Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Proof - Get Free Bitcoin ๐ŸŽ

Channel

Proof - Get Free Bitcoin ๐ŸŽ

@proof_get_free_bitcoin

On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Also posting the same content ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

10,005subscribers

-479 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ€“31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001557711021
TypeChannel
Username@proof_get_free_bitcoin
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/proof_get_free_bitcoin

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 31% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegramโ€™s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts โ€” open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@proof_get_free_bitcoin/19401 ยท this entry6 Aug 2026, 22:36 UTC@Bxitcoin/30137 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC1.0016 hours
@proof_get_free_bitcoin/19403 ยท this entry7 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC@Bxitcoin/30157 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC1.0010 hours
@proof_get_free_bitcoin/19404 ยท this entry7 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC@Bxitcoin/30167 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC1.008.3 hours
@proof_get_free_bitcoin/19405 ยท this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC@Bxitcoin/30177 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC1.002.9 hours
@proof_get_free_bitcoin/19406 ยท this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC@Bxitcoin/30187 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC1.0036 minutes
@proof_get_free_bitcoin/19407 ยท this entry7 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC@Bxitcoin/30407 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC1.003.6 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Bxitcoin11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.2 hoursthis entry (11โ€“0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp โ€” in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

โ€œPublished firstโ€ means first in this corpus. We hold 33 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detectorโ€™s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @proof_get_free_bitcoin โ€” which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ€” we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channelโ€™s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable โ€” 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times โ€” 60%, no better than a coin flip โ€” because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channelโ€™s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying โ€” a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story โ€” and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

10,00510,48410,244.57 August 2026 โ€” 10,484 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 10,480 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 10,467 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 10,453 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 10,439 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 10,424 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 10,408 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 10,397 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 10,381 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 10,364 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 10,344 subscribers18 August 2026 โ€” 10,326 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 10,307 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 10,296 subscribers21 August 2026 โ€” 10,283 subscribers22 August 2026 โ€” 10,262 subscribers24 August 2026 โ€” 10,232 subscribers25 August 2026 โ€” 10,201 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 10,185 subscribers27 August 2026 โ€” 10,180 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 10,169 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 10,148 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 10,135 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 10,122 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 10,101 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 10,091 subscribers3 September 2026 โ€” 10,072 subscribers4 September 2026 โ€” 10,057 subscribers7 September 2026 โ€” 10,005 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 32 days, net -479. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 9,933โ€“10,556 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 22:1910,005-52
4 Sept 2026, 22:0010,057-15
3 Sept 2026, 06:2610,072-19
1 Sept 2026, 22:2610,091-10
1 Sept 2026, 00:3610,101-21
30 Aug 2026, 22:3610,122-13
30 Aug 2026, 01:5810,135-13
29 Aug 2026, 03:2410,148-21
28 Aug 2026, 05:0610,169-11
27 Aug 2026, 07:2610,180-5
26 Aug 2026, 09:4410,185-16
25 Aug 2026, 10:3410,201-31
24 Aug 2026, 07:4410,232-30
22 Aug 2026, 15:1610,262-21
21 Aug 2026, 05:2410,283-13
20 Aug 2026, 07:5610,296-11
19 Aug 2026, 10:3610,307-19
18 Aug 2026, 12:2810,326-18
17 Aug 2026, 14:3410,344-20
16 Aug 2026, 07:5410,364first reading

Engagement

243 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
0.32%
avg views รท 10,005 subscribers
Avg views / post
32.0
178 posts measured
Reaction rate
โ€”
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
178
of 243 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held243 (5 August 2026 โ€“ 29 August 2026)
Views total5,703
Reactions totalโ€”
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC3 viewsread 29 August 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1q8507mqc9tkc76exlha3tu85qtwv3mav89nl5gu ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.0021 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: fcf19db76e6a34f5caeb1f200bae2983cf80f950e8d3ba9f2604fa519c02ab6b

28 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC11 viewsread 29 August 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: 13JBG9MVtgny8q57jiVh9fuS29hAJowdw6 ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.001625 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: e5347bf9877ccb84e5c01f15a2b6a3a1c8efe2548818cb418f1965ba693b0f1a

28 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC17 viewsread 29 August 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1q0ujun3pnav7uf50kjkhlr8k23296an9kwy4jqe ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.001556 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: c23cfccd01c329e822baf9a28761dce7239d0c2211ecc859e5c7300db8f51a1d

28 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC21 viewsread 29 August 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1q7qds29gh58f8yv92nycg2ulevlmr94zhuz7v7d ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.001511 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: c01c1f99639d46291dc58130bebd21a866dbf46385b305db35281d9a31b846aa

28 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC28 viewsread 29 August 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1q5aatqfg4pjaw4wkk46ayqkd7mg4n2auyf73662 ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.001027 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: 9cabb6c92683708bf798ed667546087a983f031ae1ad121b0ffe82ce420159e4

28 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC32 viewsread 29 August 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1qscsalv8fe748gts5ujzv2kkprxteyycv6k4pdt ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.001138 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: 70a145e31931f69469918697bf7257eb2d71993aebe3916db5c56b39119a7bda

28 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTC42 viewsread 29 August 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: 1KHKTo4QbZYFCrhrMewKcZEatVtUyN6S6d ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.001489 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: 8346003a547c050fa32ff838a80ba0d862af8ce5a706c92beb40b3e5c8e49661

27 Aug 2026, 23:35 UTC42 viewsread 29 August 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1qhrax5wuhfvrphp5we64688r9lj8vavz7m4qldn ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.001027 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: 48d9ceaf8f2126ee9d9a406c300faf96be368d30a53985a20fd8d707ead1ec0f

27 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTC43 viewsread 29 August 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: 32JFs7GnkAG2xEEvSWcxHXKu8pjBbRNfbM ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.002501 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: 34ea3ce0c32b39c574bc001180a6f8bc02db17db33877c353a0648806b80386a

27 Aug 2026, 21:28 UTC41 viewsread 29 August 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1qwpw9u6dwx46k2zln4ahwwn5nd7h45wv2xghgl6 ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.0013 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: 04be9cda3f84c06df4981cd260c56f381929043e63459325acf371e88e4dde80

27 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC39 viewsread 29 August 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1qfugztcxztxklfyh84v9jqty3uvvlhflrf6nyu6 ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.00124 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: 558bf71efe4700563e2276e918667853aca85648d828efc6e7951c0984746e95

27 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC41 viewsread 29 August 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1q435dz4052wzacsnj2kqxps2fgyqeqxlf3l5acc ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.00245 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: 5f5a1cd5e0abcf5757731c93ea829edd8d90ef744b747152830bd51475378d9b

Showing the 12 most recent of 243 posts we hold for @proof_get_free_bitcoin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Payment - BTC ads
@earnbtcbywatchingads ยท 38,863
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 35 here โ€” alongside 34 others โ€” read 30 August 2026
BDWIN 24๐Ÿšฆ๐†๐€๐Œ๐„ 69โ„ข ๐•๐ˆ๐ ๐†๐‘๐Ž๐”๐ ๐Ÿ“Š
@riham69team ยท 29,544
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 37 here โ€” alongside 36 others โ€” read 8 September 2026
TRONXO
@tronxomine ยท 51,022
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 50 here โ€” alongside 49 others โ€” read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œProof - Get Free Bitcoin ๐ŸŽโ€ (@proof_get_free_bitcoin), 10,005 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proof_get_free_bitcoin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.