-24
5 Nov 2026, 04:46
44,742
-37
4 Nov 2026, 04:51
44,779
-22
3 Nov 2026, 06:27
44,801
-9
2 Nov 2026, 07:25
44,810
-19
1 Nov 2026, 05:50
44,829
-24
31 Oct 2026, 07:15
44,853
-23
30 Oct 2026, 04:27
44,876
-5
29 Oct 2026, 01:51
44,881
+6
28 Oct 2026, 00:30
44,875
+16
27 Oct 2026, 00:25
44,859
-17
26 Oct 2026, 02:11
44,876
-10
24 Oct 2026, 22:36
44,886
-15
24 Oct 2026, 01:47
44,901
-2
23 Oct 2026, 05:19
44,903
-25
22 Oct 2026, 05:28
44,928
-37
21 Oct 2026, 01:47
44,965
-22
20 Oct 2026, 01:39
44,987
-24
18 Oct 2026, 23:46
45,011
first reading
Engagement
450 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.63%
avg views ÷ 44,691 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,960
144 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
144
of 450 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
450 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
426,700
Reactions total
18,952
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 16:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,930
Videos
≈3,260
Links
≈742
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5h 07m
Average length
1m 10s
Measured directly from 263 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
64,308 reactions across 450 posts, in 68 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🙏
12,755
19.8%
❤
9,322
14.5%
👍
8,137
12.7%
🤮
3,971
6.17%
🤬
3,917
6.09%
👏
3,865
6.01%
👎
3,539
5.50%
💩
3,020
4.70%
🤡
2,564
3.99%
😢
1,915
2.98%
💔
1,620
2.52%
🔥
1,513
2.35%
😁
1,499
2.33%
🤣
1,230
1.91%
🤔
1,164
1.81%
💯
714
1.11%
😱
503
0.782%
😭
496
0.771%
🖕
425
0.661%
🤯
313
0.487%
48 further kinds
1,826
2.84%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 450 of the 450 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64,308 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 450 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 144 posts held from the last 30 days (0.694%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Whoopi Goldberg, who has previously spoken about Jewish ancestry in her family, welcomed Michigan Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed to The View following his historic election as the first Muslim elected to the US Senate. The show’s panel largely celebrated his victory during Thursday’s interview.
Israel has its final election results, but still no government.
Gadi Eisenkot has secured 67 recommendations for prime minister, while Netanyahu faces a setback from his ultra-Orthodox allies.
But 67 recommendations don’t guarantee 61 seats in a governing coalition. So who will actually manage to form Israel’s next government?
Kim Kardashian just brought Israeli couture to the red carpet in Rome!
Styled by Law Roach, Kim stunned in a polka-dot gown from Tel Aviv-based fashion house Galia Lahav, turning a bridal runway look into Hollywood glamour.
Israeli fashion on the global stage! Hit or miss?
Mr. Zohran Mamdani, you want to talk about Gaza’s schools, infrastructure and where American money goes? Then let’s talk about Hamas.
From tunnels and rockets to the misuse of resources meant for civilians, why is Hamas missing from the conversation?
If you demand accountability, demand it from Hamas too.
Michigan’s newly elected Democratic Senator Abdul El-Sayed took aim at Vice President JD Vance and President Donald Trump following his election victory, joking about the upcoming Senate swearing-in ceremony in January.
“JD, habibi, there is this delicious irony in the fact that you’re constitutionally obligated to swear me in in January,” El-Sayed said, before delivering a message to the president: “And Trump, you …
Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Varsen Aghabekian says the PA would be willing to work with Yashar leader Gadi Eisenkot if he forms Israel’s next government, provided he respects Palestinian rights and international law. Speaking to Saudi channel Al Hadath, she said the PA could cooperate with anyone who recognizes Palestinians’ rights and seeks a peaceful future for the region.
Aghabekian also challenged Eis…
Democrats have won control of both chambers of Congress, and Abdul El-Sayed has become the first Muslim elected to the US Senate.
With El-Sayed calling for an end to military aid to Israel, could this election mark a major turning point in US-Israel relations?
From “Thrift Shop” to “Free Palestine,” Macklemore has turned his concerts into political rallies.
His European tour featured Greta Thunberg, Francesca Albanese and public support for convicted terrorist Marwan Barghouti.
Is this genuine activism, or has political controversy become Macklemore’s biggest career comeback?
A cyberattack targeted three blood storage facilities in France, with hackers attempting to raise refrigeration temperatures to dangerously high levels, potentially destroying plasma supplies used for transfusions and medicine production. The attack targeted a refrigeration equipment supplier, but monitoring systems detected the unusual temperature changes before any blood products or samples were damaged.
The incid…
Viewers of The Voice Israel spotted something unusual during a performance by Israeli singer Static: the entire audience appeared to be generated by artificial intelligence. People in the crowd could be seen clapping in perfect synchronization and displaying strangely similar smiles, quickly raising suspicions online. Static himself appeared to acknowledge the situation by commenting with a crying emoji on one of the…
Democrat Abdul El-Sayed has defeated Republican Mike Rogers in Michigan’s US Senate race, becoming the first Muslim elected to the US Senate. The former public health official will succeed Democratic Senator Gary Peters, marking a historic victory in one of the country’s closely watched Senate contests.
Ahead of the election results, El-Sayed delivered a speech criticizing Israel and the American Israel Public Affai…
“If you’re ever confused, I stand with the Jews.”
@boygeorgeofficial opens up about writing “We Will Dance Again,” his shock at the denial of October 7 and the backlash he faced for speaking out.
For him, the song wasn’t about his career. It was about standing up for what he believed in.
❤131👍36🙏14🤣4💩3
Showing the 12 most recent of 450 posts we hold for @ILTVnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @ILTVnews as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
22 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
22 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
13 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
11
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
11
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ILTVnews named 11 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@gal_gadot named in 3 posts, 3 September 2026 – 6 September 2026
@deansbomb named in 2 posts, 13 October 2026 – 14 October 2026
@itsbennyblanco named in 2 posts, 8 October 2026 – 10 October 2026
@angelinajolie named in 2 posts, 8 October 2026 – 10 October 2026
@ricky_martin named in 2 posts, 8 October 2026 – 10 October 2026
@montanatucker named in 2 posts, 8 October 2026 – 10 October 2026
@andrewgold_ok named in 2 posts, 6 September 2026 – 8 September 2026
@n12news named in 1 post, 3 November 2026 – 3 November 2026
@eden_alene named in 1 post, 3 November 2026 – 3 November 2026
@itaigalon named in 1 post, 10 October 2026 – 10 October 2026
@razshechnik named in 1 post, 10 October 2026 – 10 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Hananya Naftali - Israel News @hnaftali · 118,177#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
The Times of Israel @TheTimesOfIsrael2022 · 30,020 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 September 2026
Hananya Naftali - Israel News @hnaftali · 118,177 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
Israel Defense Forces @idfofficial · 157,892 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
The Jerusalem Post @The_Jerusalem_Post · 22,495 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
Israel War Live @IsraelWarLive · 30,707 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 6 September 2026
Documenting Israel @DocumentingIsrael · 20,430 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 September 2026
Israel Today @ILtoday · 33,018 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
Jewish Breaking News - JBN @JewishBreakingNewsTelegram · 39,139 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Real Mysteries @realmysteriesofficial · 19,781 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 27 September 2026
Abu Ali Express in English @englishabuali · 35,072 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Amir Tsarfati @beholdisraelchannel · 560,066 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Mannie's War Room @manniefabian · 23,955 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
Israel RealTime @Israel_Realtime_Updates · 19,682 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 September 2026
Israel com a Aline @israelcomaline · 28,665 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 September 2026
Viva Israel 🇮🇱 @israelviva · 19,282 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 September 2026
BubbaNews @bubbanews · 19,119 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 October 2026
David Diamond - Conferencista @DavidDiamond777 · 45,962 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
Sky News @SkyNews · 20,425 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 September 2026
Olive Tree Ministries - Jan Markell @olivetreeministry · 31,185 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
BBC News (World) @BBCWorld · 35,751 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
RealJackHibbs @jackhibbs · 50,862 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ILTV Israel News 24/7” (@ILTVnews), 44,691 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ILTVnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.