😊 Gate Voyage wraps in Bali with a "platform for daily use" teaser 🔼 Gate records $79.6M in 24h net inflows - ranks #1 among all global CEXs 🔼 Gate's 24h open interest exceeds $12.47B - ranks among top 3 industry-wide 🔼 Gate launches Futures Points Airdrop Phase 144 - claim 0.016 QQQG or 100 USDT position vouchers per user 🔼 Gate Voyage kicks off in Bali - nearly 200 guests, partners and creators join sessions on ec…

Channel
Popcorn Today 🍿
@popcorn_today
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
2,708,038subscribers
-324,525 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002289627285 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @popcorn_today |
| Description | Your daily portion of popping crypto news! For partnerships and advertising inquiries, please fill out this form - https://forms.gle/Z68LPq8ge8UJgtvo6 📝 |
| Created | 3 October 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/popcorn_today |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 2,708,038 | -11,549 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 2,719,587 | -13,049 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 2,732,636 | -13,972 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:36 | 2,746,608 | -15,517 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 2,762,125 | -28,211 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 2,790,336 | -15,430 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:16 | 2,805,766 | -11,417 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:47 | 2,817,183 | -8,945 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:43 | 2,826,128 | -9,993 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 2,836,121 | -7,147 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 2,843,268 | -9,297 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 2,852,565 | -9,081 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 2,861,646 | -8,815 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 2,870,461 | -3,386 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 2,873,847 | -9,253 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 2,883,100 | -7,868 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 2,890,968 | -15,552 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 2,906,520 | -13,346 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 2,919,866 | -7,477 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:41 | 2,927,343 | first reading |
Engagement
10,849 posts held, back to 3 October 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4,606 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.129%
- avg views ÷ 2,708,038 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,490
- 410 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 410
- of 10,849 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10,849 (3 October 2024 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,430,280 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 03:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,040
- Videos
- ≈244
- Links
- ≈809
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 40s
- Average length
- 35s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 403 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 360 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 3.8 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 35.6% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 76.7% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 1,070 views — 0.04% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 1,450).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /1165419 Sept 2026, 17:03 UTC | 27 minutes – 42 minutes old | 215 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 15 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1165319 Sept 2026, 15:29 UTC | 56 minutes – 2.3 hours old | 546 viewsno reaction reading | 60 minutes: 336 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 40 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1165219 Sept 2026, 14:06 UTC | 724 minutes – 3.7 hours old | 710 viewsno reaction reading | 60 minutes: 293 → 3.0 hours: 656still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 77 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1165119 Sept 2026, 12:44 UTC | 106 minutes – 5.0 hours old | 835 viewsno reaction reading | 60 minutes: 274 interp. → 3.0 hours: 611 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.7 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1165019 Sept 2026, 11:16 UTC | 1329 minutes – 6.5 hours old | 967 viewsno reaction reading | 60 minutes: 303 interp. → 3.0 hours: 630 interp. → 6.0 hours: 922still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.9 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1164919 Sept 2026, 09:13 UTC | 1722 minutes – 8.5 hours old | 1,080 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 270 interp. → 3.0 hours: 651 → 6.0 hours: 931still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.4 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1164818 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC | 4111 minutes – 24 hours old | 37,500 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 252 interp. → 3.0 hours: 514 interp. → 6.0 hours: 717 → 12 hours: 945 → 24 hours: 37,500still climbing at last reading | 37,500measured | 14 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1164718 Sept 2026, 16:29 UTC | 4411 minutes – 25 hours old | 1,080 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 321 interp. → 3.0 hours: 495 → 6.0 hours: 617 → 12 hours: 726 → 24 hours: 1,070still climbing at last reading | 1,070measured | 3.8 hours |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Recent posts
😱 X is suing Bitcoin influencers for coordinating fake engagement across multiple accounts to fraudulently collect £207,384 in creator revenue Coordinated likes, reposts and identical content to game the algorithm Getting paid to post Bitcoin content and still had to cheat 😂
🏴☠️ Same hacker also hit SingularityNET - minted 260 million AGIX and 53.8 million WMTx tokens, total stolen now $16.7 million One hacker, three protocols, one day 😐
😲 ECB launched Pontes - a digital euro platform accessible only to banks Full public testing planned for mid-2027 Christine Lagarde blocked Binance's EU license and launched her own digital currency the same week 😂
🏴☠️ Fetch and Nunet hacked for $2 million combined - $1.53M in FET stolen, $462k in NTX minted and dumped NTX crashed 65% after the dump Not a day without a hack😭
Photo, posted without a caption
Posted without readable text
😑Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong called upcoming WSJ report false - says publication is blaming him for the CLARITY bill stall 🔼 Armstrong opposed the raw bill in January over issues with DeFi, tokenization, CFTC powers, and stablecoin rewards 🔼 After those points were fixed four months later, he supported the final version sent to the Senate Pre-emptively calling out the media before they even print the hit piece🙃
Photo, posted without a caption
🙂 iOS zero-click exploit chain lets hackers steal private keys and seed phrases - CISO urges immediate update ◽️ Uses malicious Safari page to trigger WebKit and JavaScriptCore vulnerabilities ◽️ Bypasses PAC and WebContent sandbox to escalate privileges to root ◽️ Steals keychain data and local crypto wallets silently Another day, another zero-day😢
😊 Strategy shares led Nasdaq-100 with a 48% gain over the last month Bitcoin's rise and Saylor's ongoing purchases are doing numbers Bitcoin proxy outperforms actual tech companies again 🚶♀️
😶 US national debt now exceeds 100% of GDP Bitcoin supply: still 21 million 😂
Showing the 12 most recent of 10,849 posts we hold for @popcorn_today. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@everythingcrypto24 · 24 postsLegit | News
@Legit_Lads · 411 postРозыгрыши Telegram premium Stars звезды
@NKLO80 · 41 postCrypto and Meme
@TheRealCryptoMeme · 41 postAirdrop for Vai/Brother
@dailyairdropmk · 71 postTelegram Premium ️
@freetgpremtg · 2071 postFree Tg premium & giveaways
@get_tg_premium_free · 41 postТГ Премиум Халва
@premium_halva · 1,2391 postРозыгрыши Telegram Stars
@premium_tgclub · 2,1101 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@BlumCryptoBot · 277,197103 posts📣 Mugshot Announcements
@mugshot_vet · 101,35920 posts💬 Mugshot Community
@mugshot_community · 100,16519 postsTradoor.io News - Trade Crypto With Leverage
@tradoor_io · 105,0123 postsTradoor Chat
@tradoor_io_chat · 34,4813 postsBlum: All Crypto – One App
@blumcrypto · 14,360,0012 postsPavel Durov
@durov · 10,721,3992 postsTON Station APP
@tonstationgames_bot · 72,5222 posts@blockstranding
@blockstranding · 701 postBlum Memepad
@blumcrypto_memepad · 2,658,7471 postBlum Trading Bot
@BlumCryptoTradingBot · 18,2681 postBums
@bums · 117,7181 postDEGENPHONE
@degenphone · 64,9041 postGamee
@gamee · 282,4341 postGold Fest: The Game
@goldfest_bot · 158,4091 postHumanity
@HumanityProt · 39,2341 postNotcoin
@notcoin_bot · 553,5641 postP A I N TRYING 🌷🙂
@PADHNEWALABACHA · 31 postquipnetwork
@quipnetwork · 221 postQzino App
@qzino_official_bot · 39,4241 postRep
@TON_Memelandia · 2071 postVOID
@VoidNotHereBot · 19,4251 postW-Coin
@wcoin_tapbot · 56,2221 postXeffy Community Bot
@Xeffy_Bot · 73,2041 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 10
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 10
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@popcorn_today named 10 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Domains linked from posts
208 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
2 of 208 shown as text only, not a link. The exact host, not merely a domain it shares a registrable root with, matches a threat-intelligence blocklist this register already checks elsewhere (see methodology) — the link still appearing in a post is still a measured fact and is still shown, but no anchor is rendered here, so no click and no link equity passes to it from this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Popcorn Today 🍿” (@popcorn_today), 2,708,038 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/popcorn_today.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.