Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Digital Developer → всё о proptech🔥

Channel

Digital Developer → всё о proptech🔥

@digital_developer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,608subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001221318441
TypeChannel
Username@digital_developer
DescriptionСМИ о цифровых технологиях в недвижимости. Мы в MAX https://max.ru/id6685139611_biz Портал digitaldeveloper.ru | Каталог решений → https://proptech.digitaldeveloper.ru/ Связаться → @dd_media_bot
Created30 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/digital_developer

Growth

7,6057,6207,612.56 August 2026 — 7,620 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,618 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,610 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,605 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,609 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,614 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,608 subscribers7,6086 August 202622 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 16 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,603–7,622 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 16:277,608-6
19 Aug 2026, 14:087,614+5
16 Aug 2026, 03:567,609+4
12 Aug 2026, 21:037,605-5
9 Aug 2026, 19:517,610-8
7 Aug 2026, 05:437,618-2
6 Aug 2026, 08:187,620first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.98%
avg views ÷ 7,608 subscribers
Avg views / post
607
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held41 (29 July 202621 August 2026)
Views total24,883
Reactions total309
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 21:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,450
Videos
227
Links
2,450

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 59s
Average length
1m 07s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

295 reactions across 38 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10234.6%
🔥7926.8%
👍5619.0%
227.46%
😁186.10%
😱72.37%
👏62.03%
🤔31.02%
🤯20.678%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 309reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 41 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @digital_developer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
2.44%
1 of 41 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
511
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
546
over 40 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjeMkKwq112 August 202612 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC300 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

♦️ Что рынок понимает под умным домом На рынке до сих пор нет единого понимания того, что считать умным домом. В девелопменте это понятие может относиться как к цифровой инфраструктуре жилого комплекса, так и к решениям внутри квартиры. 👆 Цифровая инфраструктура жилого комплекса К ней относятся системы доступа, видеонаблюдение, учёт ресурсов, диспетчеризация инженерного оборудования, приложение для жителей и серви

1🔥1😁1

21 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC396 views7 reactionsread 22 August 2026

80+ сервисов в одном приложении: как цифровизируют премиальный ЖК ♦️ В московском ЖК «Ривер Парк Кутузовский» готовят приложение, которое объединит более 80 функций для жителей: заявки в УК, бронирование общественных пространств, цифровой доступ, управление лифтами и паркингом. Один из самых необычных сценариев — связка роботизированного паркинга и валет-сервиса. По данным «Аеон Девелопмент», это позволит увеличить

👍32🔥2

21 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC431 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026

#PropTech-мероприятия августа 🤖 21 августа — конец приёма заявок на Arendator Awards, главную премию в сфере коммерческой недвижимости. 🤖 27 августа — Цифровой путь клиента застройщика. На вебинаре коллеги расскажут, как связать продажи, ожидание строительства, передачу квартиры и эксплуатацию так, чтобы клиент оставался в контакте с брендом 🤖 31 августа — конец приёма заявок на премию «Золотой Фотон. Выбор умного

2🔥2

20 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC495 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026

«Оцифровать хаос нельзя» Цифровизация стройки начинается не с выбора нового сервиса. Сначала нужно выстроить процессы — иначе технологии просто перенесут существующий хаос в цифровую среду. ➡️ Об этом поговорили с Михаилом Малыхиным, директором по развитию цифровых технологий Setl Tech (аккредитованной ИТ‑компании, специализирующейся на заказной разработке и цифровизации, входящей в Холдинг Setl Group). В Setl Gro

2👍2🔥2

19 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC476 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Forwarded from @GMKStudyPhoto

Бренд в девелопменте: от стратегии до запуска 7 сентября стартует онлайн-интенсив для тех, кто работает с брендом девелоперского проекта. Четыре дня. Четыре эксперта. Полный путь бренда: от позиционирования и названия до визуальной системы, коммуникационного запуска и жизни после старта. Этот интенсив для вас, если: ✨ проект сложно отличить от конкурентов, а позиционирование строится на общих обещаниях ✨ идея брен

2👍2🔥2

18 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC538 views11 reactionsread 22 August 2026

ИИ помогает выбирать квартиры. Что будет с поиском недвижимости дальше? Покупатели недвижимости всё шире подходят к выбору жилья: сравнивают жилые комплексы с помощью ИИ, рассматривают квартиры в других городах и не ограничиваются только новостройками, изучая предложения на всём рынке. А следующим шагом могут стать ИИ-агенты, которые будут подбирать жильё под конкретную цель — для жизни, аренды или инвестиций. Об э

4👍4🔥3

18 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC459 views9 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

💭 Почему на рынке до сих пор нет единого понимания умного дома? Умные дома всё чаще появляются в проектах застройщиков, но подходы к внедрению решений сильно различаются. Чтобы разобраться в том, как девелоперы развивают это направление, редакция Digital Developer провела исследование с участием компаний из топ-150 ЕРЗ и выделила 10 ключевых трендов рынка умного жилья в 2026 году. О том, как сегодня развивается ры

3👍31🔥1🤔1

17 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC580 views7 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

А сможете объяснить своей бабушке, чем вы занимаетесь на работе? Команда «Контур Недвижимости» справилась с этим🚀 А у вас получится? Пишите в комментариях!

33🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC660 views9 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Кто в России самый цифровой девелопер? «Сколково» составило рейтинг Фонд впервые выпустил публичный индекс инновационности девелоперов, представленный на площадке «Городские лаборатории ВЭБ.РФ». Лидером стала ГК «Галс-Девелопмент», набравшая 13,43 балла из 15 возможных. ➡️ Но интереснее здесь не столько первое место, сколько сама попытка измерить цифровизацию девелоперов не по одному BIM или наличию ИИ. Компании оц

🔥43👍2

14 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC656 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Умный дом перестал быть набором отдельных устройств Digital Developer провёл исследование умных домов в девелопменте. В его основу легли 17 интервью с застройщиками из топ-150 ЕРЗ. Это срез самых активных и технологичных игроков, которые задают будущие стандарты отрасли. Мы проанализировали мнения и практический опыт участников исследования и выделили 10 ключевых трендов рынка умного жилья в 2026 году: 🟤Рынок пе

2👍2🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC572 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Forwarded from @tsusacademyPhoto

⚡️18 августа проведем летний ЦУС Конф «Техподдержка: от простого к сложному» Ситуация из практики: отправили заявку в техподдержку, но ответа нет. Написали еще раз в другой чат — в итоге вопрос решают уже трое из вашей команды и трое со стороны вендора. На вебинаре разберем, почему такие ситуации происходят и как их избежать. Спикеры: Глеб Адамсон, руководитель отдела сервиса «Осмокод», и Василий Сонин, продакт-мен

2

13 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC583 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Ну и зачем нам новостройки? Может, в бабушкину избу? 🛖 Россияне всё чаще присматриваются к старым домам в деревнях. По оценке руководителя центра загородной недвижимости «Этажей» Антона Саукова, за последние 12 месяцев спрос на русские избы вырос на 10–12%. 🟣 Но интерес пока не превращается в такой же рост продаж. Реальных сделок стало на 5–6% меньше: мешают высокие ипотечные ставки, дефицит подходящих домов и завы

2🤔2😱2

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @digital_developer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@digital_developer edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 13,672 of 1,585,237entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Всё о стройке
@ggreat_of_development · 100,621
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026
Железобетонный замес
@Jelezobetonniyzames · 69,018
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026
Треугольный метр
@Bevzenkocom · 57,492
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Digital Developer → всё о proptech🔥” (@digital_developer), 7,608 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digital_developer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.