Цифровые сервисы жилищного строительства и рынка недвижимости предлагают сделать единым контуром 👥 Такую идею предложили эксперты Ассоциации цифровых платформ. Предполагается, что будет создан отраслевой контур данных по всей жилищной сфере. Сейчас сведения об объектах и правах распределены по разным реестрам и системам, из-за чего у граждан растут издержки при покупке жилья или строительстве. 📄 Единый контур позво…

Channel
Цифровое строительство
@digitalbuild
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,087subscribers
-1,733 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001535160233 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @digitalbuild |
| Description | Все про технологии в строительстве Предложить новость @Faina_Filina Номер РКН 4796325734 |
| Created | 17 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 39 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/digitalbuild |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 20:16 | 24,087 | -10 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 08:58 | 24,097 | -23 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 05:20 | 24,120 | -46 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 01:01 | 24,166 | -212 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 24,378 | -8 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:42 | 24,386 | -10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 24,396 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 24,399 | -64 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 24,463 | -32 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 24,495 | -22 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:36 | 24,517 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:56 | 24,527 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:46 | 24,537 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:35 | 24,546 | -13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 24,559 | -21 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 24,580 | +17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 24,563 | +4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 24,559 | -34 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 24,593 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 24,605 | first reading |
Engagement
159 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.1%
- avg views ÷ 24,087 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,430
- 68 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.111%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 68
- of 159 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 67 of 68 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 159 (24 July 2026 – 14 October 2026) |
| Views total | 165,553 |
| Reactions total | 180 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Oct 2026, 15:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,520
- Videos
- ≈545
- Links
- ≈3,770
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 28m 06s
- Average length
- 46s
Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
542 reactions across 150 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 250 | 46.1% | |
| 🔥 | 64 | 11.8% | |
| ❤ | 37 | 6.83% | |
| 🤪 | 32 | 5.90% | |
| 🤝 | 29 | 5.35% | |
| 👀 | 22 | 4.06% | |
| 🆒 | 17 | 3.14% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 3.14% | |
| 😁 | 17 | 3.14% | |
| 🙏 | 15 | 2.77% | |
| 💯 | 14 | 2.58% | |
| ⚡ | 13 | 2.40% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 1.48% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 1.29% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 156 of the 159 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 565 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 159 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 14 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 159 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @digitalbuild. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 159 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 14 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
В Новой Зеландии ТИМ помогли расширить железнодорожную сеть подземным участком 🇳🇿В Окленде дополнили существующую железнодорожную сеть подземным участком City Rail Link. Здесь добавили две подземные станции и два параллельных тоннеля протяженностью 3,45 км. Теперь железная дорога сможет обслуживать до 54 тыс. пассажиров в час. 🚇 В процессе строительства более 500 информационных моделей объединили в единую модель, ч…
👏1
В России провели 34 сделки с недвижимостью при помощи биометрии 🏙 34 сделки с недвижимостью с использованием технологии биометрии заключили в России с 1 июля, сообщает Росреестр. 👁 Первыми участниками стали жители Самарской области. 👥 Граждане обратились в Росреестр через личный кабинет на портале Госуслуг для регистрации перехода права собственности на квартиру в Самаре. 🌟 Для этого продавец и покупатель использ…
🔥1
«Ценность ИИ создает система внедрения, а не сам инструмент» 👤 Андрей Яшанов, технический директор «Генпро», на 100+ TechnoBuild представил опыт внедрения искусственного интеллекта в процессы проектирования. 🧲 Опыт перехода на ТИМ показал, что купить программу недостаточно. Результат появляется только тогда, когда вместе с новым инструментом выстраиваются стандарты, обучение и цифровые процессы. С искусственным инт…
👍1
Количество онлайн-заявлений в столичный Росреестр побило показатели 2025 года 📁 Речь идет о сентябре 2026 года. Специалисты Росреестра за это время приняли 170,7 тыс. электронных заявлений. 📃 Это — документы на регистрацию прав и постановку на кадастровый учет объектов недвижимости. 🗓️ Всего в январе-сентябре 2026 года поступило более 1,25 млн электронных заявлений. Это на 5,5% больше, чем за 2025 год. Цифровое …
👍1
Модель погоды предсказывает срок службы низкоуглеродного бетона 🏢 Исследователи ETH Zurich для составления прогноза применили локальные погодные данные. Подход должен поддержать применение низкоуглеродного бетона, который карбонизируется быстрее традиционного, ускоряя коррозию арматуры. Три смеси испытали в: ➖ Цюрихе (Швейцария) ➖ Бергене (Норвегия) ➖ Манаусе (Бразилия) ➖ Хуайлайе (Китай) 🌦 Модель симулировала кол…
👍1🤪1
Эксперты на 100+ TechnoBuild обсудили, как привлечь молодежь в строительство 👥 В ходе дискуссии «Цифровые технологии в строительном образовании» участники обсуждения сошлись во мнении, что строительной отрасли нужен новый образ. 👷♂ Современный специалист работает не только с традиционными инструментами, но и с планшетом, цифровыми моделями и программным обеспечением. 🤖 По мнению участников, технологии помогут уйт…
🔥2
Минтруд РФ добавил ТИМ и ИИ-нормоконтроль в профессиональные стандарты проектировщиков ✅️ Ведомство утвердило два актуализированных профессиональных стандарта для специалистов в области архитектурно-строительного проектирования. 👥 В новой редакции стандартов указаны требования к цифровым компетенциям проектировщиков. В стандартах прописаны работа с информационными моделями зданий (ТИМ), с машиночитаемыми данными и …
🔥1
ЦИМ предлагают закрепить в Градостроительном кодексе 👥 Правительство РФ внесло в Госдуму законопроект об этом. ✅️ Ключевым изменением стало дополнение понятия информационной модели объекта капитального строительства элементом «цифровая информационная модель». Это создаст правовую основу для использования ЦИМ на всех этапах жизненного цикла объекта капитального строительства, отмечается в пояснительной записке. 📃 Т…
🤪2🔥1
Испытательный центр для тестирования строительных технологий открыли во Франции 🏗️ Группа компаний Bouygues Construction под Парижем ввела в эксплуатацию объект площадью 2500 кв.м. 👷🏻♂️ В центре в условиях максимально приближенных к стройплощадке планируют испытывать новые технологии, материалы и методы. Такой подход позволит ускорить их реальное применение. Центр включает отдельные зоны: ➖ для быстрого прототип…
👍3🤝1
Дайджест «Цифрового Строительства» ➖ В Москве разработали ИИ-ассистента для решения градостроительных вопросов ➖ Ученые из МИИГАиК запатентовали метод беспилотной аэрофотосъемки без сигнала ГНСС ➖ Промышленные отходы стали основой арктического цемента ➖ Последствия пожара в особняке Миллера в Санкт-Петербурга оценили при помощи беспилотника ➖ В Германии тестируют робо-платформу для сборки деревянных модулей (на…
👍1
Вуз и строительная компания проведут тонкую настройку строительной 3D-печати 👥 Инженерно-строительный институт СПбПУ и фирма «Геобетон» договорились о совместных научно-исследовательских проектах. Стороны изучат материалы для строительной 3D-печати и технологические режимы их нанесения. 🖨️ Задача у печатной смеси непростая. Она должна проходить через сопло, держать форму после укладки и прочно схватываться с предыд…
🤝3
Showing the 12 most recent of 159 posts we hold for @digitalbuild. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@digitalbuild edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 21 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 29 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@constructionacademic · 5634 postsХованская Галина Петровна
@domduma · 3002 postsСтройка в цифре. Саратов
@minstroy_cifra · 3542 postsTIMNEWSRU (Новости по ТИМ/BIM)
@BIMnewsRU · 2,1821 postАнтон Мороз
@antonmorozru · 45,6031 postШаповалов. BIM в законе
@bim_and_law · 2541 postБУКВАМИ о ЦИФРЕ
@bukvamiocifre · 12,7521 post🚀 Центр цифрового развития строительной отрасли Хабаровского края 🚀
@digibuild_ru · 3221 postЦифровое строительство Дагестана
@digital_stroy · 2861 postЦифровизация строительной отрасли и ЖКХ
@digitalizationRT · 3841 postЭкзон: Автоматизация и управление строительством
@exonproject · 1,2411 postGIS for YOU
@gisforyou · 2451 postRemark - лучшие практики в цифровизации продаж и маркетинга
@remark_digital · 1131 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@effekt_rf · 1,0622 postsTIMNEWSRU (Новости по ТИМ/BIM)
@BIMnewsRU · 2,1821 postБУКВАМИ о ЦИФРЕ
@bukvamiocifre · 12,7521 postАкадемия Поточного Строительства
@constructionacademic · 5631 postЦифровое строительство Дагестана
@digital_stroy · 2861 postЦифровизация строительной отрасли и ЖКХ
@digitalizationRT · 3841 postХованская Галина Петровна
@domduma · 3001 postGIS for YOU
@gisforyou · 2451 postЛикбеZ
@likbezzru · 44,8281 postProptech&Management
@proptech_managment · 4491 postRemark - лучшие практики в цифровизации продаж и маркетинга
@remark_digital · 1131 postТасманский дьявол
@tasmanian_diablo · 14,5671 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@digital_construction_Svrd_region · 1,1131 postМалоэтажная Академия
@maloetaka · 851 postМинстрой России
@minstroyrf · 47,8871 postO2Consulting | Технологии, стратегия, будущее
@O2Consult · 1,8731 postStrategy Partners. Консалтинг и бизнес в России
@StrategyPartners · 4,9801 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bukvamiocifre · 12,752#1
@notimRUtg · 5,214#2
@ggreat_of_development · 100,782#3
@prostobim · 9,050#4
@BIMnewsRU · 2,182#5
@digital_developer · 7,629#6
@tsusacademy · 2,153#7
@minstroyrf · 47,887#8
@mostimforum · 867#9
@constructionbusinessnewsagency · 4,522#10
@bimsert · 5,457#11
@sedo_channel · 6,864#12
@alliance_of_digital_leaders · 18,164#13
@im_journal · 833#14
@rupor_project · 13,645#15
@nostroy_news · 5,112#16
@exonproject · 1,241#17
@developers_policy · 44,709#18
@stroimprosto · 1,216#19
@domrf_expert · 3,501#20
@metabuildum · 397#21
@ncpsplus · 1,037#22
@revit_bim_news · 7,642#23
@russiasmartcity · 19,374#24
@smety · 22,693#25
@BIMLibrary · 2,149#26
@irktim · 407#27
@iBIM_Company · 2,364#28
@pesetcetera · 5,513#29
@faufccru · 2,677#30
@projectoram · 14,118#31
@digitalminstroy · 540#32
@Jelezobetonniyzames · 73,685#33
@letsmanagebim · 1,638#34
@domrf_tech · 5,698#35
@gge_ru · 15,995#36
@best_in_development · 15,489#37
@stroygazeta · 2,343#38
@digital_construction_Svrd_region · 1,113#39
@digital_stroy · 286#40
@sarexmain · 1,987#41
@bimvc · 5,718#42
@signal_docs · 1,455#43
@protimru · 1,149#44
@belaya_kaska · 85,256#45
@niumgsuofficial · 15,171#46
@humor_bim · 7,708#47
@edinyzakazchik · 5,925#48
@smartbuildingrb · 447#49
@mkhusnullin · 224,721#50
@bimleaders2022 · 2,588#51
@mintsifry · 233,805#52
@DataEconomyRU · 7,469#53
@bimlib_pro · 4,483#54
@PTOmanual · 8,622#55
@fbursk · 2,563#56
@otmorozzhennie · 4,315#57
@renga_bim · 3,276#58
@cs_krimea · 343#59
@platform_accent · 218#60
@dvizhenieru · 18,488#61
@legkobim · 2,091#62
@niisforg_kanal · 4,492#63
@filthyarchitect · 20,238#64
@gkadept · 622#65
@sDaver · 8,739#66
@geoinfonews · 3,526#67
@bimvac · 1,477#68
@domrf_life · 33,425#69
@izyskateli · 3,068#70
@kairosengperm · 582#71
@digitalizationRT · 384#72
@digitaltotheworld · 512#73
@osminstroy · 750#74
@spbexp_ru · 975#75
@BIMmeetup · 974#76
@biminpractice · 571#77
@drussia · 13,875#78
@mstroy_tech · 466#79
@erzrf · 14,642#80
@propertyinsider · 116,416#81
@tangllive · 1,190#82
@revitblog · 8,965#83
@BIM_Times · 680#84
@roskapstroy · 2,427#85
@ifc_ru · 1,277#86
@ascon_ru · 3,092#87
@larix_channel · 706#88
@government_rus · 167,672#89
@bim2b · 8,518#90
@domostroy_channel · 42,830#91
@prozru · 44,186#92
@m0n1ch · 34,602#93
@forumdvizhenie · 11,646#94
@bimacad · 2,045#95
@Alferovayulya · 3,858#96
@ria_realty · 64,619#97
@zvonaelena · 3,956#98
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@russiasmartcity · 19,374
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 October 2026
@minstroyrf · 47,887
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 August 2026
@developers_policy · 44,709
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 28 August 2026
@antonmorozru · 45,603
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 30 August 2026
@smety · 22,693
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 September 2026
@prozru · 44,186
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
@ggreat_of_development · 100,782
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026
@domrf_life · 33,425
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
@gradpolitica_mos · 50,142
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Цифровое строительство” (@digitalbuild), 24,087 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digitalbuild.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.