Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПРИНЯЛ. ОТДАЛ

Channel

ПРИНЯЛ. ОТДАЛ

@priotdal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,970subscribers

+90 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001565557138
TypeChannel
Username@priotdal
Created5 September 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/priotdal

Growth

1,8751,9701,922.56 August 2026 — 1,880 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,880 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,881 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,883 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,882 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,875 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,889 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,893 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,925 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,927 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,967 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,970 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 30 days, net +90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,861–1,984 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 07:181,970+3
1 Sept 2026, 17:161,967+40
29 Aug 2026, 09:151,927+2
26 Aug 2026, 02:441,925+32
22 Aug 2026, 20:131,893+4
19 Aug 2026, 18:541,889+14
16 Aug 2026, 16:541,875-7
12 Aug 2026, 15:131,882-1
9 Aug 2026, 17:531,883+2
6 Aug 2026, 17:301,881+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:371,880no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:321,880first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
39s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

359 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8022.3%
😁6818.9%
💯5415.0%
🤣5314.8%
🔥298.08%
277.52%
🤯154.18%
🤡82.23%
🤪82.23%
🤬61.67%
👏51.39%
🙏30.836%
🆒10.279%
😢10.279%
😱10.279%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 424 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 23 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @priotdal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC189 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ФУТБОЛЬНЫЕ 🔴⚪️-ВЫХОДНЫЕ: * результаты обновляются онлайн 🗓 07 августа, пт, 17:00, 🏆 18 тур 🤝 Факел (16) - #СпартакМол (7) 1:1 _ 🗓 08 августа, сб, 09:00, 👶👶 19 тур Акрон (10) - #Спартак2011 (5) 🗓 08 августа, сб, 11:30, 👶👶 19 тур Акрон (7) - #Спартак2010 (5) 🗓 08 августа, сб, 14:00, 👶👶19 тур Акрон (15) - #Спартак2009 (13) _ 🗓 09 августа, вс, 14:00, 🟢 18 тур Череповец (7) - #Спартак2 (12) 🗓 09 августа, вс, 20:00,

1

6 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC452 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Посещаемость 1 тура Пути РПЛ Кубка России: 🔵🔵 30 277 🔴🔵 23 667 🟢🟢 20 017 🟢🟠 19 982 🔵🔵 7 906 🔵🔷 5 455 🔵🔴 2 203 🔴🟡 1 433 Среднее по Пути РПЛ (в будни): 13 868 чел/матч Среднее по РПЛ (в выходные): 12 080 чел/матч Вводите фанайди, там люди на футбол ходят! 🚀принял.отдал

🤯8😁4

6 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC471 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Красную Миши ИГНАТОВА отменили. И правильно.

👍53

6 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC565 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Да начнётся битва ДАКУ vs ДАНУ! 2026 год: ДАКУ - 0 игр, 0 голов, 0 голевых за "Спартак" ДАНУ - 15 игр, 5 голов, 1 голевая за #СпартакМол 🚀принял.отдал

🔥23😁14🤪8🤡2

6 Aug 2026, 06:57 UTC588 views19 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Кубок (особенно в его нынешнем формате) это прежде всего проверка резерва. А лучше - молодых. А ещё лучше - своих. И то, что основное впечатление от вчерашнего матча "Спартака" - это игра Полеха, тому следствие. Однако Паша вышел лишь на последние 15 минут при комфортном счёте 3:0. Поэтому считаю, что в данной игре "фастрек" если и был, то лишь поздним "шорт-треком". Вообще, лидеры РПЛ на удивление решили не особо п

👍142🤯2🤬1

5 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC656 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Чем мне импонирует Паша ПОЛЕХ - это тем, что у него всегда поднята голова. Светлая голова, во всех смыслах. 🚀принял.отдал

👍41😁6🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC711 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Самое грациозное в истории пересечение финишной ленточки. 🚀принял.отдал

🤣356🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC614 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну, отведите вы уже Угальде в церковь!!! upd: не благодарите;)

8🙏3

5 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC627 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«ЧТО ПО ТЕЛИКУ»? 27.07-02.08, Россия, 4+ (137,3 млн чел.) 🗣 Единственная игра РПЛ, да ещё и "Спартак" - безусловное первое место (отрыв в 2 раза) среди трансляций за неделю. На 3 месте - студия после игры "Спартака". Потешный Путь Кубка России с "популярнейшими" медиакомандами - не популярен. 🗣 Эта неделя отдана верхнему пути Кубка: 5 игр на основном канале, в т.ч. "Спартак" с "Оренбургом" сегодня в 18:30. 🗣 РПЛ н

3

4 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC621 views5 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

34 ЛУЧШИЕ КОМАНДЫ РОССИИ ⚫️️ "Спартак" и "Краснодар" пока без потерь, но им играть между собой в следующем туре. Про календарь "Зенита" мы с вами помним. А вот Махачкала Вадима ЕВСЕЕВА поражает - две волевые победы, а ведь дальше предстоит визит в Петровский парк. ⚫️ ЦСКА стартует с 5(!) подряд домашних игр, но уже с потерями (очко увезла Самара). У "Локомотива" и "Динамо" вообще по 1 баллу. РПЛ после 2 тура: ме

👍41

4 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC≈1,350 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Средняя посещаемость игр Кубка России на домашнем стадионе "Спартака" (без фанайди): 22/23 - 7 930 23/24 - 15 611 24/25 - 22 234 25/26 - 33 044 (лучшие в сезоне) 🚀принял.отдал

👏5🤯5

4 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC647 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

И снова вспоминается мой разговор с одним из депутатов, принимавших закон о фанайди: - Скажите, ЗАЧЕМ вы ввели фанайди? - Ну, его оформить быстро и удобно. После новостей о введении паспорта болельщика на играх Кубка России снова первым делом возникает тот же вопрос. И, кажется, я знаю тот же ответ. 🚀принял.отдал

🤡6😁3

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @priotdal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПРИНЯЛ. ОТДАЛ” (@priotdal), 1,970 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/priotdal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.