Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for جستاری در حقوق خصوصی

Channel

جستاری در حقوق خصوصی

@privatelawiran1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,551subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001460183679
TypeChannel
Username@privatelawiran1
Created29 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/privatelawiran1

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5441,5511,547.56 August 2026 — 1,545 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,545 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,546 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,547 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,544 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,547 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,548 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,551 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 43 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,543–1,552 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:591,551+3
14 Sept 2026, 12:191,548+1
30 Aug 2026, 04:141,547+3
20 Aug 2026, 21:061,544-3
17 Aug 2026, 10:461,547+1
13 Aug 2026, 14:381,546+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:451,545no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:451,545first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5785.1%
👎68.96%
😱45.97%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2024 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC432 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @harfagencyPhoto

⚖مقاله حقوق فناوری 🇪🇺 آغاز فصل جدید قانون‌گذاری‌ها برای فضای سایبر؛ با تأکید بر قانون خدمات دیجیتال اتحادیۀ اروپا 📜 نویسندگان: ✍️ رویا معتمدنژاد 🎓 دانشیار دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی ✍️ شیوا شکرالهی 🎓 پژوهشگر دکتری حقوق عمومی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی 📇 دوفصلنامه حقوق فناوری‌های نوین (دانشگاه علم و فرهنگ) 🗓️ دوره ۷، شماره ۱۳ - بهار و تابستان ۱۴۰۵. 📌 این مقاله به بررسی یکی از مهم‌ترین تحولات ح…

Signed Afshin Azizi

17 Jul 2026, 15:27 UTC449 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

همکاران عزیز در صورتیکه دادنامه ای در اختیار دارید که دعوی به دلیل ایراد شکلی رد شده است ممنون‌ می شوم جهت یک کار پژوهشی در پی وی ارسال فرمایید. @hamidnorouzi71

👍2

Signed Hamid Norouzi

4 Dec 2025, 21:07 UTC≈1,200 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Instagram.com/lexpath_edu برگزاری دوره های مهارت افزایی ویژه وکلا در شیراز و جنوب کشور برای اطلاع به صفحه اینستاگرام ما بپیوندید

👍2

Signed Hamid Norouzi

7 Jul 2025, 10:29 UTC≈1,860 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

با توجه به انلاین بودن، حضور برای همه ازاد است

Signed Hamid Norouzi

10 Aug 2024, 14:46 UTC≈4,390 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

کتابی جدید در زمینه تاریخ اندیشه حقوقی به زیور طبع آراسته گردید، در این حیطه از اندیشه پیش از این دو کتاب به چاپ رسیده بود. اولی کتاب اندیشه‌های حقوقی اثر فیلیپ مالوری با ترجمه مرتضی کلانتریان و دومی کتاب تاریخ مختصر تئوری حقوقی اثر جان کلی با ترجمه دکتر محمد راسخ. کسانی که تاریخ اندیشه و فلسفه را دنبال می‌کنند به نیکی می‌دانند که "تاریخ اندیشه" در هر حیطه از دانش چقدر دارای اهمیت است و شناخت سیر اندیشه‌ها کمک می‌کن…

👍5👎1

Signed Hamid Norouzi

16 Jul 2024, 17:00 UTC≈3,510 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

چند نکته برای خودمان حقوقدانان ما چگونه حقوق را می‌فهمند؟ آیا آثار و نتایجِ توجه به آکسیوم‌های حقوقی بر اجتماع را می‌توانیم فهم کنیم؟ جایگاه حقوق در فضای سیاسی ما چیست؟ حقوق ماهیت سیاسی دارد یا سیاست باید شکلی حقوقی داشته باشد؟ حقوق تکنیک و فنی است در اختیار حکمرانان تا صورتی حقوقی به فرمان‌های خود ببخشند؟ یا اینکه حقوق(نه قانون) باید به انقیاد در بیاورد حکمران را؟ چرا برخی از متفکران(چپ نو) از جمله مایک سندل، چالر…

👍9

Signed Hamid Norouzi

23 Jun 2024, 12:23 UTC≈3,380 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

امکان سنجی شرط رجوع از وقف در فقه مذاهب اسلامی سعید زین الدینی دانشجوی دکتری، گروه حقوق خصوصی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. علی اسلامی پناه. استادیار،گروه حقوق خصوصی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران وقف یکی از سنت‌های حسنه‌ای است که قدمتی به طول تاریخ دارد و در تمامی ادیان به عنوان نهادی که ریشه در صفات اخلاقی و انسانی داشته و دارای تاثیر به سزایی در مسائل مختلف اجتماعی بوده شناخته می‌شود.با ا…

👍2

Signed Hamid Norouzi

21 Jun 2024, 09:05 UTC≈2,140 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ترجمه فارسی همین کتاب من این ترجمه را مطالعه و تورق نکرده‌ام، امیدوارم نویسنده دقت و تسلط کافی نسبت به انتقال مفاهیم را بکار برده باشد. به هر روی مطالعه‌ی نسخه اصلی یا ترجمه فارسی اکیداً توصیه می‌گردد.

Signed Hamid Norouzi

21 Jun 2024, 09:05 UTC≈2,050 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

Joseph Raz: The Concept Of Legal Seystem: Oxford 1970 مفهوم نظام حقوقی جوزف رَز که Jewish است، یکی از مهم‌ترین فیلسوفان حقوقی معاصر شناخته می‌شود و نویسنده و مؤلف یازده کتاب است. او اولین کتاب خود «مفهوم نظام حقوقی» را بر اساس تز دکترایش نگاشت. رَز را در زمره‌ی پوزیتویست‌های حقوقی می‌دانند، وی یکی از برجسته ترین شاگردان هربرت هارت است. نسخه‌ی اصلی کتاب در اختیار شما قرار داده می‌شود، متوجه شدم که سابقاً این کتاب …

Signed Hamid Norouzi

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @privatelawiran1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ندای قانون وقضا| اخبار و آموزش حقوق
@nedayeqanoon · 42,287
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
کانال جامع آزمون وکالت 1405
@hoqoq99 · 35,623
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
کانال تست رابین هود
@testerobinhood · 83,498
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
حقوق خصوصی
@hoghough_khososi · 38,619
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
احمد غفوری کانال اصلی
@ghafooriasli · 57,626
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“جستاری در حقوق خصوصی” (@privatelawiran1), 1,551 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/privatelawiran1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.