گیاهان برای اینکه زنده بمونن ، باید به طریق صحیح دوست داشته بشن ! آدمام همینطور ؛ ما از لحظهی تولد ، به پدر و مادرمون متکی هستیم که دوستمون داشته باشن و زنده نگهمون دارن و اگر اونا محبت رو از طریق صحیح به ما نشون بدن ، ما انسانهای بهتری میشیم ... ~ ما تمامش میکنیم ~ کالین هوور 📕 @ppdfff

Channel
📗 PDF 📗
@ppdfff
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,503subscribers
-138 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001494731799 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ppdfff |
| Description | ادمین تهیه دوره ها @miladsh1992 تبلیغات 👇👇 https://t.me/joinchat/THmc7dAKbfMX4kAO |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ppdfff |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 25,503 | -13 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 25,516 | -12 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 25,528 | -10 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 25,538 | -11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 25,549 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 25,556 | -12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 25,568 | -12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 25,580 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 25,588 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 25,593 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 25,597 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 25,604 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 25,613 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 25,617 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:50 | 25,629 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 25,641 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 25,641 | first reading |
Engagement
122 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.53%
- avg views ÷ 25,503 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 645
- 122 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 122
- of 122 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 122 (1 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 78,670 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,820
- Videos
- ≈776
- Links
- ≈775
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 44m 51s
- Average length
- 2m 48s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
انسان همواره به خاطر رعایت ادب ، بیش از حد به دیگران میدان میدهد و آنها هم از این موضوع برای آزار دادن انسان استفاده میکنند ! ~ حیوان اندیشمند ~ روبر مرل
اندیشیدن به پایان هرچیز شیرینیِ حضورش را تلخ میکند ، بگذار پایان غافلگیرت کند ! درست مانند آغاز ... ~ پیکاسو 📕 @ppdfff
فرد عاقل و خردمند، چه زن چه مرد، زندگی خود را صرف تعقیب محبوبیت نمیکند. این سراب و امیدی واهی است. محبوبیت تعیین نمیکند چه چیزی درست یا پسندیده است، بلکه کاملا بر عکس محبوبیت نقش یکسان سازی و سقوط دهندگی بی صدا را دارد. خیلی بهتر است که در جستجوی ارزشها و اهداف خود باشیم. 📖درمان شوپنهاور 👤#اروین_د_یالوم
ای دل صبور باش و مخور غم که عاقبت این شام صبح گردد و این شب سحر شود. صبح بخیر زندگی 🌱
امیدوارم گاهی فرصتی هم برای خوشحال بودن داشته باشی، نه اینکه همیشه قوی باشی… و صبح بخیر …🌱
💟چگونه رزق و روزی بیحساب خدا را در زندگیمان جاری کنیم ❓ 🟣 چگونه از #کائنات درخواست کنیم❓ 🟣چگونه از #کائنات پاسخ مثبت بگیریم❓ #پاسخ #کائنات 💌🤔 "ناگفته های جذب" راز #کائنات در کانال زیر👇 https://t.me/+iP4uymU6bD0xNmZk https://t.me/+iP4uymU6bD0xNmZk #آرزوهاتو جذب کن 💚😳👆
📕 کتاب:حیوان اندیشمند ✍🏻 اثر: #روبر_مرل 📕 @ppdfff
📕 محدودیت صفر ✍🏻 #جو_وایتالی به طور خلاصه می توان گفت که کتاب محدودیت صفر در مورد بازگشت به وضعیت صفر است، جایی که هیچ چیزی وجود ندارد و همه چیز ممکن است. در این وضعیت هیچ فکر، حرف، عمل، خاطره، برنامه، باور یا چیز دیگری نیست، هیچ است و بس. 📕 محدودیت صفر ✍🏻 #جو_وایتالی 📕 @ppdfff
آنچه در درون آدم میمانَد، بینهایت بیشتر از آن چیزی است که به صورت کلمات بیرون میآید! 📙 #جوان_خام 👤 #فئودور_داستایفسکی 📕 @ppdfff
من و تو خوشبختیم هلنا چون ما فقط برای چیزی که هستیم عاشق همیم. میدانی چقدر کمیاب است! 📕 راز مادرم ✍ #جی_ال_ویتریک 📕 @ppdfff
این عکس رو هیچوقت دوست نداشتم منتشر کنم... چون یادآور روزهاییه که حتی برای سادهترین خواستههام هم پول کافی نداشتم. 💥💥سالها فکر میکردم مشکل از شانس، شرایط یا آدمهای اطرافمه...🥹 تا وقتی فهمیدم بزرگترین مانع، باورهایی بودن که هر روز توی ذهنم تکرار میشدن. همین کشف، مسیر زندگی من رو تغییر داد. اگر میخوای بدونی دقیقاً چه چیزی باعث این تغییر شد، وارد کانال «ذهن ثروتساز» شو. شاید فقط یک باور، بین زندگی امروزت …
Showing the 12 most recent of 122 posts we hold for @ppdfff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 539,852 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Asheghanbook · 13,5061 postBook 📖
@book_pdff · 23,5901 postعاشقان کتاب
@bookk_lovers · 27,2831 postبرایخورشید🌞
@brayekhorshid · 3731 postفرهنگ جاوید
@farhangejavid_pub · 1,2301 post@ketabfa
@ketsbfa · 1701 postمزدافر مؤمنی
@mazdafarr · 4,2311 postنواژه
@Nava_zhe · 2631 post🌙راز تولد | چارت، مدیتیشن و متافیزیک
@Raztavalod · 1,1601 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@StoryeKhas · 100,353
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 August 2026
@BooksCom · 63,138
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
@angizeshi75 · 121,001
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
@ketabnayyab · 89,229
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
@ketabdooni · 147,717
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📗 PDF 📗” (@ppdfff), 25,503 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ppdfff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.