Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Просто о BIM

Channel

Просто о BIM

@prostobim

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,978subscribers

+74 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001410587829
TypeChannel
Username@prostobim
Created15 July 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/prostobim

Growth

8,8898,9788,933.56 August 2026 — 8,904 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,904 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,889 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,902 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,906 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,921 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,931 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,940 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,954 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,955 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,954 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,978 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 31 days, net +74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,876–8,991 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 17:018,978+24
2 Sept 2026, 11:538,954-1
30 Aug 2026, 16:048,955+1
28 Aug 2026, 00:268,954+14
25 Aug 2026, 05:118,940+9
21 Aug 2026, 18:188,931+10
18 Aug 2026, 15:228,921+15
15 Aug 2026, 19:438,906+4
12 Aug 2026, 19:448,902+13
9 Aug 2026, 11:518,889-15
6 Aug 2026, 10:178,904no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:558,904first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 8,978 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,390
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.713%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held27 (7 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total12,486
Reactions total89
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

343 reactions across 23 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9026.2%
👍6418.7%
😁5516.0%
257.29%
💯195.54%
🤣154.37%
🥴154.37%
👎123.50%
🤔82.33%
🌭51.46%
👀51.46%
👏51.46%
💊51.46%
🆒30.875%
💅30.875%
🫡30.875%
👨‍💻20.583%
👻20.583%
🗿20.583%
10.292%
4 further kinds41.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 343 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC786 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Приглашаем спикеров на ТИМ/BIM завтрак: «Прохождение экспертизы ТИМ/BIM-моделей» 5 сентября в 11:00 Tiver Group совместно с Анной Быковой (LEGkO BIM) проводит ТИМ/BIM завтрак, посвященный нашей любимой теме: прохождение экспертизы ТИМ/BIM-моделей. Мероприятие пройдет сразу на трех площадках с параллельной трансляцией: 📍 Москва, МГСУ 📍 Санкт-Петербург, ГАСУ 💻 Онлайн в Zoom Мы ищем спикеров. Если вы прошли экспертиз

👍1

26 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC≈1,040 views0 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#ИИ на хайпе ИИ 27.08 (чт) в 10:00 (мск) BIMIT проведет вебинар, на котором продемонстрирует свои ИИ-инструменты для работы с BIM-моделями. Что будет на вебинаре? 1. Как устроен ИИ-инструмент 2. Применение ИИ в разных сегментах 3. IFCQL: технологическая основа работы ИИ с ЦИМ 4. ИИ + ЦИМ: практический сценарий работы 5. Дорожная карта по развитию ИИ-инструмента 6. Ответы на вопросы Участие бесплатное, требуется р

24 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC≈1,420 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026

#ИИ Тестирую проверку проектной документации с помощью ИИ. Результат мне нравится. Надо тестить на реальных проектах вместе с экспертами. YouTube VK видео Для этого написал десктоп приложение, которое работает вместе с SIGNAL DOCS и OpenAi. Пробовал использовать отечественные нейронки, у них пока нет модуля зрения. А QWEN не смог работать с PDF напрямую, потребует самим настраивать пайплайн по распознанию, чем в п

🔥11👍41💅1

14 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC≈1,700 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @protimruPhoto

🔥 НОВЫЙ ВЫПУСК ПОДКАСТА «В ГОСТЯХ У PRO ТИМ»! Друзья, встречайте 19-й выпуск нашего подкаста! Мы продолжаем погружаться в мир цифровизации строительства, и сегодня у нас в гостях один из самых ярких экспертов отрасли. 🎙 Гость выпуска — Пётр Манин Эксперт в области цифрового строительства, директор по развитию бизнеса ПГС компании «Нанософт», член технического комитета ТК 505. Пётр — признанный специалист по внедре

4🫡3🆒1

14 Aug 2026, 07:43 UTC≈1,570 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#Ссылки Посмотрел «Индекс инновационности девелоперов 2026» от Сколково / Build UP. Работа большая и полезная, но к методике у меня есть вопросы. Они всегда будут в подобных случаях, но это не означает, что их не надо проговорить. Верхняя часть рейтинга в целом действительно собрана из сильных по цифровизации девелоперов. Но если смотреть на конкретные места, появляются странности. Например, ПИК и Самолет оказались

👍5🔥5💯3🥴2🏆1🤷‍♀1

13 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC≈1,380 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🏗 100+ TechnoBuild 2026 — встречаемся в Екатеринбурге! С 29 сентября по 2 октября в «Екатеринбург-Экспо» пройдет один из крупнейших строительных форумов России — 100+ TechnoBuild. В программе — более 200 деловых секций, BIM-форум, темы городской среды и недвижимости, архитектурные лекции и большая выставка площадью 40 000 м². Хорошая возможность посмотреть, чем сегодня живет строительная отрасль, обсудить цифровиза

6

12 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC≈1,390 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#ИИ В последнее время активно тестирую ИИ для проверки проектной документации и внедряю этот функционал в SIGNAL DOCS. Главный вывод: ИИ пока не заменяет эксперта, но уже хорошо его усиливает. По оценкам экспертов, с которыми я общался, нейронка в лучшем случае находит около 20% тех замечаний, которые находит человек. Но при этом регулярно обнаруживает дополнительные ошибки, которые эксперт пропустил. И проблема н

👍9🔥4💯21👨‍💻1

11 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC≈2,150 views22 reactionsread 28 August 2026

#ГосТИМ Три года цифровизации исполнительной документации. К чему это было? С 2023 года регионы начали издавать приказы о ведении исполнительной документации в электронном виде. Фактически генподрядчиков на госконтрактах обязали покупать специализированное ПО. Одним из ключевых требований стала передача документов в ИСУП, в том числе по утвержденным Минстроем XML-схемам. Но возникла интересная ситуация: интеграция

💯10🔥5👏4👻2😁1

11 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC≈1,050 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @ROSECO_BIMPhoto

📊 Приглашаем инженеров-проектировщиков принять участие в опросе 2026 года ROSECO продолжает исследование удалённой работы и инженерного фриланса, начатое в 2023 году. Ранее в нём приняли участие 287 специалистов, в 2024 году — 372. Новый опрос поможет оценить изменения на рынке: количество заказов и стоимость работ, применение ИИ, навыки будущего, работу распределённых команд и предпочтительный формат занятости. ⏱

👍1

7 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC≈1,550 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @ModPlusNewsPhoto

#ModPlus С ДНЕМ СТРОИТЕЛЯ! Профессиональный праздник — отличный повод сделать себе подарок, который точно пригодится в работе! Получите скидку 50% на подписку по промо-коду ModPlusBuilder2026! Акция действует с 7 по 14 августа 2026. Если вы давно планировали интегрировать ModPlus в рабочие процессы вашей компании — сейчас самое время. Упростите рутину, ускорьте процессы и повысьте эффективность своей команды!

🔥11

7 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

BIMIT запускает праздничный розыгрыш ко Дню строителя! 🎉 Для участия в розыгрыше заполните короткую форму — и вы в игре. Дальше остаётся только следить за новостями в канале 🏆 Главный приз — полный доступ к платформе BIMIT (3 месяца) плюс консультация специалиста. 🎁 Приятный бонус для всех участников: онлайн‑разбор «проблемной» IFC модели. Для этого можно отправить модель в формате IFC — разработчик обработает её

6 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC≈2,020 views68 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#SIGNAL Вышло видео на Россия24 со мной в передаче "Есть решение". Ну там еще другие известные участники были. Самое забавное, что даже в Экзон для демонстрации BIM-моделей используют SIGNAL) И у Минстроя можно посмотреть в канале https://t.me/minstroyrf/25020 Всех с наступающим праздником!

🔥40🥴11👍8😁6💅1💊1🗿1

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @prostobim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jul 2026, 07:23 UTCAnonymous Poll372 voters

Что вы делаете, когда попадаете на ИИ-бота в чате поддержки или в звонке?

  1. Продолжаю решать с его помощью свою проблему14%
  2. Прошу позвать оператора68%
  3. Прекращаю общение и ищу другие каналы связи13%
  4. Посмотреть результаты5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Проектирование зданий
@prozru · 43,664
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Просто о BIM” (@prostobim), 8,978 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prostobim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.