Channel
@placemed
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
1,026,482subscribers
+88,247 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1002586585203 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @placemed |
| Description | Пишем о медиакультуре, трендах и маркетинге. Реклама: @maximillian Работаем с @Tgpodbor_official, @swaymedia, @Spiral_Yuri Регистрация в РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/6981b13f5346e541adeaf2d2 @alfapolo |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/placemed |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 1,026,482 | +6,723 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 1,019,759 | +4,632 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:13 | 1,015,127 | +2,983 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:14 | 1,012,144 | -1,804 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 1,013,948 | -2,708 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 1,016,656 | -1,167 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 1,017,823 | +870 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 1,016,953 | +1,925 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 1,015,028 | -3,397 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 1,018,425 | -1,661 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 1,020,086 | -1,637 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 1,021,723 | +13,521 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 1,008,202 | +5,473 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 1,002,729 | +5,710 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 997,019 | +6,518 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 990,501 | +4,059 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 986,442 | +9,226 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 977,216 | +10,179 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 967,037 | +14,855 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 952,182 | first reading |
202 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 202 (5 August 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,094,200 |
| Reactions total | 12,390 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Sept 2026, 14:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 56 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /103217 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC | 38 minutes – 68 minutes old | 4,400 views ~75 reactions | 60 minutes: 4,109 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 22 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /103207 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC | 647 minutes – 4.0 hours old | 8,710 views ~87 reactions | 60 minutes: 3,325 interp. → 3.0 hours: 6,820still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.6 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /103196 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC | 1823 minutes – 14 hours old | 13,300 views ~112 reactions | 60 minutes: 1,857 interp. → 3.0 hours: 2,640 → 6.0 hours: 3,630 → 12 hours: 11,200still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 8.6 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /103156 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC | 212.4 hours – 18 hours old | 14,600 views ~116 reactions | 3.0 hours: 5,189 interp. → 6.0 hours: 7,170 → 12 hours: 9,990still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 6.5 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
15,007 reactions across 202 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5337222581609074149 | 4,650 | 31.0% | |
| custom 5336943348605287859 | 4,152 | 27.7% | |
| 🤣 | 3,200 | 21.3% | |
| 😢 | 1,020 | 6.80% | |
| 🌚 | 864 | 5.76% | |
| 😁 | 829 | 5.52% | |
| 🎉 | 292 | 1.95% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 202 of the 202 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,007 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 202 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VSb5xKJnst | 1 | 10 August 2026 | 10 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 202 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🍕 Плюшевый хотДОГ сделал креатор soft_thumbnail: игрушка забавно обыгрывает название фирменного бутерброда с сосиской. Так и хочется откусить… 💎 place
custom 53369433486052878599🤣5custom 53372225816090741495🌚2😢1
♥️ Российский художник создал фарфорового продавца ЛАЙКОВ: персонажа, который буквально торгует лайками, подписчиками и комментариями. Автор работы Артемий Максимау сделал скульптуру из фарфора с золотом, кобальтом и люстром. Высота фигурки — 33 см. Лайкаем этого красавца. 💎 place
custom 533722258160907414924custom 533694334860528785917🤣6🌚3
♥️ Adidas выпустил бутсы по «Тачкам» — к 20-летию мультфильма бренд показал лимитированную коллекцию. В линейке две модели: красные в стиле Молнии Маккуина за $130 и «ржавые» в честь Мэтра за $110. Новинки уже появились в продаже. Нам срочно нужны такие. 💎 place
custom 533722258160907414930🤣22custom 53369433486052878594😁3
😂 Игральные карты с ЛЯГУШКАМИ завирусились в сети — необычную колоду продают за ~1600 рублей. Вместо привычных мастей чилийская художница Ungfio нарисовала жабок: они рыбачат на пики, летают на клеверах, а туз бубен превратили в огромную лягушачью тусовку. Теперь в дурака играть станет намного приятнее. 💎 place
custom 533722258160907414941custom 533694334860528785911🤣4😁2
💎 Котик с татуировкой его БЫВШЕЙ — на самом деле это просто генетика. Окрас кошек формируют сразу несколько генов, которые отвечают за цвет, пигмент и рисунок шерсти. Белые участки появляются там, где клетки, вырабатывающие пигмент, отсутствуют или не работают. Поэтому иногда на шерсти возникают очень необычные узоры — от сердечек до «татуировок» на лапах и боках. Милота. 💎 place
custom 533722258160907414968🤣28😢6🌚4😁4custom 53369433486052878592
😂 Костыль в виде АК-47: гениальный концепт сделал креатор strangecollabo. С таким бабуля точно защитит любую лавочку возле подъезда. 💎 place
🤣83custom 533694334860528785917custom 533722258160907414915😁7🌚4
😭 Так выглядит глаз горбатого КИТА вблизи — в 2024 году фотограф Рейчел Мур сняла крупным планом глаз самки горбатого кита у берегов Таити. На снимке хорошо виден его необычный глубокий синий цвет. Спустя всего два дня кит, которого называли Sweet Girl, погиб после столкновения со скоростным судном. Фотограф рассказала, что зрительный контакт с животным стал самым сильным моментом в её жизни, а этот кадр — памятью о…
😢65custom 533722258160907414922custom 53369433486052878598🌚4🤣2😁2
😂 Куртки-ПАНЕЛЬКИ сделали ребята из verlab — идеальная одежда для осени в любом спальном районе. Появилась коллекция курток с принтами, которые повторяют фасады типичных многоэтажек. Надел — и буквально слился с панелькой. Теперь можно быть самым незаметным человеком во дворе. 💎 place
custom 533722258160907414925custom 53369433486052878597🤣3
♥️ Сегодня воскресенье — это значит настало время выложить милого котика, любуйтесь:
custom 5337222581609074149122🤣17custom 53369433486052878599😁7
⚡️ Молния Маккуин выехал на трассу Формулы-1 в Италии: культовый герой «Тачек» проехал открывающий круг перед стартом гонки. Мечта миллионов детей (и взрослых) стала реальностью. 💎 place
custom 533722258160907414951😁20custom 533694334860528785910
😂 Курочки в ЖИЛЕТАХ напугали жительницу Испании: всё из-за фермера, который начал надевать на домашних кур мини-жилеты со светоотражающими полосками. Зимой там темнеет рано, и так птиц гораздо проще найти. Идея оказалась настолько необычной, что одна местная жительница приняла светящиеся силуэты за «бродящих гномов» и вызвала полицию. На месте выяснилось: никаких гномов — только курицы в модной экипировке. Не дай …
🤣72custom 533694334860528785915🌚8😁4custom 53372225816090741491
😂 Гениальные концепты спорткаров от bencu.studio. Какую выбираем? 💎 place
custom 533722258160907414938😢11custom 53369433486052878599🤣4🌚1
Showing the 12 most recent of 202 posts we hold for @placemed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@placemed edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Place” (@placemed), 1,026,482 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/placemed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.