Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мои любимые песдюки

Channel

Мои любимые песдюки

@pezduks

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

98,686subscribers

-536 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001509769040
TypeChannel
Username@pezduks
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 October 2026
Measurements held52
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/pezduks

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

98,65299,36199,006.56 August 2026 — 99,222 subscribers6 August 2026 — 99,222 subscribers7 August 2026 — 99,230 subscribers8 August 2026 — 99,240 subscribers9 August 2026 — 99,200 subscribers10 August 2026 — 99,206 subscribers11 August 2026 — 99,217 subscribers12 August 2026 — 99,219 subscribers14 August 2026 — 99,212 subscribers15 August 2026 — 99,208 subscribers16 August 2026 — 99,203 subscribers17 August 2026 — 99,190 subscribers18 August 2026 — 99,188 subscribers19 August 2026 — 99,199 subscribers20 August 2026 — 99,189 subscribers22 August 2026 — 99,191 subscribers23 August 2026 — 99,163 subscribers25 August 2026 — 99,133 subscribers26 August 2026 — 99,113 subscribers27 August 2026 — 99,076 subscribers28 August 2026 — 99,102 subscribers29 August 2026 — 99,116 subscribers30 August 2026 — 99,117 subscribers31 August 2026 — 99,086 subscribers1 September 2026 — 99,070 subscribers2 September 2026 — 99,335 subscribers3 September 2026 — 99,361 subscribers5 September 2026 — 99,324 subscribers8 September 2026 — 99,256 subscribers11 September 2026 — 99,232 subscribers13 September 2026 — 99,220 subscribers15 September 2026 — 99,208 subscribers17 September 2026 — 99,198 subscribers19 September 2026 — 99,165 subscribers26 September 2026 — 99,043 subscribers4 October 2026 — 98,881 subscribers9 October 2026 — 98,809 subscribers13 October 2026 — 98,745 subscribers14 October 2026 — 98,692 subscribers15 October 2026 — 98,697 subscribers16 October 2026 — 98,681 subscribers17 October 2026 — 98,668 subscribers18 October 2026 — 98,652 subscribers19 October 2026 — 98,664 subscribers20 October 2026 — 98,670 subscribers21 October 2026 — 98,658 subscribers22 October 2026 — 98,666 subscribers23 October 2026 — 98,689 subscribers24 October 2026 — 98,676 subscribers25 October 2026 — 98,681 subscribers26 October 2026 — 98,672 subscribers27 October 2026 — 98,686 subscribers98,6866 August 202627 October 2026
52 measurements spanning 82 days, net -536. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 98,546–99,467 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Oct 2026, 13:2698,686+14
26 Oct 2026, 14:3598,672-9
25 Oct 2026, 17:0598,681+5
24 Oct 2026, 19:5898,676-13
23 Oct 2026, 21:1498,689+23
22 Oct 2026, 20:3698,666+8
21 Oct 2026, 19:3598,658-12
20 Oct 2026, 15:4998,670+6
19 Oct 2026, 13:0098,664+12
18 Oct 2026, 12:0898,652-16
17 Oct 2026, 11:0898,668-13
16 Oct 2026, 12:5798,681-16
15 Oct 2026, 14:4498,697+5
14 Oct 2026, 16:0998,692-53
13 Oct 2026, 08:0498,745-64
9 Oct 2026, 03:1798,809-72
4 Oct 2026, 13:3898,881-162
26 Sept 2026, 05:5799,043-122
19 Sept 2026, 08:0199,165-33
17 Sept 2026, 01:0099,198first reading

Engagement

190 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 174 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.5%
avg views ÷ 98,686 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,300
98 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
98
of 190 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026
Posts held190 (28 July 2026 – 26 October 2026)
Views total1,792,050
Reactions total166,192
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Oct 2026, 11:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 32s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

321,754 reactions across 190 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤209,46865.1%
🔥55,42717.2%
❤‍🔥24,6777.67%
😁11,8673.69%
🥰3,0980.963%
⚡2,9410.914%
💔2,6070.81%
😭2,5240.784%
💋2,3350.726%
🫡2,0110.625%
🦄1,4280.444%
🤩8750.272%
🤪8530.265%
😘7030.218%
💘6090.189%
😎3310.103%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 190 of the 190 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 321,754 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 190 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
315
across the posts below
Posts paid on
118
of 190 we hold a reading for · 62%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pezduks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 190 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 26 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Oct 2026, 17:17 UTC≈12,500 views171 reactionsread 26 October 2026
Photo

На завтра появилась пара окон в салоне, нужно срочно закрыть😋. Кто быстрее всех сэрегирует и запиписькается-тот получит 100 мл самой ништяковой в мире маски для роста в подарок и 10% скидулю на процедуру, хорошее настроение и рюмочку коньячка. Быренько надо только, а-то девки админы дрыхнуть хочуть уже💪 Запись: Телеграм - https://t.me/salon_SDR Вотсап - https://wa.me/79174416147

❤136❤‍🔥20🔥15

26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC≈17,100 views532 reactionsread 27 October 2026
Photo

Сейчас вы залипните, бхаха))))).. Очень прикольный симулятор забацали.. ставьте на х8.. 1 игра займет около 10-15 мин. https://1in8b.life

😁266❤145🔥77❤‍🔥17😭14💔7🤩6

25 Oct 2026, 18:49 UTC≈16,500 views1,929 reactions3 Starsread 27 October 2026

На самом деле заебала современная тенденция)).. напишешь что-то по делу, и начинается эта ущербная униженная и оскорбленная хуйня возражения)). А-ля: и что нам теперь с тощими лодыжками? Я на фото подобных дам тыкнула, там типичные нормостеники, никаких тощих лодыжек). Реально худые икры чаще всего у мужиков-астеников.. у женщин, даже тощеньких с икрами все ок зачастую). Нехороший признак после 50, когда они начинаю…

🔥871😁500❤434❤‍🔥53🤪45💋15⚡11

25 Oct 2026, 12:11 UTC≈14,700 views1,294 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

Прежде всего ей надо снова похудеть минимум на 10 кг. Но там, не только вес, а прежде всего отек, из-за зажатого таза. У мамы образовалась вальгусная стопа, ее не было год назад.. но можно сказать, что в этом возрасте, это больше инсулинорезистентность, и уже подагра. Положение стопы мозг уже очень плохо обслуживает.. от этого боль в пояснице появилась. Замедлились повороты тела, зрительная информация подсдала.. он…

❤917🔥265❤‍🔥112

25 Oct 2026, 11:39 UTC≈23,400 views1,531 reactionsread 27 October 2026
Photo

Сахар крови регулируют, учавствуют в обмене жиров, устойчивость дают при падении, отлично помогают сердцу и лимфатической системе). И спортом их не накачать так, как при жизни активной и при хорошем гормональном фоне. Не спортом надо заниматься, а жизнь свою активно организовывать), ибо в спорте все искусственно гипертрофируется, организму еще больше приходится тратить ресурсов на поддержание. Никогда спорт, даже 5-7…

❤1,110❤‍🔥193🔥192😭20⚡15💔1

25 Oct 2026, 11:15 UTC≈22,700 views2,043 reactions1 Starread 27 October 2026
Photo

Мышечные ноги вообще важнейший предиктор здоровья.. особенно, когда они мышечные без спорта силового. Да, развитые силовым спортом тоже хорошо выполняют свою функцию. Но если ноги мощные, а спорта нет, это значит, что хороший гормональный фон, хороший уровень здоровья. И в жизни человек достаточно активен без спорта, этой активности достаточно для поддержания мышц. Ноги у женщин должны быть мощные, это также хороший…

❤1,380😁350🔥233❤‍🔥37🤪29⚡14

25 Oct 2026, 10:56 UTC≈18,500 views1,771 reactionsread 27 October 2026
Photo

Вообще на самом деле очень хуёво много знать.. это, пожалуй, причиняет больше страданий, чем удовольствия.. и я вечно прошу жизнь доказать мне, что я ошибаюсь. Сейчас про голени.. про голени я уже писала в прошлом году.. это второе сердце(как минимум, и там помимо этого куча других ништяков).. крепкая плотная голень-хороший прогностический признак всегда в старческом возрасте. Посмотрите на голени дядьки Васьки в 75…

❤1,220💔351❤‍🔥137🔥58😭5

25 Oct 2026, 10:14 UTC≈18,400 views3,175 reactions5 Starsread 27 October 2026
Photo

Когда близкий человек умирает.. через время вы натыкаетесь будто на совершенно бессмысленные вещи: его очки, кружку, старый задрипанный халат, какую-то записку типа «купить молока».. голосовое на минуту, где он вообще несет бытовую хуйню претензиозным голосом))).. и именно от этой хрени почему-то разъебывает сильнее, чем от красивых фотографий на память, ибо истинная память о человеке состоит как раз из совершенно об…

❤2,090💔605❤‍🔥258😭128🔥71😘23

25 Oct 2026, 09:26 UTC≈19,000 views2,507 reactions4 Starsread 27 October 2026
Photo

Вывезла всех своих любимчиков в мой любимый отель. Стоило это просто как крыло от 🤪.. но, гляжу на их довольные мордени, и точно могу сказать, что это того стоило.. Потрясающая инвестиция в общую радость семьи. И вам и вашей семье желаю много радости, счастья и тепла на душе☺️

❤1,780🔥424❤‍🔥258🥰20💘12🤩8😁5

22 Oct 2026, 20:11 UTC≈3,580 views332 reactionsread 22 October 2026

Все деятели искусства 18-20 века, например, больные ублюдки… я об этом давно пишу.. но все такие: но они же такие талантливые и прекрасные))), хотя там и ублюдочное отношение к женам и детям.. а родителей своих, свершивших гораздо меньшую хуйню многие простить не могут.. но так и восхищаются этой творческой пиздобратией при этом.. они же талантливые типа… нахуй всю классику предлагаю упразднить… ибо писали ее реально…

❤207😁48⚡34🔥22🤪8❤‍🔥7💘6

22 Oct 2026, 20:00 UTC≈4,130 views394 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

Как надо мной издевались взрослые это вообще что-то запредельное.. Это просто дети своей эпохи.. так тогда было принято.. я тут не причем.. они не могли иначе.. а меня действительно много лупили.. и даже били половой тряпкой по лицу, и обзывали «заторможенной» и просили в саду остальных детей со мной не общаться.. но тогда они не могли иначе.. времена и нормы были другие.. никто из них ни в чем не виноват. Я это вс…

❤253🔥68❤‍🔥35💔25😭7⚡6

22 Oct 2026, 19:43 UTC≈4,620 views404 reactions1 Starread 22 October 2026

«Воспитывать аудиторию».. это вообще ни хуя про то, чтобы все аплодировали твоему образу мышления.. это, знаете, как про воспитание детей.. у меня детей много, я знаю.. они все такие выхуяриваются, сопротивляются моему образу мышления.. типа они боги, а я лохушка)). Вот здесь именно про качественное воспитание речь). Я же никогда не хочу воспитывать себе подобных, зачем жить мою жизнь)). Что-то от меня взяли и похуя…

❤‍🔥218❤123🔥47💘16

Showing the 12 most recent of 190 posts we hold for @pezduks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@pezduks edited 17 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 October 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мои любимые песдюки” (@pezduks), 98,686 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pezduks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.